Osuma Ben LAden

Osuma Ben LAden — CS2 Stats

76561198122229213[U:1:161963485]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

376Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
631Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,164 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,164 → 1,164
+10Tracked matches · now 376
+10.3ppWin rate · 41.4% → 51.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 30 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,312 -2,359 31 Jan17 Jun · 17 days played
11,31217,641peak 17,64131 Jan17 Jun
18,192Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,164Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-01-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,164
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 37 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate38.1%44.8%45.7%7.6% short
Shot accuracy10.4%12.4%12.7%2.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.041.050.17 short
Match win rate43.9%45.2%45.7%1.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOsuma Ben LAdenFACEITLevel 6 · 1,164 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,164csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning59
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44551Last 10044%Win rateLWWLWLLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −104ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility6.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.9
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time598ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 9–3 · overpass, 17 Jun
38%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · ancient, 23 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 14–16 · cache, 30 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 4 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 21nukeWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C24101442%-0.03
mirageA2112957%-0.00
infernoC1771041%-0.01
anubisB137654%0.00
nukeC114736%-0.02
ancientB63350%-0.01
cache3030%-0.02
debris2020%-0.14
overpass21150%-0.01
poseidon1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,705Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
1,479Matches
43.9%Match win rate
38.1%Headshot %
10.4%Shot accuracy
2,767MVPs
631Hours (in match)
866Bombs planted
258Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,992dust2
2,299inferno
1,512nuke
1,143train
76vertigo
26cbble
26lake
17office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

283Matches
52%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
82.1ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8051%1.1816.3
Dust26060%1.2115.9
Inferno4154%1.1314.0
Ancient3253%1.0915.1
Nuke2544%1.0716.2
Anubis2264%1.1114.8
Overpass838%0.9317.3
Train757%1.1215.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.2%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
591msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
56.1%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
12.64HE damage / grenade
7.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6456% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–130.0213%13 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0410%13 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0121%13 Sept
debris3–9-0.1922%13 Sept
mirage13–110.0314%4 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0213%4 Sept
cache14–16-0.0416%30 Aug
inferno12–12-0.029%30 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0738%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0310%23 Aug
nuke5–130.0223%23 Aug
inferno13–60.0521%21 Aug
inferno16–140.039%21 Aug
debris4–9-0.105%18 Aug
cache7–13-0.0430%18 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0213%16 Aug
anubis19–16-0.0216%28 Jul
mirage13–40.0322%28 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0314%24 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0318%24 Jul
nuke13–110.0410%24 Jul
dust213–9-0.0118%7 Jul
anubis16–140.0110%7 Jul
ancient13–110.0510%17 Jun
mirage10–130.0517%17 Jun
dust29–13-0.0315%17 Jun
overpass9–30.1027%17 Jun
ancient13–40.0929%13 Jun
anubis6–130.0416%13 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0127%11 Jun
dust26–13-0.0313%11 Jun
anubis13–100.0119%11 Jun
dust213–80.0411%5 Jun
nuke9–130.0220%5 Jun
dust213–16-0.0733%5 Jun
dust22–13-0.0221%30 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0012%17 Apr
overpass1–13-0.129%8 Apr
dust213–160.0125%8 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0731%26 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0115%26 Mar
anubis10–130.0123%24 Mar
inferno16–120.0410%23 Mar
anubis13–60.0611%15 Mar
nuke5–13-0.068%15 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0513%12 Mar
dust211–13-0.0611%12 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0321%12 Mar
poseidon2–9-0.1225%10 Mar
dust213–80.0116%8 Mar
mirage7–130.0515%6 Mar
ancient6–13-0.095%6 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0915%6 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0113%27 Feb
dust210–13-0.0511%27 Feb
mirage4–130.0110%27 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0520%15 Feb
nuke13–50.028%13 Feb
dust213–10-0.073%13 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0418%13 Feb
dust29–13-0.069%13 Feb
dust28–130.0113%13 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0516%13 Feb
dust27–13-0.0712%6 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0311%6 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0212%6 Feb
inferno13–70.0716%6 Feb
anubis9–130.0112%6 Feb
dust216–140.0215%6 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0714%6 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0012%6 Feb
dust213–8-0.056%6 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0413%6 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0614%4 Feb
mirage13–100.0011%4 Feb
nuke13–5-0.0718%4 Feb
dust213–1-0.016%4 Feb
ancient13–00.0331%4 Feb
dust211–13-0.0913%4 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0214%4 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0114%4 Feb
inferno6–12-0.036%4 Feb
dust213–5-0.0018%3 Feb
mirage16–140.0111%3 Feb
anubis13–110.0417%3 Feb
dust211–13-0.046%2 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0215%2 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0324%31 Jan
anubis13–30.0323%31 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0417%31 Jan
dust213–20.0213%31 Jan
mirage13–50.0028%31 Jan
dust29–13-0.058%31 Jan
mirage11–130.0722%30 Jan
dust213–100.0320%30 Jan
nuke13–11-0.003%30 Jan
mirage13–60.0123%30 Jan
dust29–13-0.1117%30 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0120%30 Jan
inferno11–130.0214%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →