Telen😳 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198095493809[U:1:135228081]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,083Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,136Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating23,850Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#32519 of 251264 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,362 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−680Premier CS Rating · 24,530 → 23,850

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,850 -2,229 19 May – 11 Oct · 25 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,362 +0 1 Sept – 15 Sept · 5 observations

26,965Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,362Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

50Days played since 2026-05-19

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,362
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 138 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

2,993 below peak (26,843)
+965 over 30 days · improving
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,150 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	38	—	—
Win rate	53%	—	—
K/D	1.41	—	—
Headshot %	53%	—	—

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,304), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	42.6%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	16.6%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.34	1.09
Match win rate	54.6%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning74

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateLLLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · +59ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

9–11 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim9.5

Utility4.9

Positioning7.4

Opening Duels6.2

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 74% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 74% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning7.4

Utility4.9

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels6.2

Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time540ms−12ms

first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms

Headshot accuracy23.9%+0.2%

first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 26 May →

47%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · ancient, 30 May →

359msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · anubis, 30 May →

13–1Biggest win · nuke, 1 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

L4Current streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 50% over 20dust2Weakest map · 33% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	32	15–17	47%	0.02
ancient	B	20	10–10	50%	0.03
dust2	D	15	5–10	33%	0.00
cache	B	13	6–7	46%	0.04
nuke	B	10	5–5	50%	0.03
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	0.05
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.01
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

121,070Lifetime kills

1.34K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players

5,423Matches

54.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players

42.6%Headshot %

16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 10 players

15,314MVPs

2,105Hours (in match)

7,121Bombs planted

1,730Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,380

AWP20,475

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,580

Desert Eagle11,431

P2000 / USP-S6,343

Glock-184,403

Galil AR4,138

P2502,738

Five-SeveN2,732

SG 5532,526

Lifetime map wins

11,083dust2

3,093inferno

2,299cbble

1,424nuke

682italy

680office

578assault

568train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

881Matches

56%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

111.0ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	71	45%	1.37	20.7
Ancient	60	58%	1.56	20.9
Anubis	23	70%	1.53	20.7
Overpass	15	73%	1.27	18.1
Cache	8	50%	1.60	22.8
Nuke	8	75%	1.47	17.3
Dust2	2	100%	2.40	24.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.20	3.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy

42.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.0%Spray accuracy

85.1%Counter-strafing

7.2°Preaim

532msReaction time

39.5%T opening success

74.1%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

4.2%Flash assists

9.06HE damage / grenade

5.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.5078% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–16	0.04	30%	11 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.02	15%	11 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.05	27%	7 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.01	26%	7 Oct →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	15%	1 Oct →
mirage	16–12	-0.04	31%	1 Oct →
anubis	7–13	0.02	30%	28 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.05	15%	24 Sept →
cache	6–13	0.01	22%	24 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.08	37%	15 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.03	37%	14 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.06	28%	14 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.10	25%	14 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.00	17%	31 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.05	27%	31 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	31%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	15%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	23%	27 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	27%	27 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	37%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.10	28%	22 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	22%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.12	22%	18 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.09	25%	6 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	20%	6 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.03	26%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.09	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	16%	28 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	24%	27 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.00	17%	27 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.02	18%	26 Jul →
overpass	13–5	0.00	21%	26 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.04	19%	25 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.02	23%	21 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.07	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.12	14%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.00	19%	19 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.08	19%	17 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	23%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	13%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	24%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.05	16%	11 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	31%	10 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	15%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.08	21%	5 Jul →
ancient	12–16	-0.03	23%	4 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.01	11%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.18	29%	2 Jul →
nuke	9–5	0.17	35%	29 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.01	27%	27 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.04	21%	27 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.00	26%	25 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	20%	24 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.00	29%	24 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	11%	23 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.01	20%	23 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	23%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.02	21%	14 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	23%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.08	18%	14 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	23%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.02	26%	10 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.03	35%	9 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.09	43%	6 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.01	16%	6 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	7%	4 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	40%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.11	25%	4 Jun →
overpass	5–13	0.02	28%	4 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.01	22%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.01	14%	3 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	21%	3 Jun →
dust2	4–13	0.01	25%	3 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.05	27%	2 Jun →
nuke	13–1	0.03	19%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	24%	1 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.02	25%	31 May →
ancient	16–12	-0.01	21%	31 May →
mirage	11–3	0.06	37%	31 May →
mirage	0–2	-0.12	0%	31 May →
mirage	13–5	0.05	42%	30 May →
dust2	16–13	-0.00	24%	30 May →
ancient	6–13	0.05	47%	30 May →
nuke	13–5	0.10	42%	30 May →
anubis	1–13	0.08	10%	30 May →
dust2	13–11	0.05	41%	30 May →
overpass	13–10	-0.05	23%	30 May →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	18%	30 May →
mirage	6–13	0.01	16%	28 May →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	23%	28 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	10%	27 May →
nuke	6–13	0.02	7%	26 May →
mirage	13–7	0.18	31%	26 May →
mirage	10–13	0.02	16%	26 May →
anubis	10–13	0.05	34%	24 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	21%	21 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	19%	20 May →
mirage	16–14	0.13	25%	20 May →
cache	13–11	0.03	13%	19 May →
dust2	13–10	0.08	33%	19 May →