♡ Räuchertofurebellin ♡

♡ Räuchertofurebellin ♡ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198118269184[U:1:158003456]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,753Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,983Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 888 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,999 +107 6 Sept – 28 Oct · 18 days played
12,04614,999peak 14,9996 Sept28 Oct
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
888Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-09-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 888
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 13 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,999
  • +2,564 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate37.3%41.8%42.7%5.5% short
Shot accuracy12.6%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.710.980.990.28 short
Match win rate38.6%43.3%43.9%5.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♡ Räuchertofurebellin ♡FACEITLevel 3 · 888 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandPEAK ELO888csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36
Positioning53
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–46–9Last 10045%Win rateLLLWTLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · −29ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim3.6
Utility5.0
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 66% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6
Positioning5.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact9.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time599ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy14.6%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 20 Oct →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 30 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 18 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 26 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3716–2143%-0.03
ancientC188–1044%-0.04
anubisC166–1038%-0.03
nukeA159–660%-0.03
mirageC73–443%-0.04
cache—41–325%-0.06
inferno—32–167%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,664Lifetime kills
0.71K/D
6,154Matches
38.6%Match win rate
37.3%Headshot %
12.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
9,164MVPs
2,566Hours (in match)
12,322Bombs planted
1,374Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

SG 55313,421
AUG10,249
AK-476,019
MP94,887
MP74,459
MAC-103,104
AWP2,313

Lifetime map wins

31,447dust2
4,658nuke
4,536inferno
1,842vertigo
460train
301office
266cbble
30lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

123Matches
46%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
56.3ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21963%0.6710.9
Ancient1050%0.7510.1
Nuke875%0.8410.0
Mirage540%0.305.2
Anubis520%0.548.6
Inferno40%0.7812.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.9%Spray accuracy
69.7%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
616msReaction time
41.2%T opening success
30.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
6.87HE damage / grenade
4.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.8872% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0629%30 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0511%30 Oct →
dust211–130.0111%30 Oct →
anubis13–60.0318%29 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0419%29 Oct →
dust26–13-0.078%29 Oct →
dust213–11-0.046%29 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0116%28 Oct →
nuke13–60.0024%27 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0518%27 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0324%27 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0522%26 Oct →
dust213–30.0316%26 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0712%26 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0217%26 Oct →
dust213–10.0311%26 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0721%25 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.125%25 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0611%25 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0315%25 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0422%25 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0411%20 Oct →
dust26–13-0.035%20 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0415%20 Oct →
dust213–60.0619%20 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0215%20 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0313%20 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.067%18 Oct →
nuke2–4-0.0318%18 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0216%18 Oct →
ancient13–60.0511%18 Oct →
dust213–7-0.064%18 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0611%18 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0719%18 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0515%17 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0318%17 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0718%17 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.1019%17 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0210%17 Oct →
cache13–10-0.074%17 Oct →
anubis16–13-0.0221%17 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0410%16 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0711%16 Oct →
dust213–60.0317%16 Oct →
dust213–40.0512%16 Oct →
anubis12–12-0.0511%15 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0919%15 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0124%15 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0223%13 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0714%13 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0523%13 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0515%13 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0217%11 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0423%11 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.098%11 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0214%11 Oct →
anubis10–4-0.0211%11 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0112%11 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0317%11 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0213%9 Oct →
anubis5–130.0117%9 Oct →
nuke11–40.0113%9 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0620%9 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0517%8 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0618%8 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.009%8 Oct →
dust213–6-0.055%7 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0316%7 Oct →
ancient5–130.0220%6 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0520%6 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0613%6 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0212%4 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0310%4 Oct →
dust211–130.0115%4 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0417%4 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0221%3 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0314%3 Oct →
mirage6–130.0019%3 Oct →
anubis10–130.0123%3 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0119%3 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0617%3 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0613%3 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0515%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0518%3 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0312%1 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.1010%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0714%1 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0318%29 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0418%29 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0820%29 Sept →
dust213–70.0219%29 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0011%29 Sept →
nuke13–60.0215%27 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0725%27 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0212%27 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0414%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.074%27 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0113%26 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.039%26 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0118%26 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.