Robenzio — CS2 Stats

76561198102884349[U:1:142618621]

2,150Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,937Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7244 of 23023 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,611 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRobenzioFACEITLevel 8 · 1,611 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,937 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning43
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42544Last 10042%Win rateWWWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression5.7
Utility5.3
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.3
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time544ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — train 13–16
131Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 15% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB24121250%-0.01
nukeB1910953%0.01
mirageD1321115%-0.02
dust2A127558%-0.00
anubisC104640%-0.02
infernoC73443%-0.02
cacheB63350%-0.02
overpassD51420%0.01
train4040%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,790Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
76.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12959%0.9715.3
Anubis9246%0.9715.5
Nuke8448%0.9214.9
Overpass3954%1.0317.1
Train3352%1.0515.6
Mirage2934%0.7513.2
Inferno2941%0.8413.5
Vertigo2839%0.8414.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
543msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
52.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
8.94HE damage / grenade
8.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3217% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–100.0120%28 Aug
cache13–100.0426%28 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0018%28 Aug
nuke13–80.0810%23 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0619%23 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0419%21 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0345%21 Aug
anubis6–13-0.008%21 Aug
cache13–70.0318%21 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0312%21 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0510%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0333%21 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0919%21 Aug
nuke13–20.039%21 Aug
anubis13–90.0311%21 Aug
nuke13–3-0.048%20 Aug
ancient13–80.0419%20 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0510%20 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0420%20 Aug
dust213–80.0532%2 Aug
dust25–0-0.030%18 Jul
anubis4–13-0.080%18 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0323%18 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0112%16 Jul
ancient13–70.0125%16 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0115%15 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0513%15 Jul
nuke13–60.0312%14 Jul
ancient13–100.028%14 Jul
cache13–7-0.0218%14 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0117%14 Jul
ancient5–130.0518%12 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0014%12 Jul
mirage0–6-0.078%12 Jul
nuke13–100.0112%12 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0415%11 Jul
nuke13–110.0310%11 Jul
mirage0–6-0.090%11 Jul
anubis9–2-0.1014%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0212%11 Jul
nuke13–40.0718%11 Jul
dust29–2-0.0112%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.0211%11 Jul
cache10–13-0.0520%10 Jul
dust213–10-0.0028%10 Jul
anubis5–70.088%21 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0911%1 Jun
mirage8–130.0725%1 Jun
nuke13–90.0211%1 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0214%31 May
inferno13–11-0.0317%31 May
cache9–13-0.009%31 May
cache4–13-0.093%23 May
dust213–11-0.0711%14 Feb
overpass17–190.0315%12 Feb
ancient13–110.0415%12 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0533%12 Feb
nuke16–140.0919%11 Feb
ancient13–60.0117%9 Feb
dust213–70.066%5 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0018%5 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0917%5 Feb
ancient13–90.0516%2 Jan
nuke12–16-0.026%31 Dec
ancient13–40.0123%31 Dec
dust210–13-0.0212%31 Dec
ancient13–110.0216%31 Dec
ancient6–13-0.0313%7 Nov
overpass5–13-0.0413%5 Nov
ancient13–9-0.0414%2 Nov
train9–13-0.028%1 Nov
overpass11–130.0824%30 Oct
train11–13-0.1213%29 Oct
nuke11–13-0.0212%17 Oct
ancient7–13-0.0322%10 Oct
inferno9–130.0116%2 Oct
nuke7–13-0.0510%2 Oct
ancient8–13-0.0916%3 Sept
overpass5–13-0.029%1 Sept
ancient5–130.0517%30 Aug
nuke9–130.0129%29 Aug
train13–160.1132%29 Aug
ancient6–13-0.029%23 Aug
dust28–13-0.0310%23 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0721%23 Aug
nuke7–130.0025%23 Aug
anubis12–12-0.074%22 Aug
anubis12–120.0014%22 Aug
mirage8–130.0424%3 Aug
nuke13–30.1013%3 Aug
overpass16–140.019%3 Aug
dust213–3-0.0221%21 Jul
inferno13–10.010%24 Jun
dust212–120.1021%24 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0120%24 Jun
inferno13–20.0520%14 Jun
train9–13-0.0310%14 Jun
ancient7–130.0118%8 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0317%6 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0216%6 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →