Voightment

Voightment — CS2 Stats

US76561198119490312[U:1:159224584]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

634Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,270Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,817Blue band · top ~40% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,817 +53 3 Jun – 29 Oct · 21 days played
11,32316,917peak 16,9173 Jun29 Oct
17,128Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-06-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,100 below peak (16,917)
  • +93 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,893 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,183 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate54.3%42.0%44.4%above
Shot accuracy11.1%9.6%11.9%0.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.480.981.03above
Match win rate33.2%43.8%45.2%12.0% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVoightmentPREMIER12,817 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning63
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateWLWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility6.1
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.3
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time533ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 8 Jul →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · inferno, 12 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 29 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 1 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 13dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB199–1047%0.03
infernoA1710–759%0.01
anubisB157–847%0.03
mirageA138–562%0.04
dust2D133–1023%0.03
cacheB126–650%0.03
ancientA95–456%0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.25
train—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,849Lifetime kills
1.48K/D · Top 5% of Blue band
2,767Matches
33.2%Match win rate
54.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Blue band
11.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
3,682MVPs
813Hours (in match)
1,314Bombs planted
416Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,814dust2
1,931inferno
1,645nuke
956vertigo
314train
49cbble
31office
21bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
45.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
534msReaction time
53.8%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
8.42HE damage / grenade
10.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0317%1 Nov →
dust27–130.0120%29 Oct →
inferno13–100.008%29 Oct →
anubis7–130.0125%29 Oct →
mirage13–100.029%23 Oct →
dust213–50.019%17 Oct →
dust211–40.0514%17 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.053%16 Oct →
ancient4–130.0318%14 Oct →
cache7–00.0320%14 Oct →
anubis13–40.1313%14 Oct →
mirage13–110.0616%14 Oct →
dust26–130.0415%10 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.039%10 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0110%29 Sept →
anubis13–10.1822%29 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0214%23 Sept →
dust210–130.0218%16 Sept →
nuke0–90.037%16 Sept →
nuke7–130.0420%16 Sept →
mirage14–160.0218%16 Sept →
inferno4–130.0223%16 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0114%16 Sept →
nuke13–30.0522%9 Sept →
mirage13–90.0718%9 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0519%9 Sept →
anubis13–70.049%9 Sept →
inferno8–130.0219%9 Sept →
nuke6–130.0412%9 Sept →
inferno12–120.0413%2 Sept →
nuke13–00.1711%1 Sept →
anubis6–130.0224%26 Aug →
cache9–130.0422%26 Aug →
ancient13–100.024%26 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0118%26 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0310%26 Aug →
anubis13–40.0128%24 Aug →
mirage13–50.0813%19 Aug →
cache9–130.0317%19 Aug →
anubis13–50.076%19 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0118%19 Aug →
cache4–13-0.067%19 Aug →
mirage13–40.135%12 Aug →
ancient11–130.047%12 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0119%12 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0614%12 Aug →
inferno9–6-0.0330%12 Aug →
dust26–130.0812%5 Aug →
anubis8–130.0025%5 Aug →
mirage13–90.0120%5 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0113%5 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0215%5 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0013%3 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0811%29 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.042%29 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.019%29 Jul →
anubis6–130.0917%29 Jul →
overpass2–9-0.259%27 Jul →
cache13–90.0224%22 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.0117%22 Jul →
anubis13–60.0718%22 Jul →
inferno16–140.0318%22 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.0317%15 Jul →
nuke13–80.0215%15 Jul →
nuke13–90.109%15 Jul →
anubis5–130.0022%15 Jul →
nuke13–70.0715%15 Jul →
cache13–100.0730%15 Jul →
inferno9–7-0.0619%15 Jul →
mirage6–130.0426%8 Jul →
cache12–120.1618%8 Jul →
nuke13–60.0618%8 Jul →
train7–13-0.0320%8 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0227%8 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.0519%8 Jul →
inferno9–00.2627%8 Jul →
inferno3–9-0.1215%8 Jul →
cache13–50.1016%5 Jul →
inferno13–30.019%26 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.037%24 Jun →
ancient13–70.1118%24 Jun →
nuke13–50.049%24 Jun →
dust213–10.2313%24 Jun →
cache7–130.047%17 Jun →
mirage13–60.069%17 Jun →
dust28–130.0016%17 Jun →
inferno13–90.0213%17 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0213%17 Jun →
ancient12–16-0.0310%10 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0112%10 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.068%10 Jun →
inferno13–40.1316%10 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0022%10 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.0112%10 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0110%9 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.088%3 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0516%3 Jun →
nuke13–40.0728%3 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0111%3 Jun →
dust29–130.0615%3 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.