GiveawaySign In
๐’…’

๐’…’ โ€” CS2 Stats

CX76561199802519855[U:1:1842254127]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

1,087Tracked matches30%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating13,420Blue band ยท top ~36.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#165228 of 261551 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 ยท 1,880 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (73 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then โ€” still 1,087 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,420 -906 18 Jul โ€“ 2 Sept ยท 21 days played
13,42019,189peak 19,18918 Jul2 Sept
19,916Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,880Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-07-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak โ€” 1,880
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 โ€” 121 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 ยท Level 8 ยท Level 7 ยท Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,769 below peak (19,189)
  • -4,312 over 30 days ยท declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 โ€” 1,580 to go
  • Reached: Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDBโ€™s own observation โ€” no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐’…’FACEITLevel 8 ยท 1,880 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER13,420 ยท Blue bandPEAK ELO1,880csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning53
Utility48

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46โ€“49โ€“5Last 10046%Win rateLLLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’20pp win rate ยท +0.00 avg rating ยท โˆ’1.1pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’38ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1โ€“4 ยท 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 10

  • 3โ€“7 ยท 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 20

  • 8โ€“12 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder โ€” No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim4.8
Utility4.8
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped โ€” moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning5.3
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01โˆ’0.00
first โ…“ avg 0.02 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.01
Reaction time662msโˆ’4ms
first โ…“ avg 666ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%โˆ’2.6%
first โ…“ avg 23.0% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating ยท 13โ€“1 ยท inferno, 2 Aug โ†’
48%Best headshot accuracy ยท 13โ€“5 ยท cache, 1 Aug โ†’
484msFastest reaction time ยท 14โ€“16 ยท mirage, 17 Aug โ†’
13โ€“1Biggest win ยท inferno, 2 Aug โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L4Current streak
5โ€“7In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map ยท 64% over 14anubisWeakest map ยท 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2715โ€“1256%0.02
cacheB147โ€“750%0.04
infernoA149โ€“564%0.05
mirageD134โ€“931%0.03
nukeD124โ€“833%0.02
anubisD101โ€“910%-0.04
dust2A106โ€“460%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

308Matches
53%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
88.3ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6853%1.0617.3
Inferno6053%1.2318.1
Nuke5056%1.0417.3
Ancient4544%1.0616.6
Dust23656%1.0917.1
Anubis2157%1.2118.7
Overpass1669%1.3220.9
Train850%1.0619.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
69.2%Counter-strafing
10.5ยฐPreaim
637msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
7.27HE damage / grenade
8.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1436% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy โ†’Anubis grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9โ€“13-0.0527%28 Aug โ†’
nuke3โ€“13-0.0816%26 Aug โ†’
mirage14โ€“16-0.0025%17 Aug โ†’
cache7โ€“130.0022%16 Aug โ†’
ancient16โ€“120.0617%16 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“9-0.0524%16 Aug โ†’
ancient4โ€“130.0112%16 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.1224%16 Aug โ†’
nuke11โ€“130.0717%13 Aug โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.0211%13 Aug โ†’
cache2โ€“130.0326%12 Aug โ†’
ancient5โ€“130.0322%12 Aug โ†’
nuke22โ€“20-0.0427%11 Aug โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.0720%11 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“11-0.0220%10 Aug โ†’
inferno14โ€“160.0322%10 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.0219%10 Aug โ†’
ancient16โ€“130.0116%9 Aug โ†’
cache5โ€“130.0117%9 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“40.0216%9 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“160.0212%8 Aug โ†’
ancient7โ€“130.0111%8 Aug โ†’
inferno15โ€“150.1015%7 Aug โ†’
ancient10โ€“130.0026%7 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“16-0.0023%7 Aug โ†’
cache8โ€“130.0923%7 Aug โ†’
nuke7โ€“130.0427%7 Aug โ†’
mirage15โ€“150.0323%7 Aug โ†’
cache15โ€“150.0517%7 Aug โ†’
ancient10โ€“130.0221%7 Aug โ†’
nuke7โ€“130.0614%7 Aug โ†’
dust28โ€“13-0.0434%7 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.0224%7 Aug โ†’
ancient3โ€“13-0.0326%6 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“5-0.0216%6 Aug โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0513%6 Aug โ†’
mirage2โ€“13-0.0117%6 Aug โ†’
anubis9โ€“13-0.017%6 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.0134%6 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.0620%6 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“50.0821%5 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0915%5 Aug โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.0519%5 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“160.0321%5 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“50.0721%5 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.1417%5 Aug โ†’
ancient16โ€“140.0523%4 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0519%4 Aug โ†’
ancient3โ€“130.0736%4 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0530%4 Aug โ†’
ancient15โ€“150.0723%3 Aug โ†’
anubis3โ€“13-0.0414%3 Aug โ†’
ancient4โ€“130.1025%3 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“100.0529%3 Aug โ†’
cache2โ€“13-0.0133%3 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.0832%3 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.1120%3 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0825%3 Aug โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0220%2 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.0320%2 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“10-0.0617%2 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“80.0027%2 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“10-0.0220%2 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0112%2 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.0124%2 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“10.1526%2 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“100.0637%2 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“4-0.0532%2 Aug โ†’
anubis15โ€“15-0.0315%2 Aug โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0735%1 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“5-0.0348%1 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“8-0.0815%1 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.0330%1 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.0328%1 Aug โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0122%1 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0826%1 Aug โ†’
dust214โ€“160.0116%25 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0714%25 Jul โ†’
anubis8โ€“130.0113%25 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“10-0.0019%25 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0027%25 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0722%25 Jul โ†’
nuke8โ€“130.0320%25 Jul โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.0721%24 Jul โ†’
inferno16โ€“130.1017%24 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.0925%24 Jul โ†’
anubis10โ€“13-0.0225%24 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“70.0830%24 Jul โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.0215%19 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“80.0727%19 Jul โ†’
cache5โ€“130.0425%18 Jul โ†’
inferno11โ€“130.0115%18 Jul โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0233%18 Jul โ†’
nuke10โ€“130.1424%18 Jul โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0120%18 Jul โ†’
cache8โ€“10.0324%18 Jul โ†’
mirage8โ€“130.0723%18 Jul โ†’
anubis2โ€“13-0.0416%18 Jul โ†’
ancient14โ€“160.0119%18 Jul โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0416%18 Jul โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.

Explore CSDB.gg

Related

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other gameseDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPIcm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turnResolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutionsCrosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

CS2 Skin WordleName the skin from an extreme close-upModel AccuracyPrediction model accuracy statsTeam Head-to-HeadCompare pro team stats

Learn & Explore

CS2 vs Rainbow Six SiegeDestructibility and operators vs pure utilityCS2 Player Roles ExplainedEntry, support, AWPer, lurker, IGLCS2 Fixes & TroubleshootingStep-by-step fixes for every common CS2 problem