🎧TroubleMaker🎧

🎧TroubleMaker🎧 — CS2 Stats

PS76561198114250592[U:1:153984864]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

685Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,430Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#32536 of 261546 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 637 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 637 → 637
+3Tracked matches · now 685
−10.3ppWin rate · 44.8% → 34.5%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,058 +6,054 17 Jun – 3 Nov · 24 days played
17,91527,627peak 27,62717 Jun3 Nov
Faceit ELO: 637 +0 3 Sept – 3 Nov · 3 observations
637637peak 6373 Sept3 Nov
27,815Peak Premier in tracked matches
637Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 637
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 114 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate42.4%41.8%42.7%meets
Shot accuracy15.2%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.730.980.990.27 short
Match win rate58.4%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG🎧TroubleMaker🎧FACEITLevel 3 · 637 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO637csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning46
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLLLWLTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.6
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.06
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time578ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 9 Jul →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 1 Oct →
352msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 22 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 22 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3319–1458%0.01
infernoC229–1341%0.00
nukeC104–640%-0.01
mirageS107–370%0.03
cacheA95–456%0.01
anubisC83–538%0.01
ancient—44–0100%0.03
overpass—21–150%0.03
train—10–10%-0.07
vertigo—10–10%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

111,287Lifetime kills
0.73K/D
7,723Matches
58.4%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 3 players
42.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
11,325MVPs
2,263Hours (in match)
3,784Bombs planted
985Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP28,092
AK-4720,754
Molotov5,455
P903,572
SSG 082,841
Knife1,944

Lifetime map wins

10,982dust2
9,028inferno
2,247vertigo
2,019nuke
1,990train
177assault
163cbble
117office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

794Matches
48%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
74.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust211458%0.9613.8
Inferno6245%0.9214.1
Mirage2934%0.9915.1
Anubis2741%1.0614.1
Nuke2352%0.8613.8
Vertigo1747%0.9415.0
Ancient1443%0.7915.6
Cache1443%0.8815.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
76.0%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
580msReaction time
40.2%T opening success
27.2%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
12.11HE damage / grenade
6.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 27.2071% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–16-0.0418%12 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0316%11 Nov →
nuke1–13-0.0743%11 Nov →
overpass13–110.0421%1 Nov →
train8–13-0.0722%31 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0523%31 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.1116%24 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0322%24 Oct →
mirage10–6-0.0336%8 Oct →
cache13–160.0113%7 Oct →
inferno14–160.0219%3 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0164%1 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0810%26 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0832%25 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0043%8 Sept →
anubis17–19-0.0118%16 Aug →
inferno13–40.0423%15 Aug →
inferno13–100.0031%15 Aug →
dust24–130.0220%15 Aug →
dust213–40.0215%15 Aug →
inferno11–130.009%14 Aug →
dust213–100.0021%14 Aug →
nuke8–130.0439%14 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0912%11 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0014%9 Aug →
dust213–70.0055%8 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0333%8 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0625%1 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0215%26 Jul →
dust213–50.0124%26 Jul →
cache13–70.0216%26 Jul →
dust213–70.0514%25 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0143%25 Jul →
dust213–10.1524%22 Jul →
inferno13–00.000%22 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0430%22 Jul →
mirage13–100.0518%22 Jul →
mirage13–70.0620%22 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0214%21 Jul →
dust213–50.0132%21 Jul →
inferno8–00.0613%20 Jul →
nuke13–60.0331%20 Jul →
mirage13–50.0116%19 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0533%19 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0323%16 Jul →
ancient13–20.0013%16 Jul →
mirage9–130.0215%14 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.068%14 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0618%14 Jul →
vertigo6–90.1432%14 Jul →
dust210–130.0823%13 Jul →
mirage13–100.0217%13 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0711%13 Jul →
inferno13–100.0316%13 Jul →
cache13–2-0.0020%13 Jul →
ancient13–110.1320%13 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0440%13 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0814%12 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0314%12 Jul →
ancient16–12-0.0515%12 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0336%12 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0230%12 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0327%12 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0925%12 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0910%12 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0710%12 Jul →
dust213–70.1634%9 Jul →
mirage13–20.0211%9 Jul →
nuke13–100.0227%9 Jul →
cache11–130.0726%9 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0314%9 Jul →
cache16–130.0426%9 Jul →
cache12–120.0624%7 Jul →
dust213–110.0436%5 Jul →
inferno13–60.0823%5 Jul →
anubis13–90.0527%5 Jul →
inferno13–80.1025%4 Jul →
mirage13–160.0017%4 Jul →
dust213–60.0320%3 Jul →
inferno13–30.0424%3 Jul →
ancient16–140.0224%2 Jul →
mirage13–50.1527%2 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0419%30 Jun →
overpass13–160.0125%30 Jun →
anubis13–110.0526%29 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0224%29 Jun →
inferno10–130.0517%29 Jun →
nuke13–70.0816%29 Jun →
dust216–140.0120%29 Jun →
dust213–70.0316%29 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0120%18 Jun →
dust22–13-0.0317%18 Jun →
inferno3–130.0716%18 Jun →
nuke7–130.019%18 Jun →
dust213–50.0825%18 Jun →
dust213–70.0716%18 Jun →
anubis14–160.0020%18 Jun →
dust213–110.1219%18 Jun →
inferno7–130.0631%18 Jun →
anubis13–90.0822%17 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.