ุㅤㅤㅤNameless

ุㅤㅤㅤNameless — CS2 Stats

76561198121921703[U:1:161655975]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,147Tracked matches46%Win rate2025Tracked since
4,176Hours in CS91Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,891Blue band · top ~39.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,147 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 15 days played since 30 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,891 -787 30 Aug16 Sept · 16 days played
12,76814,837peak 14,83730 Aug16 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
937Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
15Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,946 below peak (14,837)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,109 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches3346−13
Win rate39%41%−2pp
K/D1.121.73−0.61
Headshot %73%80%−7pp

Measured 11 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate68.4%45.8%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.5%12.7%13.0%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.051.060.13 short
Match win rate42.9%45.7%46.3%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGุㅤㅤㅤNamelessFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER12,891 · Blue bandPEAK ELO937csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning63
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42526Last 10042%Win rateWLLWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +8.7pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 38%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility3.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.3
Utility3.9
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels8.3
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time575ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy33.4%+5.5%
first ⅓ avg 27.9% → last ⅓ avg 33.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 31 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · nuke, 10 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 5–0 · nuke, 10 Sept
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
514In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 55% over 11anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2281436%0.02
nukeB1910953%0.02
mirageB147750%0.01
infernoC145936%0.02
anubisD134931%-0.01
cacheA116555%0.01
ancient42250%0.04
train2020%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,529Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
3,239Matches
42.9%Match win rate
68.4%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 7 players
0.5%Shot accuracy
7,300MVPs
1,766Hours (in match)
2,234Bombs planted
535Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,366dust2
4,108nuke
3,602inferno
1,169vertigo
569train
57office
37italy
10safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

325Matches
49%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
81.7ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6943%0.9215.3
Dust25850%1.0116.0
Inferno5753%1.0216.1
Ancient4358%0.9916.4
Anubis4030%0.9015.5
Nuke3754%1.1716.0
Cache1362%0.9917.5
Overpass757%1.0114.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

33.2%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
86.7%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
584msReaction time
69.5%T opening success
57.3%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
9.73HE damage / grenade
7.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4125 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–9-0.0119%15 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0225%15 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0342%14 Sept
nuke13–110.0420%14 Sept
mirage10–1-0.0475%14 Sept
dust23–13-0.0262%14 Sept
dust21–13-0.0719%13 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0129%13 Sept
dust24–13-0.0246%13 Sept
mirage13–90.0247%13 Sept
dust29–130.0144%13 Sept
cache11–130.0030%13 Sept
inferno13–90.0534%13 Sept
nuke16–130.0729%13 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0233%13 Sept
dust215–150.0726%13 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0529%13 Sept
mirage13–70.0231%13 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0511%13 Sept
mirage3–130.0030%12 Sept
nuke12–120.0344%12 Sept
inferno8–130.1153%12 Sept
dust213–1-0.0143%12 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0526%12 Sept
nuke11–130.1024%12 Sept
inferno8–130.0532%12 Sept
nuke13–110.0831%12 Sept
inferno10–130.0138%12 Sept
mirage13–30.0623%12 Sept
cache13–11-0.0430%10 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0423%10 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0324%10 Sept
nuke11–130.0529%10 Sept
nuke11–130.0130%10 Sept
cache13–70.0828%10 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0034%10 Sept
train1–13-0.0647%10 Sept
nuke5–0-0.03100%10 Sept
dust210–130.0126%9 Sept
inferno12–160.0233%9 Sept
anubis14–160.0118%9 Sept
mirage8–130.0431%9 Sept
mirage7–130.0122%8 Sept
dust25–13-0.0036%8 Sept
cache13–80.0537%8 Sept
dust213–40.0415%8 Sept
cache13–3-0.0234%8 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0118%8 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0226%8 Sept
inferno13–100.0625%7 Sept
dust211–130.0523%7 Sept
nuke5–8-0.0119%7 Sept
cache11–13-0.0239%7 Sept
nuke12–16-0.0629%6 Sept
dust213–16-0.0827%6 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0046%6 Sept
nuke13–50.0134%6 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0429%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.0328%6 Sept
anubis12–120.0036%5 Sept
train5–130.0237%5 Sept
mirage10–130.0233%5 Sept
cache13–60.0830%5 Sept
nuke13–100.1033%5 Sept
cache13–80.0428%5 Sept
dust213–40.0229%5 Sept
dust210–130.0325%4 Sept
nuke13–70.0724%4 Sept
dust215–150.0430%4 Sept
cache5–13-0.0214%3 Sept
vertigo12–12-0.0045%3 Sept
mirage13–70.0628%2 Sept
anubis13–90.0527%2 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0143%2 Sept
dust211–13-0.0232%2 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0324%1 Sept
nuke13–0-0.0139%1 Sept
dust213–80.0225%1 Sept
ancient13–80.0824%1 Sept
inferno11–130.0128%1 Sept
dust214–160.0223%31 Aug
dust213–60.1234%31 Aug
inferno13–10.0532%31 Aug
cache10–130.0131%31 Aug
anubis13–40.0828%31 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0620%31 Aug
dust213–50.1624%31 Aug
inferno14–160.1123%31 Aug
nuke12–120.0139%31 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0334%31 Aug
dust213–110.1032%31 Aug
ancient5–130.1223%31 Aug
dust211–130.0120%31 Aug
mirage13–90.0015%31 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0538%31 Aug
nuke13–10.0122%31 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0330%31 Aug
ancient6–130.0322%31 Aug
cache7–13-0.0227%31 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0019%31 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →