willy — CS2 Stats

76561198091221948[U:1:130956220]✓ No bans

6,188Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#20767 of 24965 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,953 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,953Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,953
Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 47 to go
Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning64

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–41–4Last 10055%Win rateLWLLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2

Aggression9.6

Utility4.3

Positioning6.4

Opening Duels4.2

Clutch3.6

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning6.4

Utility4.3

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time540ms−14ms

first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms

Headshot accuracy22.7%+3.0%

first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–0Biggest win — dust2

10Longest win streak

7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 50% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	42	23–19	55%	0.04
nuke	B	21	11–10	52%	0.02
dust2	B	16	8–8	50%	0.05
ancient	S	13	9–4	69%	0.05
cache	—	3	3–0	100%	0.02
office	—	2	0–2	0%	0.02
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.11
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,626Matches

52%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

83.9ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	936	54%	1.24	17.1
Ancient	434	51%	1.22	16.8
Nuke	361	55%	1.22	16.8
Dust2	256	52%	1.15	15.9
Anubis	220	49%	1.13	16.5
Vertigo	152	57%	1.22	16.8
Inferno	47	53%	1.11	14.4
Train	44	45%	1.04	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.3%Spray accuracy

77.2%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

540msReaction time

56.1%T opening success

37.5%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

9.2%Flash assists

6.35HE damage / grenade

4.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4192 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 37.4787% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	4–13	-0.09	27%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.11	19%	23 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.09	23%	23 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.06	29%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.05	28%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.08	29%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.15	23%	9 Jul →
cache	7–0	0.03	14%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.08	26%	2 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	26%	2 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	29%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.02	29%	29 Jun →
nuke	0–13	-0.09	0%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.10	28%	27 Jun →
mirage	0–5	-0.09	0%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.08	21%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	21%	22 May →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	17%	22 May →
office	12–12	0.03	15%	13 May →
office	2–13	0.00	38%	13 May →
cache	13–5	-0.00	28%	9 May →
cache	13–9	0.04	32%	9 May →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	25%	3 May →
mirage	10–13	0.13	33%	26 Apr →
ancient	13–10	0.06	16%	26 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.02	18%	25 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.03	25%	19 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	12%	15 Apr →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	32%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.07	30%	15 Apr →
nuke	5–13	0.01	23%	15 Apr →
ancient	16–14	0.05	17%	13 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.05	19%	8 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.06	15%	8 Apr →
nuke	13–9	0.05	25%	8 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.08	26%	6 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.08	27%	6 Apr →
mirage	15–15	0.00	16%	1 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.04	27%	1 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.07	25%	1 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	26%	31 Mar →
ancient	13–11	0.03	15%	31 Mar →
dust2	13–8	0.11	22%	29 Mar →
overpass	7–13	-0.05	15%	29 Mar →
nuke	10–13	0.08	18%	27 Mar →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	20%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–3	0.06	11%	26 Mar →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	17%	26 Mar →
dust2	13–0	0.16	26%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–3	0.04	19%	26 Mar →
mirage	0–5	-0.07	0%	26 Mar →
dust2	6–13	0.08	19%	25 Mar →
mirage	16–13	0.08	22%	25 Mar →
mirage	6–13	0.12	27%	25 Mar →
dust2	13–11	0.01	26%	21 Mar →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	22%	21 Mar →
mirage	16–13	0.00	19%	18 Mar →
nuke	16–12	0.05	16%	18 Mar →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	9%	18 Mar →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	16%	17 Mar →
nuke	10–13	0.05	17%	17 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.09	38%	12 Mar →
dust2	11–13	0.01	17%	12 Mar →
nuke	3–13	0.03	19%	12 Mar →
ancient	13–9	0.03	7%	12 Mar →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	11%	12 Mar →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	17%	4 Mar →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	7%	4 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.01	18%	2 Mar →
nuke	13–2	0.01	25%	2 Mar →
nuke	16–13	-0.01	10%	1 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.07	17%	27 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.07	25%	27 Feb →
nuke	13–10	0.07	26%	26 Feb →
dust2	14–16	0.03	25%	26 Feb →
mirage	7–13	0.03	17%	26 Feb →
dust2	9–13	0.14	18%	26 Feb →
dust2	13–4	0.17	28%	25 Feb →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	10%	25 Feb →
nuke	13–9	-0.06	8%	24 Feb →
mirage	13–4	0.04	29%	19 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.03	26%	18 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.14	17%	17 Feb →
ancient	13–11	0.10	22%	17 Feb →
nuke	13–4	0.14	21%	17 Feb →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	13%	17 Feb →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	13%	16 Feb →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	14%	15 Feb →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	23%	15 Feb →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	22%	13 Feb →
mirage	13–4	0.07	14%	12 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.11	27%	12 Feb →
ancient	13–6	0.16	23%	10 Feb →
dust2	15–15	0.04	20%	10 Feb →
dust2	13–4	0.09	19%	8 Feb →
mirage	8–13	0.02	17%	8 Feb →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	20%	7 Feb →
mirage	12–12	0.08	17%	4 Feb →
mirage	13–3	0.09	21%	4 Feb →
nuke	13–2	0.04	37%	4 Feb →