Bozo3000

Bozo3000 — CS2 Stats

US76561198105085268[U:1:144819540]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

785Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,620Hours in CS63Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3 · 696 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,999 +11,699 2 Jan – 1 Feb · 10 days played
3,30014,999peak 14,9992 Jan1 Feb
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
696Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-01-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 696
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 55 to go
  • Reached: Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,259), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate46.7%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy15.5%12.2%11.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.840.980.990.15 short
Match win rate41.4%43.3%43.9%2.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBozo3000FACEITLevel 3 · 696 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO696csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning54
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–56Last 10044%Win rateWLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility2.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.4
Utility2.8
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time614ms−84ms
first ⅓ avg 698ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy12.6%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 11–0 · dust2, 17 Sept →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 22 Jan →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 20 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 22anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2214–864%0.01
dust2A1810–856%-0.01
nukeC167–944%-0.02
ancientD133–1023%-0.00
cacheC125–742%-0.00
infernoC104–640%-0.02
anubisD71–614%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%0.03
overpass—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,682Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
2,448Matches
41.4%Match win rate
46.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
15.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
5,822MVPs
1,234Hours (in match)
3,096Bombs planted
592Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,548
AWP5,024
P2501,478
Knife1,203
FAMAS1,063

Lifetime map wins

6,455dust2
4,711inferno
959nuke
699cbble
505vertigo
403train
67office
42assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

690Matches
49%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
79.6ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11157%1.0915.2
Dust28237%1.0315.9
Inferno6444%0.9915.3
Anubis3348%0.9814.5
Nuke3250%0.9114.6
Ancient3250%0.9516.0
Cache3139%1.0616.6
Train743%0.8312.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
621msReaction time
34.0%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
8.01HE damage / grenade
1.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.8136% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3752 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.0082% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage19–150.078%13 Oct →
cache7–13-0.096%12 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0313%12 Oct →
cache4–13-0.077%12 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0112%10 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0310%8 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0519%6 Oct →
dust213–90.0618%6 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.047%5 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0212%4 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.080%4 Oct →
anubis9–130.048%4 Oct →
dust26–13-0.098%4 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0115%2 Oct →
mirage13–60.0116%1 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0919%1 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0314%1 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0524%30 Sept →
mirage10–130.009%30 Sept →
nuke13–90.004%30 Sept →
nuke13–60.028%29 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0810%29 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.047%29 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0223%27 Sept →
dust28–130.0324%26 Sept →
cache11–130.0026%26 Sept →
anubis13–70.0420%24 Sept →
cache13–3-0.020%23 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0521%23 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0111%22 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0815%22 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.018%21 Sept →
cache13–70.0616%21 Sept →
mirage13–110.0318%21 Sept →
ancient13–70.0112%20 Sept →
cache13–10.0310%20 Sept →
inferno13–20.0811%20 Sept →
ancient13–70.0013%19 Sept →
cache9–130.039%19 Sept →
dust213–70.0622%18 Sept →
cache4–13-0.039%18 Sept →
dust211–00.1312%17 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0114%17 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0115%17 Sept →
nuke13–40.028%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0114%16 Sept →
cache13–90.0112%16 Sept →
cache8–130.0714%15 Sept →
dust24–11-0.140%14 Sept →
dust24–130.0223%14 Sept →
mirage14–160.0219%14 Sept →
cache25–22-0.0115%13 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0415%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0211%13 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0323%12 Sept →
anubis2–100.0114%12 Sept →
ancient5–130.068%12 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0113%12 Sept →
ancient6–130.0710%12 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.066%11 Sept →
mirage9–130.0217%11 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0415%11 Sept →
mirage13–90.0313%10 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.045%9 Sept →
mirage13–110.0119%8 Sept →
nuke7–130.039%8 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0618%8 Sept →
ancient2–9-0.130%7 Sept →
dust29–20.0212%1 Feb →
mirage13–60.0111%1 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.068%1 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0912%1 Feb →
dust28–13-0.103%29 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0511%29 Jan →
inferno8–13-0.008%29 Jan →
ancient13–30.0218%29 Jan →
dust25–130.029%28 Jan →
inferno13–60.0113%28 Jan →
dust213–7-0.0113%28 Jan →
dust213–8-0.0518%27 Jan →
mirage13–100.0216%26 Jan →
mirage13–30.0519%22 Jan →
mirage13–50.0730%22 Jan →
overpass4–13-0.0613%19 Jan →
mirage13–90.0010%18 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0110%17 Jan →
nuke13–80.0915%17 Jan →
dust22–13-0.0813%16 Jan →
inferno13–50.089%16 Jan →
ancient14–160.0716%13 Jan →
dust213–80.0017%12 Jan →
dust213–110.0616%12 Jan →
nuke6–13-0.0516%4 Jan →
nuke13–8-0.0311%4 Jan →
mirage13–5-0.0015%4 Jan →
inferno13–7-0.108%3 Jan →
ancient8–130.058%3 Jan →
mirage13–100.077%3 Jan →
mirage13–110.059%2 Jan →
nuke4–13-0.0630%2 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.