holvaBiceps

holvaBiceps — CS2 Stats

CA76561198093522984[U:1:133257256]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

698Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,734 +3,625 13 Jan – 5 May · 20 days played
11,10916,220peak 16,22013 Jan5 May
16,422Peak Premier in tracked matches
50Days played since 2026-01-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGholvaBicepsFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning58
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateWLLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −85ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility3.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 676ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.8
Utility3.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time686ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 686ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 8–2 · cache, 4 May →
62%Best headshot accuracy · 3–9 · poseidon, 15 May →
469msFastest reaction time · 6–2 · inferno, 5 Apr →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 5 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2113–862%-0.02
cacheC207–1335%0.00
mirageB179–853%-0.01
nukeS128–467%-0.01
dust2D113–827%-0.01
ancientD61–517%-0.03
overpassS64–267%-0.02
anubis—31–233%-0.04
vertigo—20–20%-0.02
train—11–0100%-0.05
poseidon—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

70Matches
37%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
75.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno540%0.9514.2
Mirage475%1.0010.8
Ancient2100%1.0612.5
Nuke2100%1.3217.5
Dust210%0.508.0
Cache10%0.508.0
Vertigo10%1.1424.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
676msReaction time
49.7%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
1.0%Flash assists
12.12HE damage / grenade
2.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3534 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–40.0325%5 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0520%28 Sept →
ancient12–160.0623%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0214%24 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0822%15 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0114%14 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0828%13 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0523%13 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0430%13 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0216%12 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0128%12 Sept →
cache12–120.0526%6 Jun →
cache6–130.0130%6 Jun →
inferno10–130.0122%29 May →
cache10–13-0.076%28 May →
train13–11-0.0514%28 May →
cache8–13-0.0335%25 May →
cache13–30.0010%25 May →
cache13–7-0.0725%25 May →
cache11–13-0.0611%19 May →
cache7–13-0.0012%15 May →
cache13–110.0319%15 May →
poseidon3–9-0.0662%15 May →
mirage13–20.0318%5 May →
cache9–130.0119%5 May →
cache13–70.1320%5 May →
cache8–20.2115%4 May →
cache2–13-0.1013%4 May →
cache13–60.1116%4 May →
cache3–13-0.120%3 May →
cache13–60.1211%30 Apr →
cache1–13-0.0925%29 Apr →
cache0–13-0.0335%29 Apr →
overpass6–13-0.0610%27 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0510%27 Apr →
inferno12–120.0127%26 Apr →
dust213–90.078%26 Apr →
mirage5–5-0.0421%20 Apr →
dust22–9-0.0612%19 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0518%18 Apr →
inferno13–60.0823%18 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0331%15 Apr →
nuke16–130.0130%14 Apr →
nuke13–80.0023%14 Apr →
mirage13–100.0616%14 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0316%5 Apr →
inferno6–2-0.080%5 Apr →
nuke0–7-0.0612%3 Apr →
inferno13–5-0.0320%3 Apr →
nuke13–30.1017%3 Apr →
overpass13–30.0111%3 Apr →
anubis13–16-0.0415%3 Apr →
inferno13–100.0331%31 Mar →
ancient13–16-0.0516%31 Mar →
inferno8–80.0616%31 Mar →
dust215–15-0.0518%25 Mar →
nuke16–13-0.0218%25 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.0638%15 Mar →
dust211–130.0015%15 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0314%15 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0119%25 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0413%24 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0211%24 Feb →
inferno13–40.0923%24 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0312%23 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0422%23 Feb →
mirage13–70.0014%21 Feb →
inferno13–9-0.0813%21 Feb →
inferno1–9-0.2912%21 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0314%17 Feb →
overpass13–110.0022%17 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0118%17 Feb →
nuke13–5-0.0114%17 Feb →
vertigo7–9-0.0522%17 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0511%14 Feb →
inferno13–90.0037%14 Feb →
overpass13–50.0722%14 Feb →
inferno11–130.0228%13 Feb →
mirage13–20.067%12 Feb →
overpass13–6-0.0513%12 Feb →
overpass2–7-0.0816%11 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0525%11 Feb →
dust213–100.0026%10 Feb →
dust24–13-0.0022%10 Feb →
nuke13–90.0416%10 Feb →
mirage13–5-0.0315%9 Feb →
mirage13–110.0518%6 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0510%4 Feb →
inferno13–4-0.0010%4 Feb →
vertigo7–90.0128%4 Feb →
mirage13–80.0724%29 Jan →
inferno13–8-0.0015%28 Jan →
anubis13–80.0121%28 Jan →
dust21–13-0.0531%25 Jan →
mirage9–13-0.0312%23 Jan →
anubis10–13-0.0812%23 Jan →
mirage3–13-0.0824%19 Jan →
inferno15–15-0.0121%13 Jan →
inferno13–80.0422%13 Jan →
nuke6–13-0.0218%12 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.