malba

malba — CS2 Stats

HR76561198098100171[U:1:137834443]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,160Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
10,766Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,533Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15033 of 220522 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,160 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 18 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,533 -1,913 18 Jan9 Sept · 40 days played
22,35027,446peak 27,44618 Jan9 Sept
27,672Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2026-01-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,913 below peak (27,446)
  • -559 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,467 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.9%48.3%51.0%meets
Shot accuracy16.8%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.871.071.090.21 short
Match win rate47.3%46.9%48.4%1.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmalbaFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,533 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning57
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.7
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time566ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 14 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–5 · inferno, 6 May
391msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · inferno, 2 Apr
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 14 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 22infernoWeakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29141548%0.00
dust2A2213959%-0.00
infernoC2191243%-0.00
ancientB1910953%0.01
anubisB63350%0.00
nuke2020%-0.04
overpass1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

160,634Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
5,901Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
50.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
14,622MVPs
10,766Hours (in match)
9,839Bombs planted
2,015Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4764,921
AWP21,926
FAMAS4,427
MP91,532
Knife1,297

Lifetime map wins

14,875dust2
10,109inferno
1,447vertigo
1,251train
609nuke
517cbble
56safehouse
46assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,227Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
73.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18949%0.9914.5
Ancient8554%1.0615.2
Dust28452%1.0415.1
Anubis7654%0.9814.6
Inferno6148%0.9513.5
Vertigo1644%1.1114.6
Overpass1560%1.1315.7
Cache475%0.8915.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
572msReaction time
30.5%T opening success
50.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
7.96HE damage / grenade
15.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.4647% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–16-0.0321%20 Jun
mirage13–90.0419%20 Jun
mirage11–130.0013%15 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0322%15 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0128%10 Jun
dust213–11-0.0123%10 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0214%3 Jun
dust213–30.0021%3 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0016%1 Jun
anubis13–40.1024%30 May
ancient13–110.0232%30 May
inferno16–14-0.044%27 May
mirage7–130.0317%26 May
dust215–150.0618%25 May
inferno13–60.0417%25 May
mirage5–13-0.1021%24 May
ancient13–30.0411%24 May
mirage13–110.0235%24 May
anubis10–130.0314%22 May
mirage13–110.0519%18 May
dust29–13-0.0512%18 May
dust213–16-0.0116%17 May
mirage13–70.056%17 May
mirage9–13-0.019%16 May
dust213–30.0320%16 May
mirage13–11-0.048%13 May
dust213–5-0.0018%13 May
nuke10–13-0.0614%11 May
mirage15–150.0324%10 May
inferno6–130.0121%10 May
ancient13–5-0.0118%10 May
dust23–13-0.0129%10 May
dust22–13-0.025%7 May
inferno13–9-0.0716%7 May
ancient9–13-0.0119%6 May
mirage11–130.0317%6 May
inferno0–5-0.0850%6 May
ancient13–9-0.0718%6 May
mirage13–110.0622%5 May
dust216–12-0.0336%5 May
inferno13–80.0514%3 May
dust211–13-0.0214%3 May
ancient13–100.0126%3 May
dust216–14-0.0016%3 May
mirage13–9-0.0214%3 May
mirage13–30.046%3 May
overpass10–130.0330%3 May
dust213–11-0.0216%2 May
mirage13–8-0.0116%2 May
ancient13–70.0218%29 Apr
inferno11–130.0318%29 Apr
mirage11–130.0118%29 Apr
inferno13–100.0126%29 Apr
ancient10–130.0413%27 Apr
dust215–150.0016%27 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0319%26 Apr
ancient9–130.0518%26 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0318%25 Apr
dust213–100.0629%25 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0310%25 Apr
dust213–30.1015%21 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0120%21 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0111%21 Apr
inferno14–160.0717%20 Apr
mirage4–130.0032%19 Apr
anubis2–13-0.1031%19 Apr
dust213–40.0315%14 Apr
ancient13–10.1414%14 Apr
anubis8–130.0419%9 Apr
dust213–40.0414%9 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0219%9 Apr
mirage1–13-0.076%7 Apr
inferno14–16-0.0515%4 Apr
inferno16–14-0.057%3 Apr
dust22–13-0.0612%3 Apr
inferno13–80.0524%2 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0211%2 Apr
mirage13–60.0417%2 Apr
dust213–7-0.0030%4 Feb
inferno8–130.0313%4 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0314%3 Feb
dust20–13-0.1021%2 Feb
inferno11–130.0323%2 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0220%31 Jan
anubis13–100.0111%31 Jan
mirage13–60.0321%31 Jan
inferno13–30.048%30 Jan
mirage13–110.0426%30 Jan
mirage13–3-0.0420%29 Jan
ancient10–13-0.0314%28 Jan
ancient13–80.0213%28 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0112%26 Jan
mirage8–130.0337%25 Jan
anubis13–9-0.065%24 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0316%23 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0721%22 Jan
dust213–10-0.0510%22 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0636%18 Jan
ancient13–30.0628%18 Jan
mirage9–130.0118%18 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →