andy

andy — CS2 Stats

NO76561198086201371[U:1:125935643]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,914Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,191 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,191 → 2,191
+7Tracked matches · now 1,914
0.0ppWin rate · 70.0% → 70.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 23 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 29,099 +2,215 2 Apr26 May · 9 days played
26,56929,099peak 29,0992 Apr26 May
Faceit ELO: 2,191 +0 29 Aug3 Sept · 3 observations
2,1912,191peak 2,19129 Aug3 Sept
29,099Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,191Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-01-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,191
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 309 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGandyFACEITLevel 10 · 2,191 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,191csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning63
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58357Last 10058%Win rateLLWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.3pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 651ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 1451 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility7.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.3
Utility7.3
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time594ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–4 · vertigo, 11 Aug
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 21 Apr
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 15 May
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 21 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2014670%0.01
ancientA1912763%0.01
anubisA1912763%0.01
mirageA169756%-0.01
nukeC104640%0.02
cacheS54180%-0.01
poseidon3030%-0.11
overpass21150%0.02
dust22020%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.26
eldorado110100%-0.13
debris1010%0.04
sanctum1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,807Matches
53%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
82.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8958%1.2416.6
Inferno6555%1.1616.2
Anubis5246%1.1417.0
Mirage2450%0.9714.8
Vertigo2040%1.1517.3
Train1771%1.1916.6
Nuke1354%1.1917.8
Dust21233%0.9516.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
574msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
12.56HE damage / grenade
12.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.5652% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–13-0.0214%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0125%22 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0126%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0313%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0117%22 Aug
ancient13–30.008%22 Aug
ancient13–70.0424%22 Aug
inferno13–70.0214%22 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0213%14 Aug
cache13–30.0217%14 Aug
anubis13–10.0724%14 Aug
mirage13–80.0115%14 Aug
poseidon7–9-0.0935%11 Aug
vertigo9–40.2617%11 Aug
nuke9–50.1820%11 Aug
eldorado9–3-0.136%4 Aug
poseidon5–9-0.1620%4 Aug
debris8–80.0421%4 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0124%1 Aug
inferno13–10.0321%1 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0412%1 Aug
ancient13–40.0420%1 Aug
cache13–5-0.0414%1 Aug
anubis13–60.0517%1 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0712%26 May
mirage13–110.0224%26 May
anubis4–13-0.0816%26 May
sanctum8–8-0.0721%22 May
poseidon7–9-0.0715%22 May
overpass9–30.1122%22 May
nuke4–9-0.0924%22 May
nuke8–130.0136%16 May
ancient13–60.0320%16 May
dust23–13-0.0120%16 May
anubis13–6-0.0211%16 May
inferno13–40.0824%15 May
nuke11–130.0012%15 May
ancient4–130.0317%15 May
mirage13–80.0724%15 May
ancient5–130.0125%15 May
cache13–40.0215%15 May
nuke8–80.0716%14 May
overpass8–8-0.0713%14 May
inferno9–60.0219%14 May
inferno7–90.0221%14 May
mirage16–140.0121%13 May
anubis7–130.0019%13 May
ancient9–13-0.0723%13 May
anubis15–150.0223%25 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0317%25 Apr
anubis13–50.1025%25 Apr
ancient10–130.0217%25 Apr
mirage13–60.0214%24 Apr
ancient7–130.0313%24 Apr
inferno13–30.018%24 Apr
nuke11–130.0426%24 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0513%24 Apr
ancient13–40.0520%21 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0339%21 Apr
ancient13–100.0215%19 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0631%19 Apr
inferno12–16-0.0318%11 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0213%11 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0412%2 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0033%2 Apr
inferno13–90.0332%2 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0312%2 Apr
anubis13–70.0035%2 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0120%1 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0217%1 Mar
ancient13–100.0126%1 Mar
inferno13–90.0627%21 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0124%21 Feb
ancient13–00.0522%21 Feb
anubis15–150.0115%21 Feb
anubis16–140.0123%18 Feb
inferno13–80.0514%18 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0118%11 Feb
inferno17–19-0.0218%9 Feb
ancient13–50.1023%9 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0323%8 Feb
inferno13–50.0316%8 Feb
anubis13–80.0710%8 Feb
ancient16–12-0.0115%8 Feb
mirage9–13-0.059%30 Jan
anubis13–8-0.0427%30 Jan
anubis13–80.0212%28 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0119%28 Jan
anubis10–130.0936%27 Jan
mirage16–130.0117%26 Jan
mirage5–13-0.059%24 Jan
nuke13–110.0518%24 Jan
inferno16–130.0218%24 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0619%24 Jan
mirage13–110.0321%23 Jan
anubis13–80.0420%23 Jan
inferno13–60.0918%23 Jan
dust27–13-0.0332%23 Jan
anubis13–40.0014%23 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0311%23 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →