𝖍𝖔𝖆𝖝 — CS2 Stats

AU76561198083572241[U:1:123306513]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,160Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since

6,649Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating17,580Purple band · top ~18.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#113676 of 251497 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,580 +1,120 29 Aug – 12 Oct · 22 days played

19,572Peak Premier in tracked matches

22Days played since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

879 below peak (18,459)
+2,478 over 30 days · improving
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,420 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	93	—	—
Win rate	54%	—	—
K/D	0.89	—	—
Headshot %	39%	—	—

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Purple band median	Pink band median	vs Pink band
Headshot rate	38.2%	44.3%	46.9%	8.8% short
Shot accuracy	11.9%	11.9%	13.0%	1.1% short
Kill/death ratio	0.90	1.03	1.08	0.18 short
Match win rate	37.0%	45.2%	46.7%	9.7% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning62

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateWLLWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 463ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 462ms

Last 20

11–8–1 · 55% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 464ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.2

Utility5.1

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 48% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning6.2

Utility5.1

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels6.3

Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time490ms−31ms

first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 490ms

Headshot accuracy16.0%−0.9%

first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 20 Sept →

41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · anubis, 8 Oct →

375msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · cache, 30 Aug →

13–2Biggest win · dust2, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

14–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9cacheWeakest map · 36% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	24	14–10	58%	-0.01
mirage	A	21	12–9	57%	-0.01
cache	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.02
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.01
anubis	S	12	8–4	67%	0.00
nuke	S	9	7–2	78%	0.03
inferno	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

127,781Lifetime kills

0.90K/D

6,730Matches

37.0%Match win rate

38.2%Headshot %

11.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Purple band

10,465MVPs

2,659Hours (in match)

6,919Bombs planted

1,206Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,783

AWP32,698

M4A4 / M4A1-S17,357

P2000 / USP-S5,391

Desert Eagle4,793

Tec-93,861

Glock-183,826

FAMAS2,808

Five-SeveN2,517

P2502,406

Lifetime map wins

15,089dust2

8,893inferno

3,324cbble

2,552nuke

1,178train

589vertigo

31office

31dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

57Matches

51%Win rate

0.91Avg K/D

69.6ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

10%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	6	50%	0.66	10.5
Inferno	3	100%	1.12	13.0
Dust2	3	0%	0.72	11.7
Anubis	2	50%	0.70	10.5
Nuke	2	50%	0.95	13.0
Ancient	1	0%	0.53	9.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy

36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.2%Spray accuracy

80.7%Counter-strafing

7.3°Preaim

483msReaction time

62.9%T opening success

47.9%CT opening success

0.68Enemies flashed / flash

2.8%Flash assists

10.93HE damage / grenade

3.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.2908 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–10	-0.04	32%	12 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.03	13%	12 Oct →
cache	6–13	0.02	14%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.01	14%	12 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.04	33%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.04	22%	12 Oct →
anubis	9–13	0.05	12%	12 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	8%	12 Oct →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	10%	12 Oct →
cache	0–13	-0.06	4%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–7	0.08	22%	10 Oct →
mirage	15–15	0.07	19%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.04	10%	10 Oct →
nuke	4–0	0.04	8%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.04	12%	10 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	14%	10 Oct →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	9%	8 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.05	17%	8 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.07	23%	8 Oct →
anubis	13–6	0.01	41%	8 Oct →
cache	5–13	-0.09	22%	8 Oct →
nuke	13–3	0.12	13%	8 Oct →
mirage	13–9	0.02	10%	7 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	10%	7 Oct →
nuke	13–3	0.09	14%	6 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	23%	6 Oct →
ancient	16–12	0.04	10%	6 Oct →
cache	4–13	-0.05	20%	6 Oct →
ancient	8–13	-0.07	13%	6 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	13%	6 Oct →
anubis	13–11	0.00	12%	6 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	14%	6 Oct →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	14%	6 Oct →
mirage	9–13	0.05	19%	6 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	9%	5 Oct →
inferno	11–13	0.03	20%	5 Oct →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	12%	5 Oct →
mirage	9–13	0.02	29%	5 Oct →
mirage	16–14	0.01	31%	5 Oct →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	12%	5 Oct →
cache	8–13	-0.02	15%	5 Oct →
mirage	3–13	-0.12	17%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.11	26%	5 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.02	13%	5 Oct →
anubis	13–10	0.01	18%	5 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	24%	5 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	14%	5 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	2%	4 Oct →
anubis	13–11	0.02	10%	4 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	17%	4 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.00	15%	4 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	12%	4 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.10	6%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	3%	3 Oct →
dust2	3–2	0.00	14%	3 Oct →
cache	7–13	-0.07	14%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.02	19%	3 Oct →
anubis	13–3	0.05	10%	3 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	12%	3 Oct →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	8%	1 Oct →
anubis	13–4	0.02	15%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.01	27%	28 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	5%	28 Sept →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	12%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.02	12%	28 Sept →
cache	13–4	-0.05	24%	26 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.01	17%	25 Sept →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	21%	25 Sept →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	10%	21 Sept →
anubis	13–7	-0.06	4%	20 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.08	20%	20 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.14	10%	20 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.01	16%	20 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	20%	20 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	15%	19 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	19%	19 Sept →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	8%	19 Sept →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	13%	19 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	16%	19 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.01	20%	19 Sept →
cache	10–1	0.03	20%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	11%	19 Sept →
nuke	7–13	0.03	39%	19 Sept →
cache	1–13	-0.10	11%	19 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	12%	13 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.08	9%	13 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	13%	5 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	0%	4 Sept →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	13%	1 Sept →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	14%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.13	37%	30 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	18%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	8%	30 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	23%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	32%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	21%	30 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	13%	30 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.05	28%	30 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	15%	29 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.06	27%	29 Aug →