:3lair

:3lair — CS2 Stats

76561198120385414[U:1:160119686]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,693Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,518Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,191 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (58 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,191 → 2,191
+2Tracked matches · now 1,693
−3.7ppWin rate · 44.4% → 40.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,533 -2,607 23 Apr – 3 Jul · 13 days played
21,53324,999peak 24,99923 Apr3 Jul
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,191Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-03-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,191
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 309 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate51.2%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy14.9%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.241.071.09above
Match win rate45.6%46.9%48.4%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG:3lairFACEITLevel 9 · 2,191 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,191csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning51
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateLWLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −9.8pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 20

  • 5–12–3 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time552ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy27.2%+9.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 27.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 1 Jun →
58%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · anubis, 21 Jun →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · anubis, 18 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 1 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 10dust2Weakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2413–1154%0.01
anubisC229–1341%0.01
ancientB136–746%0.00
nukeB126–650%0.02
cacheS107–370%-0.00
dust2D103–730%-0.00
inferno—41–325%-0.02
vertigo—30–30%0.03
overpass—22–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

188,529Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
6,623Matches
45.6%Match win rate
51.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
14,823MVPs
3,518Hours (in match)
5,291Bombs planted
1,873Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4768,880
AWP17,605
SSG 084,102
P2503,153
SG 5532,706
Nova2,414

Lifetime map wins

5,632nuke
5,099inferno
3,756dust2
3,639vertigo
1,540train
846cbble
505office
267italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

485Matches
53%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
78.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5756%1.1015.7
Anubis4048%1.1715.4
Nuke1963%1.2616.3
Ancient1753%1.1116.1
Inferno1540%1.0414.3
Dust21436%0.9614.9
Overpass1136%0.8213.3
Vertigo967%1.1318.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
567msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
42.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
11.73HE damage / grenade
6.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4061% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo5–13-0.008%10 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0426%27 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0516%10 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0716%10 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0430%10 Jul →
inferno10–90.0326%3 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0128%2 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0232%1 Jul →
anubis6–130.0458%21 Jun →
nuke6–130.0135%21 Jun →
cache13–90.0129%20 Jun →
vertigo12–120.0320%20 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0144%20 Jun →
vertigo12–120.0657%20 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0139%19 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0639%18 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0446%18 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0236%18 Jun →
inferno1–13-0.0350%18 Jun →
overpass13–9-0.0011%17 Jun →
mirage13–40.0333%16 Jun →
mirage16–140.0521%15 Jun →
anubis13–100.0125%14 Jun →
inferno2–13-0.007%7 Jun →
mirage9–130.0219%7 Jun →
anubis13–5-0.005%7 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0127%7 Jun →
mirage13–3-0.0617%7 Jun →
ancient10–50.0314%7 Jun →
nuke14–160.0410%6 Jun →
nuke13–20.0821%6 Jun →
anubis13–00.1320%1 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0235%31 May →
inferno2–13-0.0725%30 May →
nuke6–130.0133%29 May →
mirage11–10.0213%25 May →
anubis7–13-0.0822%25 May →
cache13–50.0915%17 May →
cache13–50.039%17 May →
nuke19–170.0217%3 May →
cache13–110.0113%2 May →
nuke16–120.0628%2 May →
nuke5–130.0717%2 May →
mirage13–9-0.0021%2 May →
mirage19–170.0423%1 May →
ancient9–130.0718%1 May →
anubis13–100.0621%1 May →
ancient13–80.0330%30 Apr →
mirage6–130.0124%30 Apr →
cache4–13-0.0630%29 Apr →
cache13–40.0321%29 Apr →
ancient13–70.029%29 Apr →
mirage22–180.0018%29 Apr →
anubis12–160.0412%28 Apr →
mirage13–20.0716%28 Apr →
anubis8–130.0116%28 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0019%28 Apr →
nuke10–130.0327%28 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0318%27 Apr →
dust213–90.0222%27 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0211%27 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0342%27 Apr →
anubis13–110.0513%25 Apr →
nuke13–2-0.049%25 Apr →
anubis12–16-0.078%25 Apr →
anubis13–00.0119%25 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0017%25 Apr →
overpass13–3-0.0213%25 Apr →
mirage13–60.0110%24 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0323%24 Apr →
anubis13–70.0614%24 Apr →
ancient13–100.0217%23 Apr →
dust213–80.0512%23 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.0429%20 Apr →
mirage8–130.0214%17 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0117%17 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0114%9 Apr →
nuke13–50.0310%22 Mar →
anubis11–130.1025%22 Mar →
mirage7–130.0612%22 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.0617%21 Mar →
anubis13–2-0.0513%21 Mar →
dust213–100.0216%21 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0620%21 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0410%21 Mar →
mirage13–60.0926%20 Mar →
ancient11–130.0615%20 Mar →
mirage13–60.0715%19 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0117%8 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0116%7 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0220%7 Mar →
anubis9–130.0422%7 Mar →
dust217–190.0024%7 Mar →
mirage14–160.0416%6 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0334%6 Mar →
anubis13–60.0818%6 Mar →
mirage13–100.0518%6 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0222%5 Mar →
dust213–16-0.0220%5 Mar →
mirage13–70.0520%5 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.