I ZIPTIED MY PENIS TO A BROCK

I ZIPTIED MY PENIS TO A BROCK — CS2 Stats

US76561198120955402[U:1:160689674]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

767Tracked matches40%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,942Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 3 · 712 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,018), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate40.0%41.9%42.7%2.7% short
Shot accuracy11.0%12.2%11.2%0.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.830.981.000.16 short
Match win rate44.1%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGI ZIPTIED MY PENIS TO A B…FACEITLevel 3 · 712 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning44
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5644Last 10056%Win rateLWLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility4.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time540ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–11 · anubis, 8 Aug
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · ancient, 29 Aug
414msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 16 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 24 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
1511In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA50292158%-0.02
ancientA2113862%-0.01
anubisC146843%-0.03
nukeB63350%-0.02
cacheS65183%0.01
dust22020%0.00
vertigo1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,019Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
2,024Matches
44.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
40.0%Headshot %
11.0%Shot accuracy
3,480MVPs
840Hours (in match)
2,965Bombs planted
386Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,875dust2
2,386inferno
854nuke
418train
291cbble
46vertigo
43lake
39office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

539Matches
48%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
64.1ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24149%0.7811.9
Ancient10255%0.8412.5
Anubis5643%0.7913.0
Nuke4243%0.8413.0
Inferno2454%0.6911.9
Dust22438%0.8013.0
Cache2157%0.9512.2
Train333%0.6712.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
28.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.8%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
537msReaction time
22.3%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
5.61HE damage / grenade
7.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.296% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.035%16 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0720%16 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0112%8 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0015%8 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0611%29 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0316%29 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0322%29 Aug
ancient13–70.0233%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0314%29 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0617%27 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0514%27 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0113%27 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0115%26 Aug
anubis16–19-0.048%26 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0116%18 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0618%18 Aug
ancient6–130.0220%18 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0422%17 Aug
anubis10–13-0.089%15 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0715%15 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0215%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0914%15 Aug
anubis13–20.0612%15 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0021%15 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0414%15 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0220%13 Aug
mirage2–13-0.098%13 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0031%12 Aug
mirage3–13-0.087%12 Aug
mirage17–19-0.0820%10 Aug
ancient10–130.0515%10 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0014%9 Aug
anubis17–19-0.0710%9 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0018%9 Aug
anubis13–110.1120%8 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0215%7 Aug
nuke13–100.0013%7 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0017%7 Aug
ancient13–50.0312%6 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0511%6 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0527%5 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0616%5 Aug
mirage13–90.0515%3 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0411%3 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0719%25 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0429%25 Jul
cache13–10-0.058%24 Jul
mirage13–40.0920%24 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0120%24 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0712%24 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0515%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0113%17 Jul
mirage13–40.0013%16 Jul
anubis22–20-0.059%12 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0014%12 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0526%12 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0110%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.059%10 Jul
mirage13–80.0323%10 Jul
mirage6–130.0126%2 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0210%2 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0513%29 Jun
cache13–70.0626%28 Jun
anubis16–140.0219%28 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0510%27 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0412%26 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0326%24 Jun
ancient13–60.0617%24 Jun
dust212–160.0116%24 Jun
ancient13–0-0.000%24 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0113%24 Jun
ancient13–5-0.016%22 Jun
cache13–80.0321%22 Jun
ancient10–13-0.033%14 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0121%14 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0215%14 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0314%13 Jun
mirage9–130.0120%12 Jun
mirage13–10.0113%12 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0611%8 Jun
mirage13–4-0.089%6 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0622%6 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0310%6 Jun
mirage10–130.0017%6 Jun
dust28–13-0.0129%6 Jun
anubis16–14-0.058%1 Jun
ancient13–110.0113%30 May
anubis13–6-0.0113%30 May
ancient10–13-0.006%30 May
anubis11–13-0.0617%30 May
mirage13–110.0923%29 May
mirage13–110.0316%29 May
cache7–130.0525%26 May
cache13–100.0311%26 May
mirage13–100.0314%25 May
cache13–9-0.0511%25 May
mirage13–4-0.0825%25 May
mirage10–130.0016%25 May
ancient14–16-0.026%21 May
mirage7–130.0417%21 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →