the other woman — CS2 Stats

TV76561198097908646[U:1:137642918]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

974Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,275Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating14,180Blue band · top ~32.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#157162 of 259985 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (62 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 14,180 → 14,180

+69Tracked matches · now 974

−25.9ppWin rate · 66.7% → 40.7%

Rating over time

14,180Peak Premier on CSDB

54Days played since 2026-07-06

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 14,180
Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 820 to go
Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
Blue band first seen 2026-09-04
Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Blue band median	Purple band median	vs Purple band
Headshot rate	30.2%	42.0%	44.4%	14.2% short
Shot accuracy	10.0%	9.6%	11.9%	1.8% short
Kill/death ratio	0.80	0.98	1.03	0.23 short
Match win rate	42.6%	43.8%	45.2%	2.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Purple band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53

Positioning59

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–40–10Last 10050%Win rateWWWLWWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 8%
Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

6–3–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 7%
Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

8–10–2 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 6%
Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.3

Utility6.0

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels2.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3

Positioning5.9

Utility6.0

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact1.9

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time543ms−104ms

first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms

Headshot accuracy7.0%−0.0%

first ⅓ avg 7.1% → last ⅓ avg 7.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–6 · vertigo, 7 Oct →

17%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · vertigo, 22 Oct →

391msFastest reaction time · 8–5 · vertigo, 12 Sept →

12–0Biggest win · vertigo, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Lifetime stats

31,150Lifetime kills

0.80K/D

2,106Matches

42.6%Match win rate

30.2%Headshot %

10.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band

2,690MVPs

722Hours (in match)

3,176Bombs planted

333Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-476,185

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,740

P902,784

AUG2,302

XM10141,506

Negev1,376

P2000 / USP-S1,170

PP-Bizon1,132

AWP1,018

SG 553898

Lifetime map wins

10,398vertigo

1,468inferno

1,273dust2

612nuke

376train

152cbble

145safehouse

112lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

7.0%Headshot accuracy

28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.7%Spray accuracy

80.0%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

542msReaction time

36.5%T opening success

44.8%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

6.5%Flash assists

14.09HE damage / grenade

8.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 7.0381% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.476% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	13–8	-0.05	6%	4 Nov →
vertigo	13–8	-0.03	13%	4 Nov →
vertigo	13–7	0.04	9%	2 Nov →
vertigo	11–13	-0.05	9%	1 Nov →
vertigo	13–11	-0.01	5%	31 Oct →
vertigo	13–10	-0.02	2%	31 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	-0.10	8%	26 Oct →
vertigo	9–13	-0.07	7%	24 Oct →
vertigo	12–12	0.02	13%	24 Oct →
vertigo	6–13	-0.13	3%	22 Oct →
vertigo	11–13	-0.07	17%	22 Oct →
vertigo	13–9	0.01	6%	18 Oct →
vertigo	12–12	-0.04	2%	18 Oct →
vertigo	11–13	0.02	2%	18 Oct →
vertigo	13–7	-0.04	9%	18 Oct →
vertigo	11–13	-0.06	7%	17 Oct →
vertigo	5–13	-0.09	0%	15 Oct →
vertigo	1–13	-0.10	3%	15 Oct →
vertigo	2–13	-0.07	0%	15 Oct →
vertigo	8–13	-0.08	9%	14 Oct →
vertigo	12–12	-0.05	8%	14 Oct →
vertigo	13–9	0.03	8%	12 Oct →
vertigo	9–13	-0.04	9%	10 Oct →
vertigo	8–13	-0.03	2%	9 Oct →
vertigo	11–13	-0.07	8%	9 Oct →
vertigo	10–13	-0.01	9%	8 Oct →
vertigo	9–13	-0.01	8%	8 Oct →
vertigo	13–6	0.10	7%	7 Oct →
vertigo	13–9	-0.02	11%	7 Oct →
vertigo	7–13	-0.04	6%	5 Oct →
vertigo	13–8	0.00	13%	5 Oct →
vertigo	10–13	-0.02	5%	4 Oct →
vertigo	13–8	-0.05	10%	4 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	-0.05	3%	3 Oct →
vertigo	12–0	-0.01	5%	3 Oct →
vertigo	13–4	0.03	8%	3 Oct →
vertigo	12–12	-0.04	4%	3 Oct →
vertigo	10–13	-0.07	4%	3 Oct →
vertigo	6–13	-0.10	15%	2 Oct →
vertigo	12–12	-0.07	13%	1 Oct →
vertigo	13–3	-0.00	13%	1 Oct →
vertigo	6–13	-0.09	4%	30 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	-0.05	7%	30 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	-0.03	10%	27 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	-0.03	10%	26 Sept →
vertigo	2–13	-0.09	0%	26 Sept →
vertigo	13–10	0.03	9%	25 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	-0.02	13%	24 Sept →
vertigo	9–2	0.03	16%	24 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	0.02	11%	24 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	-0.08	10%	24 Sept →
vertigo	9–13	-0.02	10%	21 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	-0.09	3%	20 Sept →
vertigo	13–7	-0.07	11%	20 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	9%	15 Sept →
vertigo	13–7	-0.05	10%	15 Sept →
vertigo	13–10	-0.02	6%	14 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	0.02	4%	14 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	-0.06	6%	14 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	-0.11	6%	13 Sept →
vertigo	8–5	0.07	17%	12 Sept →
vertigo	2–13	-0.03	12%	12 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	0.03	2%	12 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	-0.01	10%	12 Sept →
vertigo	9–13	-0.00	13%	10 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	-0.08	5%	9 Sept →
vertigo	13–10	-0.06	6%	9 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	-0.01	6%	7 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	0.00	10%	7 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	-0.04	9%	2 Sept →
vertigo	13–7	0.03	10%	30 Aug →
vertigo	7–2	0.04	5%	30 Aug →
vertigo	3–13	-0.06	0%	27 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	-0.07	8%	19 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	-0.04	0%	19 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	-0.07	5%	17 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	-0.03	9%	17 Aug →
vertigo	2–13	-0.06	6%	13 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	-0.10	0%	13 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.06	4%	12 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.04	5%	9 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	-0.02	10%	9 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	-0.05	17%	9 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.09	5%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	-0.03	8%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.07	10%	6 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	-0.04	11%	5 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	-0.03	0%	4 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	-0.09	4%	4 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.04	12%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	-0.02	9%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	-0.01	2%	1 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	12%	1 Aug →
vertigo	13–4	-0.02	8%	29 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	-0.02	11%	12 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	0.03	12%	12 Jul →
vertigo	4–13	-0.13	12%	10 Jul →
vertigo	6–13	-0.09	0%	7 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.03	5%	6 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	-0.08	11%	6 Jul →