RED TRUST ENJOYER

RED TRUST ENJOYER — CS2 Stats

CH76561198123683674[U:1:163417946]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,072Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,925Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,315Blue band · top ~32% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,338 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,315 -5,701 28 Aug – 1 Oct · 31 days played
13,93220,789peak 20,78928 Aug1 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,338 +0 29 Aug – 3 Sept · 4 observations
1,3381,338peak 1,33829 Aug3 Sept
21,169Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,338Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,338
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 13 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 6,474 below peak (20,789)
  • -5,573 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 685 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches169——
Win rate48%——
K/D0.90——
Headshot %45%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,886), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.3%45.7%46.8%4.5% short
Shot accuracy6.0%12.7%13.0%7.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.831.051.060.23 short
Match win rate48.9%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRED TRUST ENJOYERFACEITLevel 7 · 1,338 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER14,315 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,338csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning65
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateLLLWLWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +73ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 677ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.2
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.5
Utility4.2
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact9.8

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 29 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · nuke, 12 Sept →
242msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · nuke, 12 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2815–1354%-0.02
mirageS2316–770%0.04
ancientB189–950%0.01
anubisD103–730%0.00
cacheS86–275%-0.00
infernoC73–443%0.00
nukeB63–350%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

109,970Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
6,548Matches
48.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
42.3%Headshot %
6.0%Shot accuracy
14,692MVPs
2,925Hours (in match)
7,854Bombs planted
1,308Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,436
AWP13,232
MAC-103,062
SSG 082,935
FAMAS2,893
MP92,273

Lifetime map wins

18,264dust2
7,490inferno
5,209cbble
3,361nuke
1,600vertigo
877train
329office
41assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

862Matches
52%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
81.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust220352%0.9215.6
Mirage20050%0.8814.2
Ancient16253%0.9115.6
Anubis9154%1.0215.9
Inferno7551%0.8815.1
Nuke4459%0.9216.1
Cache3253%0.8514.9
Overpass2148%1.0316.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
68.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
585msReaction time
50.6%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
9.25HE damage / grenade
4.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4663 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–130.0323%1 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0715%30 Sept →
inferno13–160.0018%30 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0316%29 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.019%29 Sept →
mirage13–00.2533%29 Sept →
mirage13–100.0015%28 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0212%27 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0415%27 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0112%27 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0219%27 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0115%26 Sept →
ancient8–10-0.0021%25 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0023%24 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.048%23 Sept →
cache13–60.0118%23 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.037%23 Sept →
dust213–11-0.018%22 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0611%22 Sept →
mirage13–20.0720%22 Sept →
mirage13–40.0314%22 Sept →
dust26–2-0.0120%22 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0518%21 Sept →
inferno13–60.0818%21 Sept →
anubis13–70.0814%20 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0211%20 Sept →
dust213–40.1015%20 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0320%20 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0024%20 Sept →
mirage12–20.1038%20 Sept →
ancient13–80.0417%20 Sept →
ancient10–130.0518%19 Sept →
nuke16–120.0814%19 Sept →
mirage13–110.0411%19 Sept →
mirage11–130.0514%18 Sept →
mirage13–40.0714%17 Sept →
anubis15–150.0514%17 Sept →
cache13–110.0013%17 Sept →
inferno12–160.0519%17 Sept →
dust214–160.0918%17 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0130%16 Sept →
mirage13–110.0610%15 Sept →
ancient13–80.0819%15 Sept →
mirage13–90.0219%15 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0216%15 Sept →
mirage5–00.1620%15 Sept →
mirage13–0-0.0333%15 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0316%13 Sept →
dust29–13-0.088%13 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0414%13 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0524%12 Sept →
nuke1–9-0.16100%12 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0339%11 Sept →
dust22–13-0.1131%11 Sept →
anubis13–20.087%11 Sept →
mirage11–00.1114%10 Sept →
ancient13–110.0111%10 Sept →
ancient13–40.1020%10 Sept →
dust25–130.0218%8 Sept →
dust20–13-0.1050%7 Sept →
mirage11–130.0627%7 Sept →
anubis1–4-0.0250%7 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0627%7 Sept →
dust213–50.0312%6 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0031%6 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0828%6 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0512%6 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0721%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0318%6 Sept →
nuke13–30.0221%6 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0224%4 Sept →
ancient8–130.0222%4 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.057%4 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0413%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0221%4 Sept →
ancient13–40.0518%3 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0326%3 Sept →
mirage16–140.0216%2 Sept →
mirage13–80.0218%2 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0219%2 Sept →
ancient10–130.0320%2 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0113%2 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0914%1 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0111%31 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.009%31 Aug →
cache13–90.0012%31 Aug →
cache13–11-0.047%31 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0316%31 Aug →
mirage13–30.0010%31 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0115%30 Aug →
mirage3–130.0016%30 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0313%30 Aug →
cache13–30.036%30 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0016%30 Aug →
dust21–13-0.080%29 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0315%29 Aug →
dust213–80.0315%29 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0323%29 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0210%29 Aug →
cache14–16-0.0015%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.