rannz

rannz — CS2 Stats

HN76561198119849252[U:1:159583524]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

915Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,589Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,738Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#78119 of 221382 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 915 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 23 Feb 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,738 -656 22 Mar1 Sept · 9 days played
18,65520,394peak 20,39422 Mar1 Sept
20,517Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2025-02-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 656 below peak (20,394)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 262 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 8 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 8 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate41.0%46.8%48.3%7.3% short
Shot accuracy17.9%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.051.061.070.02 short
Match win rate42.1%46.3%46.9%4.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrannzFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,738 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning47
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT35333Last 7149%Win rateWWLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +103ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Newest first, from the last 71 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility6.4
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.7
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time642ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 71 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 16–12 · inferno, 12 May
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · anubis, 15 Apr
469msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · nuke, 31 Mar
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 15 Aug

Across the last 71 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2081240%-0.00
mirageA1911858%0.02
infernoC146843%-0.00
overpassB63350%-0.03
ancientA53260%0.01
nuke31233%-0.02
anubis220100%0.02
train21150%0.00

Across the last 71 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

128,321Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
5,360Matches
42.1%Match win rate
41.0%Headshot %
17.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
14,740MVPs
2,589Hours (in match)
3,679Bombs planted
1,429Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,620
AWP27,495
P2503,208
UMP-452,990
FAMAS2,376
Tec-92,224

Lifetime map wins

24,863dust2
7,653inferno
1,477nuke
1,117train
519vertigo
333cbble
100italy
100office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

577Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
78.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8558%1.0616.2
Dust25753%1.1216.7
Inferno5347%0.9614.4
Anubis4439%0.9214.9
Nuke3238%0.8315.6
Ancient2450%0.9214.5
Overpass2055%0.8916.8
Vertigo1457%1.0216.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
653msReaction time
30.1%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
7.65HE damage / grenade
15.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.0747% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0516%14 May
inferno16–120.1123%12 May
dust29–13-0.0222%12 May
anubis16–14-0.0222%10 May
mirage13–9-0.0124%5 May
dust214–16-0.0419%3 May
inferno13–11-0.0421%30 Apr
mirage13–90.0630%26 Apr
dust213–9-0.0123%26 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0218%24 Apr
train0–7-0.010%22 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0324%19 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0114%17 Apr
mirage4–130.0518%17 Apr
mirage13–70.0620%16 Apr
dust213–80.0219%16 Apr
dust26–13-0.0018%15 Apr
inferno16–140.0122%15 Apr
anubis13–40.0543%15 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0029%14 Apr
ancient13–110.0313%13 Apr
dust29–13-0.0225%13 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0127%13 Apr
mirage13–160.0320%13 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0119%10 Apr
dust28–13-0.0131%9 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0515%8 Apr
ancient13–60.0416%7 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0617%7 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0235%31 Mar
dust213–60.0720%30 Mar
inferno13–80.0620%28 Mar
ancient13–50.0612%27 Mar
mirage7–130.0218%27 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0311%26 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0418%24 Mar
nuke4–13-0.1011%24 Mar
dust210–13-0.0414%24 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0434%23 Mar
mirage4–130.0011%23 Mar
dust28–13-0.0130%22 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0517%22 Mar
dust212–12-0.0426%22 Mar
mirage16–120.0619%22 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0719%22 Mar
dust213–9-0.0122%22 Mar
ancient6–13-0.068%20 Mar
nuke13–100.0530%20 Mar
dust211–130.0328%20 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0219%20 Mar
mirage13–110.0516%12 Mar
dust213–8-0.0413%11 Mar
mirage13–80.0121%11 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0217%10 Mar
dust211–13-0.0121%10 Mar
inferno6–130.0129%10 Mar
overpass13–5-0.0020%1 Mar
dust28–13-0.0222%1 Mar
inferno13–100.0025%1 Mar
mirage13–70.0826%1 Mar
dust27–13-0.0036%1 Mar
inferno13–90.0219%1 Mar
mirage13–70.0224%26 Sept
train13–50.0117%23 Sept
mirage13–00.0524%15 Aug
overpass13–7-0.0522%15 Aug
inferno7–130.0418%4 Aug
dust213–50.0120%3 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0610%1 May
inferno15–15-0.0314%30 Mar
dust213–100.0524%23 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →