|✪|◥◣Alber7meis7er◢◤|

|✪|◥◣Alber7meis7er◢◤| — CS2 Stats

IM76561198109592566[U:1:149326838]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,162Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
10,349Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,236Blue band · top ~53.6% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−795Premier CS Rating · 11,031 → 10,236

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,236 -1,590 1 Oct – 4 Nov · 24 days played
8,08911,826peak 11,8261 Oct4 Nov
11,939Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,159Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-10-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,159
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 42 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,590 below peak (11,826)
  • -487 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,764 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate39.3%42.0%44.4%5.1% short
Shot accuracy16.2%9.6%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.980.981.030.05 short
Match win rate44.9%43.8%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG|✪|◥◣Alber7meis7er◢◤|PREMIER10,236 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,159csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning64
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateLLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning6.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels8.5
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time639ms+40ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–11 · anubis, 17 Oct →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · inferno, 18 Oct →
484msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · ancient, 18 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 19 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L5Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2311–1248%0.01
mirageB178–947%-0.02
anubisD165–1131%0.02
infernoA1610–663%0.01
ancientS128–467%-0.00
cacheD93–633%0.01
nukeA74–357%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

259,277Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
14,748Matches
44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Blue band
39.3%Headshot %
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Blue band
27,882MVPs
6,035Hours (in match)
12,792Bombs planted
2,072Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4763,715
AWP43,377
FAMAS5,297
SSG 084,698
P2503,877

Lifetime map wins

39,229inferno
21,851italy
20,442dust2
3,867nuke
2,493vertigo
2,435office
1,922cbble
1,702train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

543Matches
49%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
78.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno9158%0.9215.5
Mirage7043%0.8914.7
Anubis3941%0.7712.8
Dust23735%0.8814.9
Vertigo2861%0.8312.3
Ancient2843%0.7913.5
Nuke1839%0.8414.1
Overpass1050%0.8010.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
644msReaction time
67.7%T opening success
60.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
9.89HE damage / grenade
10.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0115%4 Nov →
anubis11–13-0.0211%3 Nov →
dust29–130.0327%3 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0511%3 Nov →
nuke5–13-0.0528%2 Nov →
dust213–60.0611%2 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0011%2 Nov →
nuke13–30.0621%2 Nov →
mirage12–16-0.0328%2 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0715%2 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.029%2 Nov →
inferno13–30.0117%2 Nov →
anubis15–15-0.0219%2 Nov →
ancient13–6-0.049%2 Nov →
cache13–110.0315%2 Nov →
inferno13–70.0117%2 Nov →
dust213–30.0612%2 Nov →
dust213–90.0512%1 Nov →
mirage15–15-0.0222%1 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0312%1 Nov →
mirage13–40.0126%1 Nov →
cache11–130.0027%31 Oct →
cache7–130.0710%31 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.047%31 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0119%31 Oct →
mirage16–140.0419%31 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0311%31 Oct →
anubis13–70.027%31 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0727%31 Oct →
ancient13–100.0011%30 Oct →
inferno9–130.0014%25 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.047%25 Oct →
ancient13–70.1016%25 Oct →
inferno13–80.0315%25 Oct →
inferno13–100.0214%24 Oct →
dust210–130.0025%24 Oct →
dust213–30.1123%24 Oct →
cache9–130.0116%24 Oct →
nuke13–90.0417%24 Oct →
inferno11–130.0215%23 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0011%23 Oct →
dust213–100.0221%23 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0827%23 Oct →
cache11–130.0512%22 Oct →
anubis7–130.0016%21 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.029%21 Oct →
anubis13–100.0529%21 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0521%21 Oct →
anubis7–130.0322%19 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.106%19 Oct →
nuke13–1-0.0010%19 Oct →
cache4–13-0.098%18 Oct →
inferno13–20.0531%18 Oct →
dust216–140.0112%18 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0123%18 Oct →
mirage11–130.0317%18 Oct →
inferno13–50.039%18 Oct →
mirage13–80.019%18 Oct →
cache13–30.009%18 Oct →
ancient13–80.028%18 Oct →
anubis13–70.1117%17 Oct →
inferno13–70.0814%17 Oct →
anubis13–110.1216%17 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0216%17 Oct →
dust215–150.0613%17 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0117%17 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.036%16 Oct →
dust29–130.0128%14 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0021%14 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0110%12 Oct →
dust23–60.027%12 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0215%12 Oct →
cache13–10-0.018%12 Oct →
mirage13–110.0222%11 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.065%11 Oct →
cache9–130.0516%11 Oct →
anubis9–130.0519%11 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.046%11 Oct →
inferno13–40.0515%11 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0520%11 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0122%11 Oct →
nuke7–130.0418%11 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0321%11 Oct →
dust215–150.0117%10 Oct →
dust29–130.0311%10 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0124%9 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0616%9 Oct →
mirage13–50.1215%8 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0426%8 Oct →
inferno11–130.0819%3 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0217%3 Oct →
inferno13–90.0715%3 Oct →
anubis13–110.0515%3 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.037%3 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.027%3 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0623%2 Oct →
ancient13–10.1019%2 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0511%2 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.1213%2 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0323%1 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.