blackstorm

blackstorm — CS2 Stats

CH76561198081286740[U:1:121021012]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,997Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,353 → 2,353
+9Tracked matches · now 2,997
0.0ppWin rate · 46.7% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 21 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +360 21 Apr2 Jun · 13 days played
22,83825,497peak 25,49721 Apr2 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,353 +0 3 Sept14 Sept · 3 observations
2,3532,353peak 2,3533 Sept14 Sept
25,497Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,353Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-04-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,353
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 147 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGblackstormPEAK ELO2,353csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning55
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +7.2pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility4.8
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch4.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 34% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.5
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time561ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 18 May
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · ancient, 15 Sept
398msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 21 Apr
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 18 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 13nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB1991047%0.01
ancientC1661038%0.01
cacheB168850%0.01
overpassA148657%0.02
infernoA138562%0.02
nukeD103730%0.01
mirageD62433%-0.01
dust243175%0.01
fachwerk220100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

999Matches
53%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
83.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient18750%1.1816.5
Anubis17862%1.2216.8
Inferno12257%1.2017.2
Dust210051%1.1316.0
Overpass7842%1.1416.9
Nuke6849%1.5118.0
Mirage5046%1.1015.3
Vertigo4159%1.0514.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
562msReaction time
56.9%T opening success
34.2%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
5.74HE damage / grenade
13.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.1509% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–160.0222%16 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0016%15 Sept
ancient13–60.0334%15 Sept
anubis13–50.1025%15 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0130%14 Sept
cache1–13-0.0923%13 Sept
cache13–40.0127%13 Sept
dust213–40.1430%13 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0032%13 Sept
cache4–13-0.0327%13 Sept
cache13–30.1019%12 Sept
cache4–130.0419%12 Sept
fachwerk13–40.0810%12 Sept
ancient13–90.0022%6 Sept
anubis13–80.0318%6 Sept
fachwerk13–110.1127%5 Sept
cache14–16-0.0523%5 Sept
anubis19–170.0619%18 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0823%17 Aug
cache5–13-0.0814%17 Aug
nuke13–80.0316%17 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0124%5 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0418%21 Jun
cache8–130.0523%21 Jun
ancient5–13-0.059%21 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0128%17 Jun
overpass8–130.0119%9 Jun
cache16–130.0311%8 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0024%3 Jun
cache12–16-0.0121%3 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0213%2 Jun
anubis13–50.0719%2 Jun
nuke13–60.0628%2 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0214%2 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0422%1 Jun
ancient10–130.0216%1 Jun
ancient13–100.0018%1 Jun
nuke8–130.0331%1 Jun
overpass14–160.0217%31 May
mirage2–13-0.0530%31 May
nuke11–130.0311%31 May
inferno10–13-0.0510%27 May
inferno2–130.0021%26 May
overpass10–13-0.0325%26 May
overpass9–13-0.0412%24 May
dust213–10-0.0222%24 May
anubis13–60.0819%24 May
inferno13–100.0829%24 May
overpass13–70.0814%24 May
ancient10–13-0.028%23 May
mirage13–100.0423%23 May
overpass13–90.1218%23 May
dust213–6-0.070%23 May
inferno13–100.0129%22 May
overpass13–80.0013%22 May
cache13–100.0532%22 May
anubis13–9-0.0116%21 May
cache13–60.0522%21 May
nuke7–13-0.0332%20 May
overpass7–13-0.0314%19 May
inferno13–100.0226%19 May
overpass16–12-0.0119%19 May
anubis13–8-0.0026%18 May
ancient11–130.0418%18 May
inferno13–10.2019%18 May
mirage15–150.0524%17 May
nuke9–13-0.0017%17 May
inferno5–130.0219%17 May
ancient10–130.1129%17 May
mirage2–12-0.0733%16 May
anubis11–130.0111%16 May
mirage13–8-0.0416%30 Apr
dust21–13-0.0425%30 Apr
cache13–11-0.0027%29 Apr
cache13–90.0619%29 Apr
ancient3–13-0.1211%28 Apr
nuke11–130.0123%28 Apr
anubis17–19-0.0116%28 Apr
inferno13–100.0219%28 Apr
ancient13–50.0923%28 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0314%27 Apr
nuke13–40.0324%27 Apr
overpass13–50.056%27 Apr
ancient13–50.0624%27 Apr
cache12–160.0112%26 Apr
anubis15–15-0.0113%26 Apr
cache13–9-0.0213%24 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0125%24 Apr
anubis17–190.0020%23 Apr
ancient7–130.0518%23 Apr
inferno13–70.0120%23 Apr
overpass10–130.0216%23 Apr
overpass13–40.0726%22 Apr
inferno11–130.0220%22 Apr
ancient10–130.037%22 Apr
anubis13–20.0414%22 Apr
inferno9–70.0214%22 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0313%21 Apr
inferno13–70.0424%21 Apr
overpass22–19-0.0210%21 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →