Sn4k3

Sn4k3 — CS2 Stats

76561198089207957[U:1:128942229]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,947Tracked matches77%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,943Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29910 of 230430 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 20 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,943 +75 20 Aug19 Sept · 17 days played
22,92425,115peak 25,11520 Aug19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,197 +0 1 Sept10 Sept · 2 observations
1,1971,197peak 1,1971 Sept10 Sept
25,115Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,197Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,197
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 4 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,172 below peak (25,115)
  • +75 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,057 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSn4k3PREMIER23,943 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,197csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning46
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY67285Last 10067%Win rateLLLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility4.8
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.6
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time531ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 543ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–0 · vertigo, 1 Sept
63%Best headshot accuracy · 7–0 · vertigo, 18 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 15 Sept
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L3Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

boulderBest map · 100% over 6anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoS3328585%-0.01
cacheC114736%-0.04
anubisD103730%-0.06
nukeS108280%-0.03
ancientA95456%-0.03
fachwerkS75271%-0.04
boulderS660100%-0.01
infernoS54180%-0.02
overpassC52340%0.00
train2020%-0.07
office110100%-0.03
shelter110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,299Matches
51%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
70.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4747%0.639.9
Inferno3644%0.7911.5
Ancient3358%0.6711.8
Nuke3145%0.7610.2
Vertigo2948%0.6210.1
Iris1782%0.8610.0
Biome1593%0.878.2
Dust21436%0.7511.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
88.0%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
529msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
13.49HE damage / grenade
4.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4468 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3941% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis6–13-0.0611%19 Sept
anubis1–6-0.0829%19 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0817%19 Sept
ancient16–12-0.0521%19 Sept
cache13–30.0221%19 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0121%19 Sept
office13–6-0.0315%19 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.0010%19 Sept
vertigo7–00.0663%18 Sept
cache10–13-0.0417%18 Sept
nuke13–20.0713%18 Sept
cache13–8-0.0417%17 Sept
boulder13–8-0.0431%17 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.0314%17 Sept
vertigo13–30.0554%16 Sept
cache9–13-0.0919%16 Sept
vertigo13–1-0.0115%16 Sept
vertigo13–10-0.0325%15 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0825%15 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0219%15 Sept
vertigo13–30.0624%15 Sept
fachwerk13–2-0.0131%14 Sept
vertigo13–60.0322%14 Sept
anubis13–10-0.1012%14 Sept
overpass9–40.0528%14 Sept
vertigo13–3-0.0513%13 Sept
fachwerk13–9-0.0612%13 Sept
boulder13–20.0116%13 Sept
vertigo6–13-0.0619%11 Sept
vertigo9–2-0.0432%11 Sept
vertigo3–13-0.0922%10 Sept
vertigo13–7-0.0520%9 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0824%9 Sept
overpass4–13-0.0219%9 Sept
vertigo13–6-0.0423%9 Sept
shelter13–110.0019%8 Sept
vertigo13–8-0.0018%8 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0831%8 Sept
train2–13-0.1115%8 Sept
vertigo13–10.0031%7 Sept
overpass12–12-0.0224%7 Sept
cache12–120.0120%7 Sept
vertigo13–3-0.0223%4 Sept
overpass13–50.027%4 Sept
fachwerk13–5-0.0211%4 Sept
cache13–6-0.1031%4 Sept
vertigo13–3-0.0412%4 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0117%4 Sept
vertigo12–12-0.0325%3 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.0015%3 Sept
train10–13-0.0328%3 Sept
vertigo13–8-0.0539%2 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0715%2 Sept
boulder13–30.0111%2 Sept
nuke13–11-0.077%2 Sept
vertigo13–11-0.0215%1 Sept
vertigo13–00.1112%1 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0614%1 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0526%1 Sept
vertigo13–3-0.0515%31 Aug
fachwerk13–10.0220%31 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0112%31 Aug
vertigo13–30.0211%30 Aug
vertigo1–13-0.0713%30 Aug
overpass11–13-0.0221%30 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0412%29 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0618%29 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0331%28 Aug
vertigo13–00.0034%28 Aug
cache10–13-0.0234%28 Aug
boulder13–1-0.0128%27 Aug
nuke0–2-0.110%27 Aug
ancient13–6-0.017%27 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0321%27 Aug
cache13–1-0.0917%26 Aug
inferno13–110.0721%26 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0212%26 Aug
vertigo13–6-0.136%26 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0414%26 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0312%25 Aug
inferno13–9-0.049%25 Aug
ancient13–40.079%25 Aug
fachwerk13–2-0.0315%25 Aug
vertigo13–2-0.038%25 Aug
boulder13–80.0121%25 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0927%25 Aug
ancient13–80.0331%25 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0518%24 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0112%24 Aug
cache11–13-0.0818%24 Aug
fachwerk3–8-0.0615%23 Aug
cache10–13-0.0225%23 Aug
boulder13–11-0.0328%22 Aug
fachwerk8–13-0.1011%22 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.0022%22 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0224%21 Aug
cache10–13-0.0128%20 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0041%20 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0526%20 Aug
vertigo13–20.1022%20 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →