röpö

röpö — CS2 Stats

FM76561198233284056[U:1:273018328]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

632Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (33 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+3Tracked matches · now 632
−1.3ppWin rate · 64.3% → 63.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,177 +4,373 2 Feb – 3 Jul · 19 days played
22,80428,210peak 28,2102 Feb3 Jul
28,210Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-02-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGröpöFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning67
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY67–28–5Last 10067%Win rateWWTLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.9pp headshot accuracy · +54ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.3
Utility6.9
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels6.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.7
Utility6.9
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact9.3

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time571ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.49Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 23 Mar →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 10 Jul →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · nuke, 3 Feb →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 3 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 74% over 23infernoWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3122–971%0.05
nukeS2317–674%0.09
ancientS1410–471%0.04
infernoB115–645%0.10
dust2A106–460%0.04
cache—43–175%0.11
office—42–250%0.08
vertigo—22–0100%0.22
overpass—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

211Matches
65%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
—ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1464%1.1516.8
Vertigo683%1.3518.7
Ancient580%1.4120.6
Nuke367%0.9611.0
Anubis250%1.4916.0
Inferno1100%1.2624.0
Dust21100%1.4516.0
Overpass10%0.8713.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
569msReaction time
40.8%T opening success
64.8%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
10.07HE damage / grenade
11.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.1317%24 Sept →
mirage13–60.0817%24 Sept →
inferno12–120.0420%24 Sept →
nuke4–130.0120%23 Aug →
vertigo13–50.0311%23 Aug →
nuke3–130.0123%28 Jul →
mirage13–50.0121%28 Jul →
inferno2–3-0.0525%11 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0331%11 Jul →
dust22–130.0148%11 Jul →
mirage16–12-0.0126%10 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0350%10 Jul →
mirage13–30.1044%10 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0322%10 Jul →
mirage13–40.1219%9 Jul →
ancient13–20.1324%9 Jul →
cache7–00.1538%9 Jul →
nuke13–50.0822%8 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0420%3 Jul →
ancient5–130.0224%3 Jul →
inferno9–130.0425%3 Jul →
nuke13–40.0429%29 Jun →
nuke0–13-0.070%29 Jun →
mirage13–70.0716%27 Jun →
nuke13–110.0016%3 Jun →
mirage13–60.0830%20 May →
inferno9–60.1735%17 May →
inferno13–90.1622%17 May →
nuke13–110.0421%17 May →
mirage12–120.0614%14 May →
office13–60.2036%14 May →
office13–20.1624%14 May →
cache13–50.1928%9 May →
nuke13–20.1317%30 Apr →
inferno10–130.0714%30 Apr →
cache13–50.1520%30 Apr →
ancient16–14-0.0120%12 Apr →
nuke13–80.1027%8 Apr →
mirage13–110.0323%6 Apr →
ancient13–60.0410%6 Apr →
mirage13–80.0518%1 Apr →
mirage7–130.0734%31 Mar →
overpass7–13-0.0322%29 Mar →
ancient7–130.0416%26 Mar →
mirage13–30.0720%26 Mar →
nuke6–13-0.0019%26 Mar →
mirage0–5-0.0811%26 Mar →
mirage6–130.0425%25 Mar →
dust213–90.1025%24 Mar →
vertigo9–10.4033%24 Mar →
nuke9–40.1714%24 Mar →
inferno9–00.3344%24 Mar →
nuke9–00.4910%23 Mar →
inferno13–10.1027%23 Mar →
office5–130.0217%23 Mar →
office1–7-0.0429%23 Mar →
mirage13–80.1514%18 Mar →
inferno9–130.0124%14 Mar →
mirage11–130.0428%14 Mar →
mirage13–50.0125%12 Mar →
ancient13–50.0619%4 Mar →
dust213–60.0918%4 Mar →
nuke10–130.0919%3 Mar →
ancient13–90.0527%3 Mar →
nuke13–20.0528%3 Mar →
mirage13–50.1327%3 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0129%2 Mar →
nuke13–20.1332%2 Mar →
nuke12–120.0525%26 Feb →
mirage9–10.0336%25 Feb →
ancient13–80.1325%25 Feb →
mirage13–90.0513%14 Feb →
nuke13–30.1115%14 Feb →
dust213–40.0223%14 Feb →
mirage13–60.0137%14 Feb →
nuke13–90.0917%13 Feb →
dust212–120.0525%13 Feb →
mirage13–40.1622%13 Feb →
dust213–40.1321%13 Feb →
nuke13–30.1616%13 Feb →
inferno7–10.1432%13 Feb →
mirage10–130.0613%13 Feb →
ancient13–90.0313%12 Feb →
nuke13–50.0129%10 Feb →
ancient16–140.0026%10 Feb →
mirage7–20.0117%10 Feb →
dust213–100.0119%10 Feb →
nuke13–20.1020%4 Feb →
dust213–50.0537%4 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0123%4 Feb →
nuke13–70.1120%3 Feb →
mirage3–130.0020%3 Feb →
mirage13–60.0719%3 Feb →
ancient13–00.0225%3 Feb →
ancient8–130.0214%3 Feb →
ancient16–120.0720%3 Feb →
mirage13–70.0416%3 Feb →
mirage13–10.0413%3 Feb →
inferno13–160.0829%2 Feb →
mirage12–160.0418%2 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.