✡ Ⓨⓐⓒⓞⓥⓡⓔⓧ — CS2 Stats

IL76561198116115232[U:1:155849504]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,869Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

14,584Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating8.3 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating25,800Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1175 of 9340 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,407 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	44.1%	52.8%	8.6% short
Shot accuracy	18.1%	13.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.30	1.08	above
Match win rate	44.8%	49.2%	4.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning81

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–40–8Last 10052%Win rateWWWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.5

Aggression10.0

Utility4.6

Positioning8.1

Opening Duels7.0

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 72% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 72% on CT to 44% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning8.1

Utility4.6

Mechanics8.8

Opening Duels6.8

Win Impact7.4

Composite 8.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time555ms+54ms

first ⅓ avg 501ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms

Headshot accuracy30.2%−3.6%

first ⅓ avg 33.7% → last ⅓ avg 30.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–0Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

W4Current streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 46% over 37

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	37	17–20	46%	0.06
dust2	B	23	11–12	48%	0.05
anubis	S	15	10–5	67%	0.06
inferno	B	12	6–6	50%	0.04
cache	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
ancient	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
nuke	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 37). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

350,003Lifetime kills

1.30K/D · Top 25% of tracked players

9,895Matches

44.8%Match win rate

44.1%Headshot %

18.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of tracked players

40,502MVPs

5,209Hours (in match)

5,287Bombs planted

5,105Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47103,317

AWP98,145

M4A4 / M4A1-S33,415

Desert Eagle29,673

P2000 / USP-S16,285

Glock-188,911

Knife7,661

SSG 087,072

Tec-93,694

UMP-453,492

Lifetime map wins

30,132dust2

12,952inferno

7,818nuke

4,361vertigo

2,738train

2,260cbble

525lake

245office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,418Matches

51%Win rate

1.38Avg K/D

91.3ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	347	50%	1.38	20.6
Anubis	108	51%	1.26	18.4
Dust2	94	52%	1.40	19.9
Ancient	66	42%	1.13	16.6
Vertigo	58	52%	1.27	19.3
Inferno	51	47%	1.31	17.9
Nuke	48	46%	1.49	21.5
Overpass	27	44%	1.38	21.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.3%Headshot accuracy

40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.3%Spray accuracy

89.5%Counter-strafing

7.1°Preaim

557msReaction time

44.4%T opening success

71.7%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

15.2%Flash assists

9.90HE damage / grenade

3.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.5091 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–6	0.14	31%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	34%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	29%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	50%	22 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	23%	22 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.06	33%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.03	38%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	39%	14 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	25%	14 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.02	33%	14 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.05	29%	14 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.05	48%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.12	29%	13 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	30%	13 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.04	38%	13 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.01	17%	13 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.11	20%	11 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	21%	1 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	30%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	17%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	52%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	18%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.12	31%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.10	35%	1 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.05	30%	18 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.07	19%	18 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.08	21%	18 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.10	38%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	18%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.03	29%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.04	18%	18 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	37%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.08	32%	18 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.12	30%	13 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.03	14%	13 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.06	31%	13 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.08	19%	12 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.04	22%	11 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	17%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	36%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.02	24%	11 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	28%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.15	16%	11 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.04	18%	11 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.09	10%	11 Jul →
cache	6–1	-0.03	100%	11 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	29%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	26%	11 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	25%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.12	25%	11 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.04	29%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	21%	4 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.01	30%	4 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.09	24%	4 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.07	34%	4 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	17%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.13	25%	4 Jul →
overpass	4–13	0.05	40%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.05	32%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.08	31%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.07	20%	4 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.03	32%	3 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.01	26%	3 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.11	38%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.09	39%	3 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.05	17%	3 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.05	29%	3 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.03	16%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.04	21%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.16	33%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.15	44%	28 Jun →
dust2	2–13	0.01	22%	28 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.13	30%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.16	40%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.09	35%	28 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.04	31%	28 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.07	31%	27 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.04	36%	27 Jun →
inferno	4–13	0.01	58%	27 Jun →
mirage	14–16	0.16	33%	27 Jun →
anubis	15–15	0.07	27%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.14	35%	27 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.11	40%	27 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.03	39%	27 Jun →
dust2	0–13	0.00	26%	27 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.00	23%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.16	64%	27 Jun →
anubis	6–13	0.03	29%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.04	50%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.05	29%	27 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.04	37%	27 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.05	57%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.08	33%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–0	0.13	23%	27 Jun →
dust2	16–13	0.13	31%	27 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.08	37%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.06	32%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.09	21%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	27%	13 Jun →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	18%	13 Jun →