✪ TRM

✪ TRM — CS2 Stats

CH76561198097274688[U:1:137008960]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,403Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,913Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,428Top 25% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28587 of 259124 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,428 +2,377 18 Jul – 31 Oct · 21 days played
22,05124,428peak 24,42818 Jul31 Oct
24,428Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,039Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-07-18

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,428
  • +1,181 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,267 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 572 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate51.6%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy12.4%13.2%13.7%1.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.090.08 short
Match win rate37.7%46.9%48.4%10.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ TRMFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,428 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,039csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning44
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateWWLLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility7.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.4
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time519ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 17 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · mirage, 12 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 0–9 · inferno, 3 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 20dust2Weakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2714–1352%0.01
cacheS2014–670%-0.00
anubisB179–853%0.03
nukeS96–367%0.01
ancientA74–357%0.01
mirageS64–267%0.00
dust2C52–340%0.01
vertigo—42–250%0.05
boulder—21–150%-0.05
office—20–20%0.06
fachwerk—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

110,740Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
4,254Matches
37.7%Match win rate
51.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
12.4%Shot accuracy
8,765MVPs
2,475Hours (in match)
6,983Bombs planted
1,120Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4748,668
AWP8,085
P2502,279
P901,953
FAMAS1,930

Lifetime map wins

5,247inferno
4,627dust2
1,633nuke
1,177cbble
1,004vertigo
750train
273dust
268office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

381Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
71.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8265%1.1215.2
Mirage7539%0.9313.5
Anubis6954%1.0315.0
Dust23644%0.9713.8
Vertigo2277%1.1314.4
Nuke2050%0.9314.9
Train1164%1.0913.6
Overpass1060%0.9715.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
524msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
5.54HE damage / grenade
16.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.1008% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0118%31 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.009%31 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0528%31 Oct →
boulder10–130.0221%25 Oct →
cache13–90.0529%25 Oct →
anubis13–110.0216%25 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0023%25 Oct →
inferno13–70.0823%24 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0111%24 Oct →
cache13–6-0.078%23 Oct →
cache13–60.0129%23 Oct →
cache13–110.0413%21 Oct →
nuke13–100.0315%21 Oct →
anubis13–50.0312%21 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0326%21 Oct →
nuke13–80.0618%18 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0326%18 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0216%16 Oct →
nuke13–50.0122%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0114%14 Oct →
ancient13–50.0313%14 Oct →
anubis13–90.0219%14 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0323%8 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0110%8 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0223%8 Oct →
inferno13–90.019%8 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0019%3 Oct →
inferno9–40.1518%3 Oct →
anubis7–130.0616%3 Oct →
inferno0–9-0.280%3 Oct →
cache13–40.0321%3 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0025%2 Oct →
inferno8–130.0114%1 Oct →
anubis16–13-0.0313%1 Oct →
anubis7–5-0.0315%1 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0123%1 Oct →
inferno9–50.0437%1 Oct →
inferno9–3-0.0510%1 Oct →
inferno7–130.0011%1 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0117%1 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0517%1 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0112%1 Oct →
office3–130.0417%25 Sept →
nuke9–130.0319%25 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0111%23 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0414%23 Sept →
vertigo13–100.1010%23 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.039%20 Sept →
anubis13–70.0811%20 Sept →
vertigo5–130.0610%19 Sept →
cache5–130.0412%19 Sept →
anubis13–10.1317%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.069%19 Sept →
inferno9–40.1835%18 Sept →
mirage13–20.0438%18 Sept →
inferno9–30.0945%18 Sept →
inferno9–20.3424%17 Sept →
dust213–70.1420%17 Sept →
anubis11–130.0816%17 Sept →
anubis7–130.0212%17 Sept →
ancient13–80.0316%13 Sept →
inferno13–20.0415%13 Sept →
inferno13–90.0422%12 Sept →
mirage13–00.0050%12 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0114%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0421%12 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0411%12 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.0633%11 Sept →
ancient13–00.0715%11 Sept →
dust213–110.0216%11 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.032%11 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0116%11 Sept →
fachwerk5–13-0.0111%6 Sept →
office8–130.0819%6 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0221%6 Sept →
boulder13–8-0.1211%26 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0513%28 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0614%26 Jul →
anubis8–130.0511%26 Jul →
inferno13–90.0121%26 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0210%24 Jul →
vertigo8–13-0.008%24 Jul →
cache13–80.0023%24 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.049%23 Jul →
anubis13–50.1012%23 Jul →
cache13–40.019%22 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0419%22 Jul →
cache7–130.019%22 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0415%20 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0115%20 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.027%20 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0417%20 Jul →
mirage13–80.0310%18 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0020%18 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0414%18 Jul →
ancient12–160.029%18 Jul →
cache13–90.0211%18 Jul →
inferno13–30.037%18 Jul →
mirage13–70.0123%18 Jul →
inferno13–80.0116%18 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.