desk

desk — CS2 Stats

76561198087456578[U:1:127190850]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,880Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,080Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (38 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,810 → 1,810
+11Tracked matches · now 1,880
+1.9ppWin rate · 46.4% → 48.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,810 +0 31 Aug – 10 Sept · 2 observations
1,8101,810peak 1,81031 Aug10 Sept
1,810Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-02-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,810
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 191 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdeskPEAK ELO1,810csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning48
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–52–7Last 10041%Win rateWWLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility3.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 672ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.8
Utility3.9
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time681ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 681ms
Headshot accuracy28.4%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 28.2% → last ⅓ avg 28.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.37Best match rating · 4–0 · inferno, 12 Feb →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · nuke, 6 Sept →
445msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 3 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2311–1248%-0.00
dust2D227–1532%-0.03
ancientD144–1029%0.00
infernoC135–838%0.03
nukeD113–827%-0.00
anubisA74–357%0.03
cacheS64–267%-0.01
overpass—32–167%0.01
train—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

156,019Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
4,945Matches
39.9%Match win rate
67.6%Headshot % · Top 5% of tracked players
7.5%Shot accuracy
8,633MVPs
9,280Hours (in match)
3,522Bombs planted
809Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4782,923
AWP6,594
P2502,096
MP91,625
FAMAS1,548

Lifetime map wins

8,937dust2
4,235inferno
2,882nuke
1,905vertigo
1,146train
202office
168cbble
62dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

437Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
74.3ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10050%0.8914.6
Dust28548%1.0615.3
Ancient8452%1.0916.1
Anubis6450%1.0214.8
Nuke3554%1.0516.6
Inferno3152%1.0013.2
Overpass2232%0.8314.1
Train1145%0.9015.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.3%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
86.8%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
672msReaction time
40.3%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
7.07HE damage / grenade
5.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.496 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.0018%17 Oct →
inferno13–60.0830%17 Oct →
mirage10–130.0525%15 Oct →
ancient13–90.0144%15 Oct →
anubis3–130.0632%15 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0129%15 Oct →
inferno2–12-0.130%12 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0129%12 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0228%3 Oct →
inferno10–130.0835%30 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0026%28 Sept →
nuke6–90.0157%6 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.0121%3 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0120%3 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0032%3 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.0433%3 Aug →
dust27–130.0627%2 Aug →
inferno13–70.0829%28 Jul →
dust29–13-0.048%28 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0225%27 Jul →
mirage8–130.0731%26 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0244%26 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0220%26 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0532%17 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0539%17 Jul →
dust24–13-0.1036%4 Jul →
train13–3-0.0439%4 Jul →
overpass13–5-0.0421%14 May →
cache13–90.0033%14 May →
cache13–70.0122%6 May →
cache10–13-0.0525%5 May →
cache13–5-0.0228%5 May →
mirage13–9-0.0320%22 Apr →
anubis13–40.0520%22 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0511%22 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0316%13 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0217%31 Mar →
nuke10–130.0125%31 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0613%21 Mar →
ancient12–120.0422%10 Mar →
dust213–50.0430%10 Mar →
anubis13–60.0227%10 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0621%9 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.0632%3 Mar →
ancient11–130.0938%2 Mar →
dust22–9-0.080%24 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0520%24 Feb →
mirage7–50.0832%24 Feb →
inferno2–13-0.0532%24 Feb →
ancient13–60.0038%23 Feb →
inferno12–120.0350%23 Feb →
nuke16–120.0527%23 Feb →
ancient13–40.0629%23 Feb →
dust28–13-0.1033%23 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0527%22 Feb →
dust213–70.0345%22 Feb →
nuke10–130.0239%21 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0423%21 Feb →
dust213–70.0432%21 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0436%21 Feb →
dust213–8-0.0523%21 Feb →
mirage2–13-0.1117%21 Feb →
mirage13–70.0127%20 Feb →
dust26–13-0.0436%20 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0832%20 Feb →
ancient12–12-0.0320%20 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0741%16 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0320%15 Feb →
overpass13–60.1421%15 Feb →
nuke5–130.0426%15 Feb →
mirage13–110.0428%14 Feb →
mirage13–90.0826%14 Feb →
mirage9–130.0930%12 Feb →
inferno4–00.3743%12 Feb →
dust22–130.0246%12 Feb →
ancient12–120.0233%12 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0335%11 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.0419%11 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0620%11 Feb →
inferno13–90.1425%10 Feb →
mirage13–100.0521%10 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0332%10 Feb →
dust21–13-0.0721%10 Feb →
dust213–8-0.0316%9 Feb →
dust21–13-0.0145%9 Feb →
nuke10–130.0131%9 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0431%9 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0615%9 Feb →
inferno1–13-0.0632%8 Feb →
overpass8–13-0.0732%8 Feb →
dust212–12-0.0222%8 Feb →
anubis11–130.0430%7 Feb →
nuke13–16-0.0229%7 Feb →
anubis13–90.0831%6 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0120%4 Feb →
dust213–100.0022%4 Feb →
mirage6–130.0221%4 Feb →
dust212–12-0.0643%3 Feb →
mirage13–110.0331%3 Feb →
ancient9–130.0136%3 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.