Reddric Nagaud IV — CS2 Stats

GB76561198092523889[U:1:132258161]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,893Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since

5,466Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.6 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating27,020Top 5% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5853 of 252577 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,484 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,020 +3,330 19 Aug – 14 Oct · 29 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,484 +0 30 Aug – 1 Sept · 3 observations

28,135Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,484Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

31Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,484
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 16 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

907 below peak (27,927)
+2,426 over 30 days · improving
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,980 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,061), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	42.1%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	10.6%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.17	1.09
Match win rate	46.2%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning76

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWWWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

5–0 · 100% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

7–3 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 483ms

Last 20

12–8 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 500ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim9.1

Utility4.9

Positioning7.6

Opening Duels5.8

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning7.6

Utility4.9

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels7.4

Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time504ms+24ms

first ⅓ avg 480ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms

Headshot accuracy19.4%−2.6%

first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 27 Aug →

41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · dust2, 16 Aug →

344msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 8 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak

W7Current streak

15–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 12cacheWeakest map · 38% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	22	10–12	45%	0.01
mirage	B	20	9–11	45%	0.03
inferno	A	16	9–7	56%	0.02
cache	C	13	5–8	38%	0.05
anubis	S	12	10–2	83%	0.05
nuke	A	9	5–4	56%	0.03
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	0.04
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

143,472Lifetime kills

1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

6,456Matches

46.2%Match win rate

42.1%Headshot %

10.6%Shot accuracy

25,386MVPs

2,638Hours (in match)

6,753Bombs planted

1,923Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,082

AWP35,027

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,855

P2000 / USP-S8,265

Desert Eagle7,898

Glock-184,625

P2503,680

Tec-93,213

Five-SeveN2,917

SSG 082,779

Lifetime map wins

24,687dust2

6,580inferno

1,916nuke

1,372vertigo

1,004office

942cbble

917train

463lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

785Matches

53%Win rate

1.31Avg K/D

90.9ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	258	53%	1.33	18.7
Dust2	227	55%	1.35	18.9
Inferno	114	56%	1.25	18.4
Anubis	57	60%	1.28	19.0
Ancient	41	37%	1.24	18.2
Overpass	32	62%	1.43	18.6
Nuke	26	31%	1.21	19.0
Vertigo	15	60%	1.48	18.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy

42.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.3%Spray accuracy

78.5%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

507msReaction time

65.6%T opening success

53.4%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

4.7%Flash assists

7.53HE damage / grenade

7.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–11	-0.04	23%	14 Oct →
inferno	13–8	0.02	29%	14 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.07	21%	14 Oct →
anubis	13–7	0.04	39%	14 Oct →
mirage	16–12	-0.04	16%	14 Oct →
nuke	9–3	0.07	9%	13 Oct →
inferno	9–7	0.15	19%	13 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	14%	13 Oct →
anubis	10–13	0.04	23%	13 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	3%	12 Oct →
ancient	13–7	0.07	13%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.07	27%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	28%	11 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	10%	11 Oct →
cache	4–13	-0.00	32%	11 Oct →
anubis	11–13	0.06	21%	10 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	18%	10 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	27%	10 Oct →
nuke	13–7	0.07	23%	10 Oct →
nuke	16–14	0.00	20%	9 Oct →
inferno	6–13	-0.08	14%	9 Oct →
nuke	10–13	0.12	27%	8 Oct →
anubis	13–7	0.01	15%	8 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.11	10%	8 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.02	16%	8 Oct →
dust2	15–15	0.05	25%	8 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.05	16%	7 Oct →
ancient	4–13	0.05	24%	7 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.02	13%	7 Oct →
cache	6–13	0.04	18%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.03	20%	7 Oct →
anubis	13–1	0.07	16%	7 Oct →
cache	5–13	-0.04	13%	4 Oct →
dust2	8–13	0.07	15%	4 Oct →
cache	11–13	0.04	23%	4 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	21%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–7	0.08	21%	3 Oct →
cache	10–13	0.01	24%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.05	17%	28 Sept →
inferno	9–1	0.01	12%	28 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	25%	28 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.02	4%	28 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.07	18%	27 Sept →
cache	13–0	0.09	21%	27 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.03	19%	24 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.03	11%	24 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.02	17%	24 Sept →
inferno	13–3	0.03	8%	24 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.06	16%	23 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.12	20%	23 Sept →
cache	9–13	0.08	20%	23 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	18%	23 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.17	22%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.15	20%	23 Sept →
anubis	13–5	0.14	16%	21 Sept →
inferno	7–9	-0.06	21%	21 Sept →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	25%	21 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.08	9%	21 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	20%	21 Sept →
inferno	0–6	0.01	40%	21 Sept →
inferno	13–5	0.11	34%	21 Sept →
dust2	6–13	0.03	29%	21 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.05	22%	20 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.05	31%	20 Sept →
cache	8–13	0.05	17%	20 Sept →
nuke	9–13	0.01	22%	20 Sept →
anubis	13–5	0.04	26%	19 Sept →
inferno	4–9	-0.14	21%	16 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	5%	14 Sept →
cache	13–10	0.02	14%	14 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.06	25%	11 Sept →
cache	14–16	0.07	29%	11 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.02	19%	9 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.05	38%	9 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.06	25%	8 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.00	15%	8 Sept →
ancient	9–13	0.01	14%	8 Sept →
nuke	12–16	0.00	19%	8 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	13%	28 Aug →
inferno	9–1	0.18	17%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	23%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.06	25%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	33%	25 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.01	21%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	20%	24 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	24%	24 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	31%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	21%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	18%	21 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.01	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.07	14%	21 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.02	16%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	15%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	19%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	41%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.03	25%	16 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	34%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	32%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–9	-0.02	19%	16 Aug →
overpass	9–1	0.16	24%	16 Aug →