𐌁𐌄₦†𐌑 — CS2 Stats

76561198104021129[U:1:143755401]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,098Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,801Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player

Premier CS Rating16,856Purple band · top ~21% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#116988 of 239620 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 23 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,856 -1,864 23 Jun – 19 Sept · 24 days played

19,103Peak Premier in tracked matches

38Days played since 2026-06-23

Premier CS Rating

2,247 below peak (19,103)
-150 over 30 days · steady
-1,864 over 90 days
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,144 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	47.6%	43.8%	44.8%	above
Shot accuracy	15.6%	12.0%	12.5%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.98	1.02	1.03	0.05 short
Match win rate	47.1%	44.7%	45.2%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning59

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–51–6Last 10043%Win rateLWLWLTLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

4–5–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

8–10–2 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 517ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.7

Utility5.3

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels3.4

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 62% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning5.9

Utility5.3

Mechanics2.6

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time519ms−126ms

first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms

Headshot accuracy26.1%+4.8%

first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 10 Sept →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–4 · cache, 27 Aug →

359msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 27 Aug →

13–1Biggest win · mirage, 15 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 35% over 26

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	26	9–17	35%	0.01
dust2	C	20	7–13	35%	-0.02
inferno	C	18	7–11	39%	0.02
cache	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.00
nuke	S	6	4–2	67%	0.05
anubis	S	5	4–1	80%	0.01
office	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.04
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

118,857Lifetime kills

0.98K/D

5,511Matches

47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players

47.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players

15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players

20,510MVPs

2,159Hours (in match)

3,975Bombs planted

3,837Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,001

AWP16,492

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,874

Desert Eagle13,360

Glock-186,113

P2000 / USP-S5,965

SSG 082,729

Knife2,135

Galil AR2,102

MAC-101,638

Lifetime map wins

10,824inferno

9,471dust2

3,714train

3,111nuke

2,985vertigo

372office

236cbble

205lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

237Matches

51%Win rate

0.69Avg K/D

50.5ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy

33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.4%Spray accuracy

61.7%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

528msReaction time

39.3%T opening success

50.8%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

2.4%Flash assists

15.06HE damage / grenade

5.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4702 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.3278% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	7–13	0.01	9%	19 Sept →
office	13–7	0.03	33%	19 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	19%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.02	17%	19 Sept →
nuke	10–13	0.07	36%	16 Sept →
mirage	15–15	0.03	20%	15 Sept →
office	6–13	-0.01	32%	11 Sept →
cache	13–10	-0.02	28%	11 Sept →
italy	13–8	-0.01	26%	11 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.06	25%	11 Sept →
inferno	4–9	-0.03	33%	10 Sept →
inferno	9–7	-0.00	14%	10 Sept →
inferno	6–9	0.01	40%	10 Sept →
mirage	14–16	0.02	27%	10 Sept →
inferno	9–4	0.07	29%	10 Sept →
inferno	9–7	0.25	18%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	8%	10 Sept →
cache	15–15	-0.01	15%	9 Sept →
office	9–13	0.00	30%	9 Sept →
cache	4–13	-0.04	32%	9 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	36%	9 Sept →
cache	3–13	-0.04	31%	9 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.04	33%	2 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	28%	2 Sept →
mirage	15–15	0.05	23%	30 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.03	18%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	40%	29 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	20%	29 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	29%	29 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.00	11%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.00	29%	27 Aug →
cache	6–4	-0.01	50%	27 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	24%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.08	26%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.10	18%	24 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.01	25%	24 Aug →
fachwerk	13–11	-0.00	21%	22 Aug →
boulder	13–4	-0.01	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	25%	22 Aug →
mirage	1–8	0.01	33%	22 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.10	30%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.04	25%	20 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	26%	20 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.05	29%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	21%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	37%	19 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	31%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	17%	14 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	31%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.09	22%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.00	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	16%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	21%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.04	21%	13 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.02	29%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	38%	3 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	32%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.11	21%	31 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.03	18%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.05	20%	31 Jul →
mirage	1–7	0.03	31%	31 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	24%	30 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.09	20%	30 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	11%	30 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	8%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	23%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.02	18%	25 Jul →
overpass	13–9	-0.06	27%	22 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.02	14%	21 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.03	16%	18 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.00	16%	18 Jul →
anubis	16–12	-0.09	10%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	16%	18 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	33%	17 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	26%	16 Jul →
shelter	7–13	-0.06	46%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	25%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	30%	16 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	19%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–1	-0.04	29%	15 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	16%	9 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	19%	9 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.03	24%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.00	16%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.05	16%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	23%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	16%	2 Jul →
cache	13–16	0.06	18%	1 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.00	24%	29 Jun →
overpass	13–8	-0.02	20%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–16	-0.05	21%	27 Jun →
inferno	8–13	0.03	18%	27 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.02	31%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.01	15%	24 Jun →
inferno	1–13	-0.05	19%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	14%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.06	26%	23 Jun →