lo8e — CS2 Stats

GB76561198120399158[U:1:160133430]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

460Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,029Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating21,155Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#65721 of 252608 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,155 → 21,155

+2Tracked matches · now 460

0.0ppWin rate · 70.0% → 70.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,155 +3,434 17 Nov – 7 Sept · 6 days played

21,155Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,447Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

36Days played since 2025-10-20

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 21,155
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,845 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	52.3%	45.7%	46.8%	above
Shot accuracy	16.1%	12.7%	13.0%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.87	1.05	1.06	above
Match win rate	54.8%	45.7%	46.3%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 8 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning63

Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–35–6Last 10059%Win rateWWLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −6.0pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

8–2 · 80% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

14–6 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.4

Utility2.2

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch4.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning6.3

Utility2.2

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time572ms+19ms

first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms

Headshot accuracy22.5%−0.6%

first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 17 Nov →

48%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · office, 29 Oct →

352msFastest reaction time · 5–0 · office, 8 Nov →

13–0Biggest win · nuke, 1 Dec →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak

W2Current streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 60% over 58ancientWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
office	A	58	35–23	60%	0.03
nuke	A	16	9–7	56%	0.03
vertigo	C	9	4–5	44%	0.06
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	0.04
dust2	—	4	2–2	50%	0.10
inferno	—	3	3–0	100%	0.05
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.02
warden	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	0.12
mirage	—	1	1–0	100%	0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,722Lifetime kills

1.87K/D · Top 5% of Level 7 players

2,769Matches

54.8%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 7 players

52.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players

16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players

7,952MVPs

1,029Hours (in match)

2,243Bombs planted

866Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,622

M4A4 / M4A1-S9,591

P905,927

AWP4,325

Desert Eagle3,771

P2000 / USP-S2,904

FAMAS2,801

Glock-182,417

UMP-452,027

P2501,922

Lifetime map wins

3,827nuke

2,990dust2

2,695inferno

2,048vertigo

1,815lake

1,475safehouse

1,364office

1,159bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

106Matches

50%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

89.6ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	9	44%	1.35	15.0
Nuke	9	56%	1.51	19.0
Overpass	5	60%	1.18	18.2
Mirage	5	20%	0.96	16.8
Inferno	2	100%	1.52	16.5
Train	2	0%	1.56	15.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy

33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.9%Spray accuracy

82.1%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

574msReaction time

43.0%T opening success

42.9%CT opening success

0.26Enemies flashed / flash

7.6%Flash assists

8.55HE damage / grenade

0.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2585 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
office	13–7	-0.00	30%	28 Sept →
office	13–5	0.06	11%	26 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	0.00	27%	14 Apr →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	10%	12 Apr →
office	13–7	0.08	27%	11 Apr →
nuke	13–6	-0.06	11%	11 Apr →
vertigo	8–13	0.02	28%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–2	0.20	25%	3 Apr →
vertigo	13–8	0.13	21%	3 Apr →
vertigo	13–11	-0.02	20%	2 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.09	16%	2 Apr →
nuke	9–13	0.02	23%	29 Mar →
warden	6–13	0.00	43%	2 Feb →
office	13–3	0.01	21%	2 Feb →
office	13–7	-0.01	32%	2 Feb →
office	13–9	0.04	18%	1 Dec →
nuke	13–0	0.05	40%	1 Dec →
office	8–13	-0.04	17%	30 Nov →
office	13–2	0.18	37%	30 Nov →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	22%	30 Nov →
inferno	13–3	0.09	17%	30 Nov →
ancient	5–13	0.02	15%	30 Nov →
vertigo	13–11	0.17	20%	30 Nov →
dust2	10–13	0.06	23%	30 Nov →
ancient	11–13	0.06	25%	29 Nov →
office	13–6	0.08	27%	29 Nov →
ancient	13–11	0.08	21%	29 Nov →
dust2	10–4	0.18	28%	29 Nov →
italy	13–8	0.12	26%	29 Nov →
overpass	13–9	-0.02	14%	26 Nov →
mirage	13–7	0.12	18%	26 Nov →
inferno	13–5	0.03	16%	26 Nov →
office	13–8	0.09	16%	25 Nov →
office	13–11	-0.03	25%	23 Nov →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	21%	23 Nov →
overpass	13–8	0.07	18%	23 Nov →
nuke	13–6	0.06	21%	23 Nov →
inferno	9–5	0.02	22%	23 Nov →
office	11–13	0.07	22%	22 Nov →
ancient	13–7	0.06	13%	22 Nov →
office	13–9	-0.06	15%	20 Nov →
office	13–3	-0.01	16%	19 Nov →
office	13–9	-0.03	28%	19 Nov →
office	13–8	-0.00	34%	19 Nov →
office	3–13	-0.04	41%	18 Nov →
office	13–2	0.06	16%	17 Nov →
office	13–5	0.05	24%	17 Nov →
office	13–2	0.10	25%	17 Nov →
office	13–4	0.15	35%	17 Nov →
office	13–3	-0.01	25%	17 Nov →
dust2	13–5	0.21	36%	17 Nov →
nuke	8–13	0.01	18%	17 Nov →
nuke	3–13	0.02	47%	17 Nov →
office	10–13	0.03	28%	17 Nov →
vertigo	11–13	0.07	19%	14 Nov →
office	13–4	0.00	10%	12 Nov →
office	8–13	-0.04	20%	12 Nov →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	22%	8 Nov →
office	8–13	0.03	19%	8 Nov →
office	13–8	-0.05	21%	8 Nov →
office	13–7	-0.03	32%	8 Nov →
office	5–0	0.01	17%	8 Nov →
office	13–8	0.02	22%	8 Nov →
office	13–5	-0.07	22%	7 Nov →
office	13–4	0.20	43%	7 Nov →
office	13–2	-0.07	22%	7 Nov →
office	10–13	0.00	29%	7 Nov →
office	13–4	0.09	21%	7 Nov →
office	13–11	0.01	26%	7 Nov →
office	7–13	-0.03	21%	6 Nov →
nuke	9–13	0.07	20%	6 Nov →
office	13–1	0.04	29%	6 Nov →
office	2–13	0.02	19%	6 Nov →
office	13–8	0.08	36%	6 Nov →
office	13–7	0.06	23%	6 Nov →
office	11–13	0.09	35%	6 Nov →
office	11–13	0.00	34%	4 Nov →
nuke	13–5	0.15	11%	1 Nov →
office	12–12	0.07	18%	1 Nov →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	6%	29 Oct →
office	4–13	-0.04	48%	29 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.07	18%	28 Oct →
office	13–3	0.08	23%	28 Oct →
office	12–12	0.09	35%	28 Oct →
nuke	2–9	-0.05	7%	27 Oct →
office	12–12	0.05	14%	26 Oct →
office	12–12	0.08	13%	26 Oct →
office	7–13	-0.05	20%	26 Oct →
office	12–12	0.01	30%	26 Oct →
office	13–6	0.15	23%	26 Oct →
office	7–13	0.06	22%	26 Oct →
vertigo	12–12	0.05	19%	24 Oct →
nuke	13–8	0.03	26%	24 Oct →
office	6–13	0.02	30%	24 Oct →
office	10–13	0.04	27%	24 Oct →
office	2–0	0.07	40%	24 Oct →
vertigo	10–13	0.02	17%	23 Oct →
vertigo	13–2	0.09	29%	23 Oct →
office	5–13	0.00	25%	22 Oct →
office	7–13	-0.07	0%	20 Oct →