YummyCheesyMeaty

YummyCheesyMeaty — CS2 Stats

CH76561198125149104[U:1:164883376]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

764Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 24 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,811 +287 24 Mar24 May · 16 days played
17,09919,999peak 19,99924 Mar24 May
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,192Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-01-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,192
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 9 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYummyCheesyMeatyPEAK ELO1,192csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning57
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54433Last 10054%Win rateLLWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.7
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time598ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 14 Apr
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 9 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · inferno, 18 May
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 18 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2113862%-0.01
infernoB168850%-0.01
anubisS1510567%-0.00
overpassA159660%0.00
nukeD124833%-0.02
dust2D72529%-0.03
cacheA53260%0.00
mirageA53260%0.00
alpine21150%-0.01
poseidon1010%-0.10
train110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

311Matches
52%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
73.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3959%1.0615.4
Inferno3345%0.9513.3
Ancient2952%0.7912.9
Mirage2055%1.2516.4
Dust22055%0.9714.3
Overpass1942%1.1318.1
Nuke1662%1.1414.5
Cache1060%1.2616.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
595msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
9.20HE damage / grenade
3.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4006 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2911% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.029%11 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0520%9 Aug
cache13–3-0.0138%9 Aug
inferno13–100.0120%9 Aug
anubis8–130.0216%9 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0223%9 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0019%9 Aug
anubis13–60.0214%31 Jul
ancient16–130.0318%31 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0224%31 Jul
dust215–15-0.0614%15 Jul
overpass19–15-0.0113%27 May
inferno10–13-0.0820%27 May
overpass10–130.0716%26 May
inferno11–13-0.0313%25 May
cache7–13-0.0326%25 May
cache13–10-0.0125%25 May
overpass9–13-0.0229%24 May
dust213–100.0335%24 May
anubis13–6-0.0521%24 May
overpass13–70.0022%23 May
mirage13–100.0227%23 May
ancient11–13-0.0312%18 May
inferno13–10.0522%18 May
nuke9–13-0.0226%17 May
inferno5–13-0.0615%17 May
ancient10–130.0023%17 May
mirage2–12-0.0729%16 May
anubis11–130.0212%16 May
anubis13–11-0.0212%16 May
ancient5–13-0.0818%16 May
nuke13–30.0619%15 May
inferno11–13-0.0112%15 May
ancient13–5-0.0115%15 May
overpass13–100.0510%14 May
ancient13–7-0.0419%14 May
inferno13–110.0219%14 May
dust213–6-0.0118%13 May
cache13–110.0326%13 May
overpass16–140.0315%5 May
inferno13–7-0.0222%3 May
ancient5–13-0.0430%3 May
nuke11–13-0.0227%28 Apr
anubis17–19-0.0216%28 Apr
inferno13–100.0325%28 Apr
cache12–160.0328%26 Apr
nuke9–130.0125%25 Apr
ancient12–160.009%25 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0418%15 Apr
anubis13–30.0218%15 Apr
ancient13–1-0.0517%15 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0020%14 Apr
anubis13–100.029%14 Apr
dust215–15-0.0214%14 Apr
ancient13–20.1432%14 Apr
ancient13–10-0.016%12 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0424%12 Apr
inferno13–40.0522%12 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0221%12 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0813%11 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0213%11 Apr
overpass13–5-0.0411%11 Apr
overpass13–110.0721%10 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0318%10 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0225%7 Apr
dust21–13-0.1022%7 Apr
poseidon5–9-0.1025%7 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0320%6 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0510%6 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0111%6 Apr
ancient13–40.0421%6 Apr
nuke13–50.0217%6 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0321%3 Apr
anubis13–80.0315%3 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0115%2 Apr
dust27–13-0.0425%24 Mar
overpass13–4-0.0216%24 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0712%24 Feb
train13–9-0.0414%21 Feb
nuke13–90.009%21 Feb
nuke3–13-0.0820%21 Feb
inferno12–160.0120%19 Feb
anubis13–3-0.0110%19 Feb
overpass13–7-0.0011%19 Feb
overpass15–15-0.0111%16 Feb
overpass9–13-0.0413%16 Feb
dust23–130.0122%16 Feb
mirage11–30.129%15 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0319%14 Feb
anubis2–13-0.0529%14 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0219%11 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0424%11 Feb
nuke16–12-0.0222%11 Feb
ancient16–120.0217%10 Feb
anubis13–110.0320%8 Feb
inferno16–130.0219%7 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0513%7 Feb
alpine13–40.0027%1 Feb
anubis8–130.0117%25 Jan
alpine11–13-0.0222%24 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →