Contagious_-

Contagious_- — CS2 Stats

GB76561198088717403[U:1:128451675]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

852Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,755Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60138 of 261549 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Dec 2025 (346 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,755 +1,755 14 Nov – 3 Dec · 18 days played
19,46224,566peak 24,56614 Nov3 Dec
24,944Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2025-11-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,811 below peak (24,566)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,245 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGContagious_-FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,755 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning50
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–52–2Last 10046%Win rateLWLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 677ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 664ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.0
Utility5.4
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time661ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 661ms
Headshot accuracy25.2%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · train, 18 Nov →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 20 Nov →
422msFastest reaction time · 7–0 · inferno, 20 Nov →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 25 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 18dust2Weakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3213–1941%0.02
infernoS1812–667%0.03
dust2D134–931%0.00
ancientB136–746%0.00
overpassD93–633%-0.00
nukeA95–456%0.00
trainB63–350%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

631Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
97.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2945%0.9712.7
Anubis1953%1.0514.4
Vertigo1850%0.9316.2
Ancient1765%1.0514.8
Overpass650%1.2114.8
Inferno650%1.1515.2
Nuke367%1.3019.3
Dust21100%1.4423.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
88.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
664msReaction time
22.9%T opening success
53.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
8.67HE damage / grenade
9.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.8504% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0231%3 Dec →
ancient13–90.0028%3 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.0432%2 Dec →
overpass8–13-0.0326%2 Dec →
dust23–130.0439%2 Dec →
inferno8–130.0524%1 Dec →
nuke11–130.0230%1 Dec →
mirage13–110.0227%1 Dec →
inferno13–110.0725%1 Dec →
mirage11–130.0022%1 Dec →
ancient13–16-0.0227%1 Dec →
overpass10–130.0427%30 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.019%28 Nov →
train13–50.1126%28 Nov →
mirage9–130.0525%28 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0635%28 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0124%28 Nov →
dust213–90.0924%28 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0619%28 Nov →
mirage13–100.0122%28 Nov →
nuke16–14-0.0236%27 Nov →
inferno13–8-0.0719%27 Nov →
overpass9–13-0.0522%27 Nov →
mirage13–40.0616%27 Nov →
ancient9–13-0.0222%27 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0222%27 Nov →
mirage3–60.1424%27 Nov →
mirage4–90.0828%27 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0518%26 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0724%26 Nov →
overpass1–13-0.0432%26 Nov →
mirage13–100.0626%26 Nov →
inferno13–20.0821%25 Nov →
ancient13–80.0036%25 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0320%25 Nov →
inferno13–70.0527%25 Nov →
mirage13–5-0.0430%25 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0117%25 Nov →
mirage13–16-0.0120%24 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0227%24 Nov →
nuke4–13-0.0417%24 Nov →
inferno10–130.0626%24 Nov →
overpass13–90.0521%24 Nov →
inferno13–110.0236%24 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0638%24 Nov →
mirage13–3-0.0217%24 Nov →
ancient13–7-0.0232%24 Nov →
dust216–130.0319%24 Nov →
nuke13–40.0423%23 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0222%23 Nov →
mirage13–60.0526%23 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.0228%23 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0030%23 Nov →
train5–13-0.0614%23 Nov →
inferno13–70.0117%23 Nov →
ancient2–130.0325%23 Nov →
mirage8–130.0119%23 Nov →
mirage5–130.0740%22 Nov →
mirage9–130.1123%22 Nov →
train8–13-0.0234%22 Nov →
overpass2–13-0.0523%21 Nov →
ancient13–20.0021%21 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.0126%21 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0026%21 Nov →
train13–11-0.0210%20 Nov →
mirage13–80.0419%20 Nov →
inferno13–80.0224%20 Nov →
ancient2–13-0.0224%20 Nov →
ancient13–40.1218%20 Nov →
overpass13–30.0623%20 Nov →
dust22–13-0.0040%20 Nov →
dust213–80.0225%20 Nov →
inferno13–8-0.0116%20 Nov →
mirage13–50.0431%20 Nov →
inferno7–00.1039%20 Nov →
inferno13–30.1826%20 Nov →
overpass13–9-0.0038%19 Nov →
overpass13–160.0130%19 Nov →
mirage13–70.0825%19 Nov →
train6–13-0.0526%18 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0327%18 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0120%18 Nov →
mirage13–70.0328%18 Nov →
dust28–130.0222%18 Nov →
train13–70.1838%18 Nov →
inferno16–14-0.0024%18 Nov →
ancient10–130.0419%18 Nov →
dust27–130.0226%17 Nov →
mirage15–15-0.0211%17 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0022%17 Nov →
inferno9–130.0322%17 Nov →
mirage11–130.0412%17 Nov →
nuke13–80.0014%17 Nov →
mirage15–150.0314%17 Nov →
inferno13–5-0.0115%17 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.0816%16 Nov →
nuke13–70.1021%16 Nov →
nuke13–70.0121%16 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0716%16 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.038%14 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.