R1m

R1m — CS2 Stats

UG76561198084801977[U:1:124536249]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,062Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,718Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,159Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36867 of 223451 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 989 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 23,159 → 23,159
0Faceit ELO · 989 → 989
+2Tracked matches · now 1,062
0.0ppWin rate · 58.6% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 28 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,159 -3,299 28 Jul17 Sept · 29 days played
20,31926,687peak 26,68728 Jul17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 989 +0 28 Aug17 Sept · 5 observations
989989peak 98928 Aug17 Sept
26,765Peak Premier in tracked matches
989Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-07-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 989
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,528 below peak (26,687)
  • +1,259 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,841 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.3%42.7%43.8%1.5% short
Shot accuracy12.0%11.2%12.0%meets
Kill/death ratio1.050.991.02above
Match win rate43.4%43.9%44.7%1.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGR1mFACEITLevel 4 · 989 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER23,159 · Pink bandPEAK ELO989csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning59
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateWLLWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility5.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time595ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−4.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 2 Aug
57%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · inferno, 31 Jul
328msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 31 Jul
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 57% over 23nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25121348%-0.01
ancientA23131057%-0.00
anubisB168850%-0.02
dust2B158753%-0.00
infernoC104640%0.03
nukeD62433%-0.01
cache42250%-0.00
office1010%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,758Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,867Matches
43.4%Match win rate
42.3%Headshot %
12.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
7,239MVPs
2,700Hours (in match)
1,863Bombs planted
897Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,755
AWP15,330
MP71,611
SSG 081,579
SG 5531,293

Lifetime map wins

18,474dust2
2,381inferno
1,151nuke
821vertigo
449train
205safehouse
159italy
122lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

295Matches
46%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
73.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9444%0.9114.2
Ancient4637%0.9715.6
Dust24344%1.0314.2
Anubis2952%1.0114.4
Inferno2846%0.9515.6
Nuke1362%0.8714.5
Train978%1.2215.8
Cache560%0.9812.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
589msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
5.81HE damage / grenade
17.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4438% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.0326%17 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0620%17 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0426%16 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0419%15 Sept
dust213–90.0126%15 Sept
ancient13–00.089%15 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0318%13 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0119%13 Sept
mirage9–20.1219%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0419%12 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0121%12 Sept
dust216–130.0113%11 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0130%8 Sept
inferno13–100.0335%8 Sept
dust25–13-0.0622%8 Sept
ancient13–100.0022%8 Sept
nuke13–60.0419%8 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0222%8 Sept
ancient5–130.0725%8 Sept
nuke15–15-0.0112%7 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0029%6 Sept
mirage13–110.0010%6 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0015%6 Sept
mirage13–60.0314%6 Sept
anubis5–130.0022%6 Sept
dust24–13-0.076%6 Sept
dust212–16-0.0323%4 Sept
anubis13–80.0517%4 Sept
mirage13–70.0431%4 Sept
ancient8–130.0315%3 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0230%3 Sept
ancient10–130.0331%3 Sept
ancient11–13-0.079%3 Sept
dust213–11-0.0116%31 Aug
ancient13–30.0315%30 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0321%30 Aug
ancient9–13-0.088%29 Aug
dust213–40.0428%28 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0220%27 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0623%26 Aug
ancient13–80.039%26 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0425%26 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0024%25 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0122%25 Aug
dust213–70.0317%25 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0155%25 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0113%25 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0713%25 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0418%25 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0314%25 Aug
dust213–9-0.0437%25 Aug
anubis6–13-0.1221%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0917%25 Aug
anubis13–4-0.026%24 Aug
dust214–16-0.0115%24 Aug
cache8–13-0.057%23 Aug
cache13–50.0214%23 Aug
inferno5–130.0211%23 Aug
anubis13–20.0720%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0128%19 Aug
ancient13–30.028%19 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0811%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0421%12 Aug
anubis13–80.0415%10 Aug
cache13–90.0415%10 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0211%10 Aug
nuke2–13-0.044%10 Aug
dust24–13-0.0519%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0614%9 Aug
cache9–13-0.0118%9 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0523%9 Aug
ancient8–130.0129%9 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0317%9 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0111%9 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0124%9 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0213%9 Aug
inferno11–130.1430%4 Aug
office12–120.0925%3 Aug
mirage6–130.0232%3 Aug
dust210–13-0.0330%2 Aug
dust211–130.0627%2 Aug
mirage10–130.0431%2 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0813%2 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0223%2 Aug
ancient13–100.0523%2 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0838%2 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0127%2 Aug
mirage16–140.1423%2 Aug
inferno13–40.1422%2 Aug
anubis4–130.0324%2 Aug
mirage10–130.0035%1 Aug
dust213–60.0623%1 Aug
inferno22–20-0.0123%1 Aug
inferno8–130.0157%31 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0024%31 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0015%30 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0520%29 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0120%29 Jul
anubis13–90.0329%29 Jul
dust213–60.0839%28 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →