✪ Shari

✪ Shari — CS2 Stats

AT76561198101585915[U:1:141320187]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

47Tracked matches34%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,170Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,951 +7,952 26 Nov – 7 Dec · 8 days played
4,89812,951peak 12,95126 Nov7 Dec
12,951Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2023-04-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning33
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD14–20–4Last 3837%Win rateLWTTWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +76ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 711ms

Last 10

  • 3–5–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 745ms

Last 20

  • 8–9–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 707ms

Newest first, from the last 38 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility3.5
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 33% on CT to 10% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 687ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning3.3
Utility3.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time729ms+44ms
first ⅓ avg 686ms → last ⅓ avg 729ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 38 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 6 Sept →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · ancient, 6 Mar →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 4 Dec →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 10 Jan →

Across the last 38 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 43% over 14dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC146–843%-0.02
dust2D71–614%-0.04
mirageD62–433%-0.05
nuke—33–0100%0.04
vertigo—31–233%-0.01
ancient—20–20%-0.08
anubis—21–150%-0.03
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 38 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,716Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,233Matches
42.5%Match win rate
45.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
5,757MVPs
1,037Hours (in match)
3,011Bombs planted
474Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

14,661dust2
4,339inferno
454nuke
113cbble
110vertigo
49train
20dust
11stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
687msReaction time
10.4%T opening success
32.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
9.92HE damage / grenade
6.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 10.4409% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0635%6 Oct →
nuke9–50.0815%1 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0626%1 Oct →
inferno8–80.0118%30 Sept →
nuke9–40.0725%17 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0645%12 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.1125%12 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0313%6 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0810%6 Sept →
inferno9–50.1027%6 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0433%6 Sept →
nuke9–6-0.0326%6 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0529%5 Sept →
dust213–70.0124%5 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0125%5 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0030%31 Jul →
dust27–13-0.088%10 Jan →
inferno13–2-0.0420%10 Jan →
mirage2–10-0.1133%13 Dec →
dust25–13-0.0817%1 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0629%8 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0823%8 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0442%6 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0854%6 Mar →
mirage15–15-0.0322%6 Mar →
vertigo13–6-0.0039%7 Dec →
inferno13–70.0017%7 Dec →
inferno13–40.040%4 Dec →
inferno13–11-0.0319%4 Dec →
anubis10–13-0.0118%3 Dec →
inferno4–13-0.0235%2 Dec →
vertigo9–13-0.0317%2 Dec →
inferno12–160.0118%30 Nov →
overpass7–13-0.0236%29 Nov →
anubis13–8-0.0411%29 Nov →
vertigo11–13-0.0131%27 Nov →
mirage13–90.0632%26 Nov →
dust23–9-0.0643%21 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.