logisk

logisk — CS2 Stats

NO76561198119084979[U:1:158819251]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,599Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,507Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAll-Rounder
CSDB Leaderboard#62100 of 226670 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,000 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 15 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,001 +25 18 Mar26 May · 19 days played
20,58922,688peak 22,68818 Mar26 May
22,688Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,000Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-03-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,000
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 1 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=26,479), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate58.6%51.0%
Shot accuracy10.5%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.001.09
Match win rate53.7%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlogiskFACEITLevel 10 · 2,000 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,000csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning52
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56431Last 10056%Win rateWWWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.2
Utility3.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch4.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.2
Utility3.7
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time541ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 529ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 11 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · mirage, 4 May
375msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · mirage, 23 Apr
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 11 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26151158%-0.01
anubisA1811761%0.00
ancientA1811761%-0.01
nukeB115645%-0.00
dust2D103730%-0.00
cacheA85363%0.01
infernoS54180%0.03
overpass42250%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,154Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
1,351Matches
53.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players
58.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
10.5%Shot accuracy
4,209MVPs
688Hours (in match)
1,035Bombs planted
482Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-478,516
SSG 084,686
AWP2,834
Knife552

Lifetime map wins

1,316inferno
1,219nuke
829dust2
791vertigo
206train
12office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

568Matches
53%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
80.8ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7253%0.9915.5
Anubis4351%1.0015.2
Ancient3964%1.0315.6
Dust21937%0.9414.7
Nuke1958%1.0716.7
Inferno1443%1.0515.6
Cache967%1.1416.6
Overpass650%0.9013.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.6%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
549msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
51.5%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
6.46HE damage / grenade
2.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.5129 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1985% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–40.0844%14 Sept
anubis16–13-0.0022%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0618%1 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0725%30 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0822%26 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0329%25 Jun
ancient13–90.0224%25 Jun
anubis14–160.0220%25 Jun
nuke19–170.0532%25 Jun
nuke16–130.0224%1 Jun
mirage13–80.0415%26 May
mirage13–9-0.0220%26 May
anubis3–130.0036%25 May
overpass13–90.0830%23 May
dust26–13-0.0826%23 May
anubis13–8-0.0036%20 May
ancient13–7-0.0121%20 May
ancient13–100.0330%20 May
mirage5–130.0315%19 May
cache13–60.0411%19 May
cache13–50.0640%18 May
mirage9–13-0.0427%18 May
nuke6–13-0.0037%17 May
mirage13–6-0.0317%17 May
mirage11–13-0.0331%16 May
cache13–90.0725%16 May
mirage3–13-0.0421%16 May
mirage11–13-0.0336%16 May
cache13–110.0438%15 May
anubis13–7-0.0224%15 May
nuke4–130.0516%15 May
overpass10–13-0.0812%14 May
mirage13–50.0235%14 May
cache10–13-0.0039%14 May
anubis13–8-0.0221%14 May
dust29–130.0230%14 May
dust213–10-0.0223%14 May
ancient13–80.0111%14 May
dust25–13-0.0218%13 May
anubis13–90.0423%12 May
overpass12–16-0.0623%12 May
nuke13–60.0229%12 May
inferno11–130.0227%11 May
dust28–13-0.0216%11 May
mirage13–160.0030%11 May
anubis13–100.0115%11 May
anubis13–00.1435%11 May
ancient13–8-0.0532%11 May
ancient11–130.0132%10 May
ancient16–130.0117%10 May
anubis13–100.0529%10 May
dust213–100.0234%10 May
mirage3–13-0.0131%10 May
ancient13–100.0322%10 May
mirage13–90.0329%10 May
ancient9–13-0.0424%7 May
overpass13–6-0.0322%6 May
dust213–80.0835%6 May
cache13–3-0.0417%5 May
nuke13–90.0324%5 May
ancient9–13-0.0433%5 May
anubis11–13-0.0320%4 May
anubis7–13-0.0920%4 May
cache4–13-0.0520%4 May
mirage9–13-0.0650%4 May
cache15–19-0.0334%4 May
anubis13–60.0142%28 Apr
ancient13–60.0534%27 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0736%27 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0324%27 Apr
dust210–130.0337%26 Apr
mirage13–80.0328%23 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0623%22 Apr
mirage13–50.0325%22 Apr
dust25–13-0.0333%21 Apr
ancient13–90.0119%20 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0221%20 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0238%16 Apr
dust212–160.0146%15 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0329%14 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0122%13 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0430%9 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0035%8 Apr
anubis5–130.0120%8 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0523%7 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0130%1 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0039%31 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0716%31 Mar
mirage16–120.0127%30 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0238%30 Mar
anubis13–100.0428%30 Mar
mirage13–110.0433%30 Mar
inferno13–80.0910%30 Mar
mirage13–70.0633%27 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0418%27 Mar
ancient16–12-0.0021%24 Mar
anubis13–100.0030%24 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0030%18 Mar
mirage19–15-0.0429%17 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0129%15 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →