Mo'lit

Mo'lit — CS2 Stats

FR76561198100162477[U:1:139896749]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

492Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
389Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#58105 of 260007 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,351 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,871 +10,657 13 Jan – 10 May · 11 days played
11,21422,098peak 22,09813 Jan10 May
22,098Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,351Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2025-01-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,351
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 180 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate46.1%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy5.2%12.4%12.7%7.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.031.050.17 short
Match win rate49.0%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMo'litFACEITLevel 6 · 1,351 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,351csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning42
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWLLWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −120ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.7
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.2
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time662ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy25.3%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 14 Feb →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 14 Feb →
422msFastest reaction time · 9–5 · vertigo, 14 Feb →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 9 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 18anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2314–961%0.02
dust2C207–1335%-0.03
nukeS1814–478%0.01
anubisD134–931%-0.01
mirageA85–363%0.00
ancientB63–350%-0.01
vertigoS64–267%-0.01
poseidon—21–150%0.00
cache—11–0100%-0.05
overpass—11–0100%0.07
rooftop—10–10%-0.09
whistle—10–10%-0.27

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,122Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
940Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
46.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
5.2%Shot accuracy
2,141MVPs
389Hours (in match)
1,127Bombs planted
170Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,888inferno
1,520dust2
1,190nuke
690vertigo
265train
85lake
45cbble
39office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

176Matches
51%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
69.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24448%0.8112.3
Inferno3262%0.9613.8
Nuke2959%0.9613.7
Anubis2744%0.9415.5
Mirage2450%0.9313.0
Ancient1644%0.8113.0
Train10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
28.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.8%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
606msReaction time
23.2%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
16.6%Flash assists
9.70HE damage / grenade
6.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.1606% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–40.0724%18 Jul →
inferno8–130.0015%10 May →
ancient4–13-0.0523%10 May →
cache13–10-0.0511%9 May →
nuke13–8-0.0030%9 May →
mirage13–10-0.0325%9 May →
mirage13–00.0928%9 May →
dust210–13-0.0444%7 Apr →
dust213–3-0.0826%4 Apr →
dust213–30.0011%4 Mar →
inferno13–11-0.0619%4 Mar →
inferno9–60.0119%3 Mar →
overpass9–40.0743%3 Mar →
nuke9–50.0826%3 Mar →
poseidon8–8-0.0025%3 Mar →
anubis20–220.0323%24 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0129%23 Feb →
dust214–16-0.0427%22 Feb →
dust21–13-0.1031%22 Feb →
dust216–13-0.0520%15 Feb →
inferno13–40.0113%15 Feb →
dust213–110.0322%15 Feb →
anubis13–80.0238%15 Feb →
ancient4–13-0.0423%15 Feb →
nuke13–6-0.0225%14 Feb →
inferno13–80.0220%14 Feb →
inferno9–00.2145%14 Feb →
nuke9–20.1214%14 Feb →
inferno9–50.0732%14 Feb →
vertigo9–50.0331%14 Feb →
poseidon9–50.0141%14 Feb →
dust216–14-0.0216%14 Feb →
inferno9–10.1014%10 Feb →
nuke9–1-0.0026%10 Feb →
inferno7–9-0.0411%10 Feb →
inferno13–160.0015%10 Dec →
inferno9–20.0314%8 Dec →
rooftop2–9-0.0913%8 Dec →
inferno8–80.0726%8 Dec →
vertigo3–9-0.0529%8 Dec →
inferno9–00.004%4 Dec →
inferno7–13-0.0518%17 May →
nuke13–9-0.0323%17 May →
inferno16–19-0.0328%10 May →
dust24–13-0.0327%2 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0419%2 Mar →
anubis10–130.0121%26 Feb →
nuke13–50.0011%23 Feb →
anubis9–13-0.0215%23 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.046%22 Feb →
dust211–13-0.059%22 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0611%20 Feb →
dust22–13-0.0811%17 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0626%11 Feb →
nuke16–14-0.0429%10 Feb →
mirage9–130.0125%9 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0120%7 Feb →
nuke16–12-0.0420%7 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0419%6 Feb →
nuke6–130.0316%4 Feb →
anubis13–9-0.0111%2 Feb →
dust213–11-0.0024%28 Jan →
dust210–13-0.068%27 Jan →
ancient13–8-0.0029%24 Jan →
anubis13–50.0922%23 Jan →
whistle7–9-0.2715%23 Jan →
nuke9–40.0425%23 Jan →
inferno9–30.0413%23 Jan →
nuke13–4-0.0117%20 Jan →
inferno13–70.0230%20 Jan →
anubis9–13-0.0418%20 Jan →
ancient13–9-0.0119%19 Jan →
mirage13–6-0.0118%19 Jan →
dust210–130.0112%19 Jan →
inferno10–130.0111%18 Jan →
anubis6–130.0016%18 Jan →
vertigo13–9-0.0414%18 Jan →
nuke10–13-0.0236%18 Jan →
ancient13–110.008%18 Jan →
dust24–13-0.0417%18 Jan →
nuke10–130.0032%17 Jan →
vertigo16–120.018%17 Jan →
mirage13–60.0320%17 Jan →
dust29–130.0034%17 Jan →
mirage4–13-0.0627%17 Jan →
anubis14–16-0.0319%17 Jan →
dust211–13-0.0021%17 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0710%17 Jan →
inferno16–13-0.0122%17 Jan →
ancient10–130.0131%16 Jan →
dust213–50.0225%16 Jan →
nuke13–60.0221%16 Jan →
dust29–13-0.0219%15 Jan →
vertigo13–70.0538%15 Jan →
anubis15–15-0.0311%15 Jan →
vertigo10–13-0.0827%15 Jan →
nuke13–60.0325%15 Jan →
mirage13–60.0218%15 Jan →
inferno13–90.0434%15 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0616%13 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.