Apothecarious

Apothecarious — CS2 Stats

US76561198088765799[U:1:128500071]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,209Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,402Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#72281 of 239376 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,463 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 20 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,402 -1,153 20 Jul19 Sept · 11 days played
20,34521,712peak 21,71220 Jul19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,463 +0 28 Aug31 Aug · 2 observations
1,4631,463peak 1,46328 Aug31 Aug
21,712Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,463Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-07-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,463
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 68 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,310 below peak (21,712)
  • -320 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,598 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGApothecariousFACEITLevel 8 · 1,463 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,402 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,463csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning58
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39556Last 10039%Win rateTLLWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +57ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility7.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch4.4

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.8
Utility7.6
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time537ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 19 Sept
29%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 24 Aug
47msFastest reaction time · 2–1 · cache, 5 Aug
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 13 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 54% over 13infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC23101343%0.01
anubisB1991047%0.03
cacheD1851328%0.02
nukeB137654%0.03
ancientD93633%0.02
dust2D82625%0.01
infernoD71614%0.02
vertigo21150%0.02
office110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

227Matches
53%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
82.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6656%1.2516.4
Anubis4048%1.2616.8
Nuke2483%1.6818.9
Inferno2438%1.2315.3
Ancient2348%1.2918.4
Dust22138%1.2017.3
Vertigo1155%1.2118.8
Cache944%1.2415.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
526msReaction time
42.1%T opening success
44.4%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
8.52HE damage / grenade
14.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–12-0.0117%22 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0613%21 Sept
dust27–13-0.0120%21 Sept
vertigo13–70.0720%20 Sept
mirage5–130.0112%19 Sept
cache10–130.0723%19 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0012%19 Sept
inferno7–90.0228%19 Sept
anubis16–19-0.014%19 Sept
mirage13–70.1917%19 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0724%19 Sept
dust213–10-0.0015%15 Sept
anubis13–00.138%13 Sept
cache12–16-0.0120%13 Sept
cache13–11-0.029%12 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0111%12 Sept
nuke16–140.0012%11 Sept
mirage10–130.0212%11 Sept
anubis12–10.1121%11 Sept
nuke12–120.0418%11 Sept
inferno6–9-0.0514%10 Sept
nuke13–100.0413%10 Sept
anubis9–130.0416%5 Sept
dust28–130.0218%4 Sept
mirage8–13-0.028%4 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0115%4 Sept
mirage13–60.018%3 Sept
cache13–40.0627%3 Sept
mirage13–110.0820%2 Sept
cache12–120.0213%2 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0416%2 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0523%2 Sept
nuke5–130.0313%1 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0210%26 Aug
nuke13–60.0213%26 Aug
anubis13–90.0614%26 Aug
ancient13–90.0510%26 Aug
nuke13–30.0514%26 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0117%25 Aug
anubis13–1-0.0021%25 Aug
cache13–20.129%25 Aug
nuke16–140.0411%25 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.0214%25 Aug
cache10–13-0.009%25 Aug
nuke4–130.0621%25 Aug
mirage8–130.0515%24 Aug
cache12–120.0418%24 Aug
dust29–13-0.0329%24 Aug
mirage10–0-0.0017%24 Aug
ancient2–130.057%23 Aug
nuke8–130.099%23 Aug
cache9–130.099%23 Aug
inferno12–120.1010%13 Aug
mirage7–130.0822%13 Aug
cache11–13-0.0216%13 Aug
anubis13–80.0314%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.008%12 Aug
ancient10–130.0026%12 Aug
dust25–13-0.0014%9 Aug
anubis11–130.0714%9 Aug
cache1–13-0.004%9 Aug
ancient5–130.0711%9 Aug
dust23–13-0.0015%9 Aug
anubis4–130.087%9 Aug
office13–80.0527%7 Aug
anubis16–140.0125%7 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0410%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0518%6 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0216%6 Aug
anubis13–60.0124%6 Aug
inferno9–30.1829%5 Aug
cache2–10.030%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0124%5 Aug
anubis7–130.0319%4 Aug
cache11–13-0.0024%4 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0615%4 Aug
nuke13–10.1315%3 Aug
mirage5–13-0.039%3 Aug
anubis7–13-0.059%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0116%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.0017%30 Jul
cache8–13-0.0124%30 Jul
cache11–130.0020%30 Jul
cache13–10.0921%29 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0313%29 Jul
dust213–10.0918%29 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0111%29 Jul
anubis13–100.0317%29 Jul
cache9–130.0011%28 Jul
anubis6–130.019%28 Jul
cache8–13-0.0327%28 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0215%28 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0215%28 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0314%21 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0111%20 Jul
ancient13–90.0915%20 Jul
anubis3–130.0216%20 Jul
mirage5–130.0420%20 Jul
mirage12–120.1020%20 Jul
nuke13–90.0118%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →