Osuma Ben LAden

Osuma Ben LAden — CS2 Stats

76561198122229213[U:1:161963485]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

396Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
639Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating12,117Blue band · top ~43.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,164 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,117 -1,447 2 Feb – 10 Oct · 18 days played
11,31217,641peak 17,6412 Feb10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,164 +0 2 Sept – 20 Sept · 2 observations
1,1641,164peak 1,1642 Sept20 Sept
18,192Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,164Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-02-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,164
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 37 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,524 below peak (17,641)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,883 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate38.2%44.8%45.7%7.6% short
Shot accuracy10.2%12.4%12.7%2.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.031.050.17 short
Match win rate44.1%45.2%45.7%1.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOsuma Ben LAdenFACEITLevel 6 · 1,164 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER12,117 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,164csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning55
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateWWLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +64ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.5
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time604ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 9–3 · overpass, 17 Jun →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · ancient, 23 Aug →
438msFastest reaction time · 14–16 · cache, 30 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 4 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2311–1248%-0.02
mirageA2212–1055%-0.01
infernoB168–850%-0.02
anubisA127–558%-0.00
nukeD103–730%-0.02
ancientB84–450%-0.01
cache—41–325%-0.04
debris—20–20%-0.14
overpass—21–150%-0.01
poseidon—10–10%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,040Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
1,506Matches
44.1%Match win rate
38.2%Headshot %
10.2%Shot accuracy
2,805MVPs
639Hours (in match)
880Bombs planted
261Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,044dust2
2,326inferno
1,532nuke
1,143train
76vertigo
26cbble
26lake
17office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

291Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
81.5ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8250%1.1716.1
Dust26360%1.1815.6
Inferno4252%1.1314.1
Ancient3352%1.0915.1
Nuke2544%1.0716.2
Anubis2361%1.1014.9
Overpass838%0.9317.3
Train757%1.1215.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.7%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
600msReaction time
30.1%T opening success
58.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
11.61HE damage / grenade
8.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.1246% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–20.0413%11 Oct →
dust213–6-0.048%10 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0510%10 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0722%30 Sept →
cache9–2-0.085%30 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0119%30 Sept →
mirage13–20.0828%30 Sept →
dust213–110.0116%30 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.017%30 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0822%29 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.078%29 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0519%29 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0424%24 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.097%20 Sept →
cache9–130.0213%13 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0410%13 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0121%13 Sept →
debris3–9-0.1922%13 Sept →
mirage13–110.0314%4 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0213%4 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0416%30 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.029%30 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0738%23 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0310%23 Aug →
nuke5–130.0223%23 Aug →
inferno13–60.0521%21 Aug →
inferno16–140.039%21 Aug →
debris4–9-0.105%18 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0430%18 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0213%16 Aug →
anubis19–16-0.0216%28 Jul →
mirage13–40.0322%28 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0314%24 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0318%24 Jul →
nuke13–110.0410%24 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0118%7 Jul →
anubis16–140.0110%7 Jul →
ancient13–110.0510%17 Jun →
mirage10–130.0517%17 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0315%17 Jun →
overpass9–30.1027%17 Jun →
ancient13–40.0929%13 Jun →
anubis6–130.0416%13 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0127%11 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0313%11 Jun →
anubis13–100.0119%11 Jun →
dust213–80.0411%5 Jun →
nuke9–130.0220%5 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0733%5 Jun →
dust22–13-0.0221%30 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0012%17 Apr →
overpass1–13-0.129%8 Apr →
dust213–160.0125%8 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0731%26 Mar →
mirage13–5-0.0115%26 Mar →
anubis10–130.0123%24 Mar →
inferno16–120.0410%23 Mar →
anubis13–60.0611%15 Mar →
nuke5–13-0.068%15 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0513%12 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0611%12 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0321%12 Mar →
poseidon2–9-0.1225%10 Mar →
dust213–80.0116%8 Mar →
mirage7–130.0515%6 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.095%6 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0915%6 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0113%27 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0511%27 Feb →
mirage4–130.0110%27 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0520%15 Feb →
nuke13–50.028%13 Feb →
dust213–10-0.073%13 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0418%13 Feb →
dust29–13-0.069%13 Feb →
dust28–130.0113%13 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0516%13 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0712%6 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0311%6 Feb →
mirage16–13-0.0212%6 Feb →
inferno13–70.0716%6 Feb →
anubis9–130.0112%6 Feb →
dust216–140.0215%6 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0714%6 Feb →
inferno13–4-0.0012%6 Feb →
dust213–8-0.056%6 Feb →
mirage13–5-0.0413%6 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.0614%4 Feb →
mirage13–100.0011%4 Feb →
nuke13–5-0.0718%4 Feb →
dust213–1-0.016%4 Feb →
ancient13–00.0331%4 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0913%4 Feb →
mirage13–3-0.0214%4 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0114%4 Feb →
inferno6–12-0.036%4 Feb →
dust213–5-0.0018%3 Feb →
mirage16–140.0111%3 Feb →
anubis13–110.0417%3 Feb →
dust211–13-0.046%2 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.