☯Yumi夕実

☯Yumi夕実 — CS2 Stats

CH76561198108870409[U:1:148604681]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,068Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,752Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,068 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 3 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,042 +24 6 Feb5 Apr · 27 days played
20,96023,340peak 23,3406 Feb5 Apr
23,841Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,899Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-02-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,899
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 102 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 15 Sep 2026 and 21 Sep 2026.

Measured 15 Sep 202621 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG☯Yumi夕実PEAK ELO1,899csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning49
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49483Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility3.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.9
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time600ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+5.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–11 · cache, 1 Aug
45%Best headshot accuracy · 5–11 · nuke, 7 Feb
438msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 3 Apr
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 5 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB168850%-0.01
ancientA1610663%-0.01
overpassB147750%0.01
infernoS128467%-0.01
cacheB105550%0.00
nukeD103730%-0.01
dust2D82625%-0.02
mirageC52340%-0.01
office31233%0.02
vertigo21150%0.02
fachwerk110100%-0.04
italy110100%-0.03
alpine1010%-0.01
warden1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

152,619Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
7,106Matches
46.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
40.1%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
26,063MVPs
2,921Hours (in match)
7,126Bombs planted
1,835Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,496
AWP13,079
SG 5539,992
AUG8,375
UMP-453,778
P2503,264

Lifetime map wins

12,193inferno
5,956office
4,885dust2
2,606cbble
2,287nuke
2,006train
1,425vertigo
601italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,176Matches
51%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
78.9ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12352%1.0616.3
Anubis10359%1.1517.2
Inferno6851%1.0816.9
Dust25042%1.0016.2
Nuke3043%0.9113.8
Overpass2850%1.2217.2
Mirage2326%0.9514.9
Vertigo2259%1.2816.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
595msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
34.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
10.13HE damage / grenade
3.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.7831 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.8166% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache1–13-0.0816%13 Sept
cache13–40.089%13 Sept
dust213–4-0.0143%13 Sept
cache13–30.0027%12 Sept
cache4–13-0.0220%12 Sept
fachwerk13–4-0.0429%12 Sept
cache2–13-0.0836%9 Aug
italy13–9-0.0312%5 Aug
anubis13–70.0115%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0620%1 Aug
cache13–110.0925%1 Aug
office10–130.0111%1 Aug
vertigo10–130.0436%24 May
cache13–100.0630%22 May
cache7–13-0.0624%8 May
cache9–130.0338%1 May
cache13–90.0215%24 Apr
overpass13–10.0622%5 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0517%5 Apr
inferno13–60.0017%3 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0328%2 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0220%1 Apr
anubis13–70.029%29 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0117%29 Mar
dust212–12-0.0710%28 Mar
office13–100.0029%28 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0113%26 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0827%25 Mar
anubis13–60.0618%25 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0613%21 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0619%21 Mar
inferno13–80.0222%20 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0418%20 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0414%20 Mar
overpass13–90.0718%20 Mar
dust29–130.0020%18 Mar
dust215–150.0211%16 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0317%16 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0111%16 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0232%15 Mar
overpass9–13-0.039%15 Mar
nuke2–13-0.0818%15 Mar
anubis2–0-0.110%15 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0122%13 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0613%10 Mar
ancient4–13-0.095%10 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0113%9 Mar
anubis13–110.0216%9 Mar
office4–130.0412%6 Mar
overpass13–70.0116%4 Mar
ancient13–60.0111%4 Mar
ancient10–130.0316%2 Mar
dust214–16-0.0313%2 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0214%27 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0411%27 Feb
ancient13–70.0112%25 Feb
ancient13–1-0.0315%22 Feb
inferno16–130.0315%22 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0227%22 Feb
nuke13–90.0517%21 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0221%21 Feb
nuke13–50.0416%21 Feb
anubis13–100.0211%21 Feb
alpine12–12-0.0114%20 Feb
vertigo13–8-0.004%20 Feb
overpass13–70.0917%19 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0511%18 Feb
inferno13–50.0719%16 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0622%16 Feb
anubis2–13-0.0810%14 Feb
overpass13–110.0311%14 Feb
ancient13–10.0616%14 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0119%13 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0015%13 Feb
overpass2–13-0.046%12 Feb
dust29–13-0.0323%12 Feb
anubis9–130.0315%12 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0115%10 Feb
mirage4–13-0.069%9 Feb
warden4–130.0331%8 Feb
ancient8–130.0115%7 Feb
overpass6–130.0511%7 Feb
nuke5–11-0.0045%7 Feb
ancient13–3-0.038%7 Feb
inferno13–10.0220%7 Feb
dust24–13-0.1016%7 Feb
ancient13–1-0.0025%7 Feb
anubis13–20.009%7 Feb
mirage13–30.0120%7 Feb
inferno7–13-0.087%7 Feb
mirage7–13-0.038%6 Feb
nuke13–80.0114%6 Feb
ancient13–110.0116%6 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0010%6 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0016%6 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0320%5 Feb
dust213–20.0322%5 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0219%3 Feb
overpass13–40.0010%3 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0411%3 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →