HerZ♔⭕⃤

HerZ♔⭕⃤ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198121544710[U:1:161278982]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,505Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,667Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,505 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 2 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 -1,746 2 Jan1 Jul · 8 days played
19,67722,563peak 22,5632 Jan1 Jul
22,563Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-01-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate50.2%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy17.4%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.381.061.07above
Match win rate50.9%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHerZ♔⭕⃤FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning44
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47494Last 10047%Win rateLLWWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility5.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time608ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+7.6%
first ⅓ avg 11.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 9–7 · nuke, 28 Mar
43%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 11 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · nuke, 24 Feb
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 29 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
94In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2316770%0.00
ancientD1861233%-0.04
dust2C1761135%-0.02
nukeC114736%-0.01
cacheS86275%-0.04
mirageC73443%-0.01
overpassA53260%-0.01
anubis2020%-0.03
office2020%-0.04
poseidon21150%0.00
train1010%-0.00
stronghold110100%0.01
italy1010%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.03
warden110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

182,647Lifetime kills
1.38K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
7,771Matches
50.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
50.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
16,842MVPs
3,234Hours (in match)
2,562Bombs planted
2,742Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,193
Negev28,666
AWP10,411
P2506,136
P904,123
Knife3,365

Lifetime map wins

11,306inferno
7,824dust2
2,978nuke
2,739vertigo
2,004train
1,440cbble
964office
427italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

692Matches
52%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
74.8ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
5%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3571%0.9815.4
Inferno2552%0.9614.2
Mirage1839%0.8112.8
Overpass1050%1.0815.7
Anubis944%0.9012.7
Dust2944%1.1616.1
Vertigo20%0.6612.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
598msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
10.55HE damage / grenade
6.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.1135% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–13-0.0416%4 Sept
dust29–13-0.0522%29 Aug
inferno13–0-0.0925%29 Aug
inferno13–70.0416%29 Aug
inferno7–3-0.0312%29 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0618%29 Aug
cache13–70.0418%29 Aug
ancient13–5-0.077%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0522%2 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0219%11 Jul
dust22–13-0.0443%11 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0215%11 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0426%10 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0415%10 Jul
cache13–3-0.0712%10 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0024%4 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0213%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0214%1 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0419%29 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0116%28 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0223%28 Jun
inferno13–80.0613%28 Jun
dust215–15-0.0522%27 Jun
cache11–13-0.0227%27 Jun
ancient9–13-0.068%26 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0124%26 Jun
dust213–70.0235%26 Jun
nuke13–80.0522%26 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0115%4 Jun
cache13–8-0.0420%4 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0814%3 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0113%3 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0326%2 Jun
train8–13-0.0012%2 Jun
cache13–11-0.0813%21 May
cache13–4-0.0411%15 May
cache13–4-0.0613%15 May
dust210–13-0.0314%6 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0212%3 Apr
nuke7–130.0015%28 Mar
inferno12–12-0.015%28 Mar
dust29–13-0.0623%28 Mar
nuke9–70.1114%28 Mar
inferno13–6-0.028%27 Mar
stronghold13–90.0115%27 Mar
dust213–90.0223%27 Mar
mirage7–40.0220%27 Mar
italy4–130.019%27 Mar
vertigo6–13-0.036%27 Mar
office6–13-0.0018%27 Mar
warden13–11-0.055%27 Mar
poseidon6–9-0.0618%27 Mar
inferno9–20.0515%27 Mar
overpass6–13-0.059%12 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0319%12 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0517%28 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0114%28 Feb
inferno16–140.0227%25 Feb
ancient10–130.0012%25 Feb
overpass13–7-0.025%25 Feb
dust213–6-0.0117%25 Feb
ancient6–13-0.073%25 Feb
dust28–13-0.039%25 Feb
inferno12–16-0.027%25 Feb
inferno13–110.006%24 Feb
inferno13–40.1022%24 Feb
dust213–70.0623%24 Feb
ancient5–13-0.097%24 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0810%24 Feb
nuke3–9-0.155%24 Feb
poseidon9–60.0615%24 Feb
office9–13-0.089%23 Feb
mirage6–130.0214%23 Feb
nuke10–13-0.027%23 Feb
anubis3–13-0.056%23 Feb
inferno8–130.0017%23 Feb
ancient8–13-0.078%23 Feb
dust212–12-0.0113%21 Feb
nuke9–130.0313%21 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0111%9 Feb
ancient13–5-0.0111%9 Feb
inferno13–3-0.0331%1 Feb
dust213–100.029%30 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0310%30 Jan
dust213–16-0.0415%23 Jan
ancient13–9-0.046%23 Jan
overpass13–20.0612%23 Jan
inferno9–60.0310%18 Jan
dust215–15-0.0313%17 Jan
inferno13–70.0518%17 Jan
ancient13–5-0.0112%17 Jan
mirage13–160.0110%17 Jan
mirage13–11-0.059%7 Jan
inferno13–50.0417%7 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0113%6 Jan
dust213–5-0.0010%4 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0126%2 Jan
overpass6–13-0.045%2 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0611%2 Jan
nuke9–13-0.052%2 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →