Maps with sand are the best.

Maps with sand are the best. — CS2 Stats

76561198107104129[U:1:146838401]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,016Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,875Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#80683 of 259586 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,734 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,123 -1,545 24 Apr – 6 Jun · 15 days played
19,72921,693peak 21,69324 Apr6 Jun
22,021Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,734Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-04-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,734
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 17 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate49.4%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy9.5%12.7%13.0%3.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.051.060.20 short
Match win rate44.0%45.7%46.3%2.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMaps with sand are the be…FACEITLevel 7 · 1,734 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,734csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning60
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateWLWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 34% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning6.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time529ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 1 Aug →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · inferno, 29 Jul →
297msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 12 May →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 24 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 13nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3518–1751%0.01
anubisA2313–1057%0.01
infernoB158–753%0.01
dust2S139–469%-0.01
nukeD82–625%0.00
ancient—31–233%0.00
cache—31–233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

108,090Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
4,681Matches
44.0%Match win rate
49.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
9.5%Shot accuracy
10,927MVPs
6,601Hours (in match)
4,374Bombs planted
1,631Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,374
AWP13,153
MP93,856
Knife1,776
MAC-101,480

Lifetime map wins

5,401dust2
4,347inferno
1,514nuke
715vertigo
363lake
296cbble
271train
194bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

524Matches
52%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
73.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19154%1.0515.2
Anubis7755%1.0415.4
Dust24333%0.7912.2
Inferno3551%0.9313.8
Nuke3355%1.0815.7
Ancient729%1.0215.4
Train1100%0.7915.0
Cache10%0.425.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
520msReaction time
52.0%T opening success
34.4%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
9.87HE damage / grenade
12.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.3837% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–5-0.0119%2 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.0018%26 Oct →
mirage13–110.0119%27 Sept →
ancient13–80.0526%27 Sept →
anubis9–130.0112%15 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.069%13 Sept →
mirage13–110.0117%13 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0319%13 Sept →
anubis8–130.0917%13 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0217%12 Sept →
anubis13–40.0310%12 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0419%9 Sept →
mirage4–130.0228%9 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0118%4 Sept →
mirage10–130.0017%31 Aug →
anubis12–160.0125%27 Aug →
dust213–110.0320%26 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0228%24 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0622%24 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0121%23 Aug →
mirage13–110.0226%21 Aug →
anubis13–50.0926%14 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0320%14 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0023%13 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0214%11 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0638%7 Aug →
inferno9–40.2029%1 Aug →
inferno8–80.0223%1 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.1113%1 Aug →
dust22–13-0.1010%30 Jul →
inferno9–70.0839%29 Jul →
inferno13–100.0221%18 Jul →
nuke13–30.1624%12 Jul →
mirage13–50.0733%11 Jul →
mirage13–60.0721%11 Jul →
mirage13–60.0914%9 Jul →
inferno13–60.1015%9 Jul →
mirage13–40.0411%9 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0524%8 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0412%8 Jul →
anubis19–170.0524%7 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.029%7 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0127%7 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0028%7 Jul →
inferno13–100.0226%30 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0231%30 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0419%28 Jun →
nuke13–90.0123%27 Jun →
anubis13–100.0225%26 Jun →
dust213–80.0538%20 Jun →
inferno16–140.0427%20 Jun →
mirage16–130.0123%17 Jun →
mirage18–220.0121%17 Jun →
inferno5–9-0.0123%13 Jun →
inferno7–90.0413%13 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0125%6 Jun →
anubis13–110.0118%5 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.049%3 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0435%3 Jun →
dust213–110.0226%3 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0212%3 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0618%1 Jun →
mirage14–160.0318%1 Jun →
dust213–50.0126%1 Jun →
anubis16–130.0211%1 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0023%1 Jun →
mirage11–130.0217%1 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0519%1 Jun →
dust213–60.0627%28 May →
mirage13–90.0918%27 May →
mirage13–9-0.0032%27 May →
mirage13–50.0915%26 May →
dust211–4-0.0522%26 May →
anubis13–90.0633%24 May →
dust213–5-0.0424%24 May →
nuke4–13-0.0818%24 May →
cache8–130.0127%24 May →
mirage13–40.0921%24 May →
mirage9–130.0515%20 May →
nuke4–130.0431%20 May →
inferno15–15-0.0623%19 May →
ancient8–13-0.0324%19 May →
cache10–13-0.0421%13 May →
anubis8–130.0423%12 May →
inferno3–13-0.1113%12 May →
mirage5–13-0.0219%12 May →
anubis13–5-0.0117%12 May →
nuke7–13-0.0217%2 May →
mirage13–4-0.0229%2 May →
anubis6–13-0.0523%1 May →
cache13–7-0.0319%29 Apr →
anubis14–160.0225%27 Apr →
anubis16–12-0.0017%25 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.0619%25 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0432%25 Apr →
mirage13–60.0524%25 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.0417%24 Apr →
anubis3–9-0.047%24 Apr →
mirage13–20.0512%24 Apr →
inferno12–160.0117%24 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.