Trash

Trash — CS2 Stats

SE76561198121923828[U:1:161658100]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,456Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,810Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,786Top 50% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69773 of 251343 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,213 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1202Premier CS Rating · 19,584 → 20,786

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,786 -938 6 Aug – 12 Oct · 24 days played
17,98821,724peak 21,7246 Aug12 Oct
22,482Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,213Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,213
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 138 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 938 below peak (21,724)
  • +1,600 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,214 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches51——
Win rate61%——
K/D0.83——
Headshot %41%——

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 12 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.5%43.7%44.8%3.3% short
Shot accuracy13.1%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.831.021.030.20 short
Match win rate44.3%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTrashFACEITLevel 5 · 1,213 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,786 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,213csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning36
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateWWWTWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 8–1–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 14–5–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.4
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 41% on T to 22% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning3.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time564ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 11.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 12 Oct →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · cache, 8 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · mirage, 16 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 74% over 23infernoWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2317–674%0.00
dust2C156–940%-0.02
infernoD144–1029%-0.03
ancientC135–838%-0.03
cacheC135–838%-0.02
anubisC104–640%-0.02
nukeS107–370%-0.00
overpass—10–10%0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,733Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
5,085Matches
44.3%Match win rate
41.5%Headshot %
13.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9,831MVPs
2,125Hours (in match)
7,370Bombs planted
1,224Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,082
SSG 082,627
MAC-102,097
MP92,022
UMP-451,764
AWP1,762

Lifetime map wins

9,060inferno
4,771dust2
2,896nuke
1,261vertigo
926cbble
769train
203lake
129office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

229Matches
54%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
73.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2868%0.9413.1
Cache1275%0.8414.5
Inferno1145%0.8513.6
Dust21040%0.8412.4
Nuke825%0.8713.5
Ancient757%0.9616.1
Anubis450%1.1416.5
Vertigo367%0.8914.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
564msReaction time
40.5%T opening success
22.4%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
7.86HE damage / grenade
6.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.1713% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 22.3738% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0514%12 Oct →
ancient13–50.118%12 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0214%12 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0511%12 Oct →
nuke13–60.0117%12 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0111%12 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0418%11 Oct →
mirage13–110.0115%10 Oct →
mirage2–130.0016%10 Oct →
anubis13–110.0014%10 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0219%10 Oct →
dust213–6-0.016%10 Oct →
anubis13–10.0610%10 Oct →
nuke7–130.0517%8 Oct →
dust213–80.0718%8 Oct →
mirage13–100.0217%7 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.068%7 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.058%7 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0121%4 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0615%4 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0419%4 Oct →
dust29–130.0020%4 Oct →
cache5–13-0.068%27 Sept →
anubis13–20.024%27 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.029%27 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0015%27 Sept →
mirage13–70.044%16 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.036%16 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.1113%16 Sept →
cache13–80.0214%16 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0512%15 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0716%15 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0721%15 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0822%15 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.069%14 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0310%14 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.0223%14 Sept →
inferno13–30.0112%13 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0416%13 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0721%12 Sept →
nuke13–110.0812%12 Sept →
mirage13–100.0513%12 Sept →
mirage13–20.119%12 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0116%12 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0517%11 Sept →
dust28–130.0124%11 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0823%11 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.049%11 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0212%10 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.070%10 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0617%10 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0016%10 Sept →
dust27–13-0.029%10 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0417%10 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0328%10 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0110%10 Sept →
dust26–130.0126%10 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0335%10 Sept →
mirage13–70.017%10 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0913%10 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0321%9 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0412%9 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0917%8 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0313%8 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0038%8 Sept →
inferno9–130.016%8 Sept →
nuke16–140.0123%8 Sept →
dust211–13-0.048%8 Sept →
mirage13–80.0113%8 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.001%8 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.037%8 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.067%7 Sept →
mirage13–50.1119%7 Sept →
overpass6–130.0210%7 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.100%7 Sept →
inferno13–110.029%6 Sept →
mirage13–80.0413%6 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0015%6 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0421%5 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0611%5 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.028%3 Sept →
nuke13–20.0312%3 Sept →
dust219–22-0.0110%18 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0412%17 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.060%16 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0614%14 Aug →
vertigo14–16-0.0415%10 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0114%9 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0412%9 Aug →
mirage13–80.0113%9 Aug →
inferno13–90.0022%9 Aug →
nuke9–130.0121%7 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.089%7 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0810%7 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.054%6 Aug →
cache13–70.0117%6 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0313%6 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0414%6 Aug →
mirage13–10.0214%6 Aug →
cache13–60.0717%6 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.