Telen😳 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198095493809[U:1:135228081]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,100Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,148Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.6 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating24,726Top 25% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#25844 of 259615 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,362 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,726 -1,066 24 May – 1 Nov · 25 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,362 +0 1 Sept – 15 Sept · 5 observations

26,965Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,362Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

50Days played since 2026-05-24

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,362
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 138 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

2,117 below peak (26,843)
-135 over 30 days · steady
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 274 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	42.6%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	16.5%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.34	1.09
Match win rate	54.6%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning79

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateLWLWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.9pp headshot accuracy · +47ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.09
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

10–10 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim9.5

Utility5.2

Positioning7.9

Opening Duels7.1

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 77% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 77% on CT to 45% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning7.9

Utility5.2

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels6.9

Win Impact3.9

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time525ms−27ms

first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms

Headshot accuracy24.1%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 26 May →

47%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · ancient, 30 May →

359msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · anubis, 30 May →

13–1Biggest win · nuke, 1 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 50% over 22dust2Weakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	33	15–18	45%	0.02
ancient	B	22	11–11	50%	0.04
dust2	D	12	4–8	33%	0.00
cache	C	12	5–7	42%	0.05
nuke	B	10	5–5	50%	0.03
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	0.05
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.01
inferno	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

121,577Lifetime kills

1.34K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players

5,439Matches

54.6%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 10 players

42.6%Headshot %

16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 10 players

15,398MVPs

2,113Hours (in match)

7,151Bombs planted

1,740Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,599

AWP20,524

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,674

Desert Eagle11,470

P2000 / USP-S6,371

Glock-184,428

Galil AR4,141

P2502,741

Five-SeveN2,739

SG 5532,526

Lifetime map wins

11,083dust2

3,106inferno

2,299cbble

1,437nuke

682italy

680office

578assault

568train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

893Matches

56%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

111.7ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	74	46%	1.42	20.9
Ancient	66	61%	1.67	21.6
Anubis	25	68%	1.55	21.2
Overpass	15	73%	1.27	18.1
Nuke	9	78%	1.55	17.8
Cache	8	50%	1.60	22.8
Dust2	2	100%	2.40	24.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.20	3.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy

42.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.4%Spray accuracy

84.3%Counter-strafing

7.6°Preaim

520msReaction time

44.8%T opening success

76.9%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

6.1%Flash assists

10.57HE damage / grenade

6.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	11–13	0.12	17%	1 Nov →
inferno	13–11	0.06	18%	1 Nov →
mirage	14–16	0.09	21%	20 Oct →
mirage	16–13	0.07	26%	20 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.11	24%	15 Oct →
nuke	13–16	0.04	30%	11 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.02	15%	11 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.05	27%	7 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.01	26%	7 Oct →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	15%	1 Oct →
mirage	16–12	-0.04	31%	1 Oct →
anubis	7–13	0.02	30%	28 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.05	15%	24 Sept →
cache	6–13	0.01	22%	24 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.08	37%	15 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.03	37%	14 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.06	28%	14 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.10	25%	14 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.00	17%	31 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.05	27%	31 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	31%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	15%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	23%	27 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	27%	27 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	37%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.10	28%	22 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	22%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.12	22%	18 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.09	25%	6 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	20%	6 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.03	26%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.09	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	16%	28 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	24%	27 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.00	17%	27 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.02	18%	26 Jul →
overpass	13–5	0.00	21%	26 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.04	19%	25 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.02	23%	21 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.07	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.12	14%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.00	19%	19 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.08	19%	17 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	23%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	13%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	24%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.05	16%	11 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	31%	10 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	15%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.08	21%	5 Jul →
ancient	12–16	-0.03	23%	4 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.01	11%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.18	29%	2 Jul →
nuke	9–5	0.17	35%	29 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.01	27%	27 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.04	21%	27 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.00	26%	25 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	20%	24 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.00	29%	24 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	11%	23 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.01	20%	23 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	23%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.02	21%	14 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	23%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.08	18%	14 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	23%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.02	26%	10 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.03	35%	9 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.09	43%	6 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.01	16%	6 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	7%	4 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	40%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.11	25%	4 Jun →
overpass	5–13	0.02	28%	4 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.01	22%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.01	14%	3 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	21%	3 Jun →
dust2	4–13	0.01	25%	3 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.05	27%	2 Jun →
nuke	13–1	0.03	19%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	24%	1 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.02	25%	31 May →
ancient	16–12	-0.01	21%	31 May →
mirage	11–3	0.06	37%	31 May →
mirage	0–2	-0.12	0%	31 May →
mirage	13–5	0.05	42%	30 May →
dust2	16–13	-0.00	24%	30 May →
ancient	6–13	0.05	47%	30 May →
nuke	13–5	0.10	42%	30 May →
anubis	1–13	0.08	10%	30 May →
dust2	13–11	0.05	41%	30 May →
overpass	13–10	-0.05	23%	30 May →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	18%	30 May →
mirage	6–13	0.01	16%	28 May →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	23%	28 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	10%	27 May →
nuke	6–13	0.02	7%	26 May →
mirage	13–7	0.18	31%	26 May →
mirage	10–13	0.02	16%	26 May →
anubis	10–13	0.05	34%	24 May →