Bath

Bath — CS2 Stats

76561198401033117[U:1:440767389]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,195Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,228Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64445 of 251515 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,017 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−275Premier CS Rating · 21,503 → 21,228

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,228 -1,209 7 Sept – 14 Oct · 30 days played
20,19622,800peak 22,8007 Sept14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,017 +0 9 Sept – 5 Oct · 4 observations
1,0171,017peak 1,0179 Sept5 Oct
23,094Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,017Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-09-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,017
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 34 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,572 below peak (22,800)
  • +1,018 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,772 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBathFACEITLevel 7 · 1,017 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,228 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,017csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning59
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateWLLWTWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.9
Utility6.5
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time523ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 530ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 15 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 3 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 9 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10mirageWeakest map · 42% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2611–1542%0.01
dust2A1911–858%0.01
ancientC167–944%0.00
anubisS107–370%0.03
nukeS107–370%0.05
infernoA95–456%0.02
cacheC73–443%0.04
train—20–20%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 26). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

85Matches
52%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
74.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21942%1.0714.6
Ancient1856%1.2416.2
Mirage1553%1.1615.0
Inferno1450%1.0715.1
Nuke989%1.3116.2
Anubis729%0.8013.4
Train10%0.508.0
Overpass10%1.4131.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
521msReaction time
39.1%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
8.27HE damage / grenade
15.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.0625% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–100.0323%14 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0414%14 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0230%13 Oct →
inferno13–50.1219%13 Oct →
train12–12-0.0221%13 Oct →
mirage13–100.0927%13 Oct →
dust213–90.0831%13 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0313%13 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0622%12 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0312%12 Oct →
cache9–130.0412%11 Oct →
nuke13–80.1017%11 Oct →
mirage13–100.0318%11 Oct →
inferno13–70.0126%11 Oct →
ancient16–120.0325%11 Oct →
dust216–130.0319%10 Oct →
train5–130.0124%10 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0421%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0324%10 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0223%9 Oct →
ancient13–50.0725%9 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0117%8 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0812%8 Oct →
dust213–20.0117%8 Oct →
ancient14–160.0026%7 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0520%7 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0716%7 Oct →
cache15–150.0312%6 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0521%6 Oct →
nuke13–30.0329%6 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0111%6 Oct →
inferno13–70.1220%6 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0010%5 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0015%5 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0115%5 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0111%5 Oct →
ancient13–110.0115%5 Oct →
anubis13–100.0514%5 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0621%5 Oct →
mirage13–110.0618%5 Oct →
cache12–160.0624%4 Oct →
mirage10–130.0317%4 Oct →
nuke13–110.0336%4 Oct →
mirage16–130.0614%3 Oct →
vertigo12–120.0824%3 Oct →
dust213–30.0243%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.1116%2 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0331%2 Oct →
mirage13–20.0517%1 Oct →
anubis13–40.0123%1 Oct →
inferno6–130.0018%1 Oct →
dust213–40.039%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0418%30 Sept →
dust213–80.037%29 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0318%22 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0127%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.0120%22 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0526%21 Sept →
mirage10–130.0317%20 Sept →
cache13–20.0020%20 Sept →
dust213–60.0420%20 Sept →
nuke10–130.0318%19 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0014%19 Sept →
anubis13–30.1322%18 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0217%17 Sept →
anubis13–60.0114%16 Sept →
inferno16–130.0116%16 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.045%16 Sept →
dust216–120.0218%15 Sept →
nuke13–50.0514%15 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0017%15 Sept →
cache8–130.0010%15 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0122%15 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.049%15 Sept →
ancient15–150.0018%15 Sept →
anubis13–30.1423%15 Sept →
nuke10–130.0616%14 Sept →
mirage13–110.099%14 Sept →
mirage11–130.0321%14 Sept →
nuke9–130.1210%14 Sept →
nuke13–20.0520%14 Sept →
mirage9–130.0335%14 Sept →
ancient13–60.0414%13 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0317%13 Sept →
dust210–130.0825%13 Sept →
dust213–100.0916%13 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0012%11 Sept →
ancient13–50.0512%11 Sept →
cache13–20.1017%11 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0113%10 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0714%9 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0016%9 Sept →
inferno8–130.0617%9 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0317%8 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0421%8 Sept →
dust214–160.0317%8 Sept →
nuke13–60.0823%8 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0311%8 Sept →
anubis13–70.038%7 Sept →
cache13–70.0521%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.