stinx — CS2 Stats

76561198082471767[U:1:122206039]

2,727Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,527 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning61

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–35–3Last 10062%Win rateWWWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression7.3

Utility4.6

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning6.1

Utility4.6

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time510ms−27ms

first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms

Headshot accuracy22.9%−2.2%

first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — vertigo 13–1

13–0Biggest win — overpass

6Longest win streak

W4Current streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

20Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	28	18–10	64%	0.02
inferno	C	17	7–10	41%	0.02
anubis	S	14	11–3	79%	0.01
mirage	S	10	7–3	70%	0.03
overpass	S	9	7–2	78%	0.03
nuke	C	8	3–5	38%	0.01
ancient	B	8	4–4	50%	0.01
cache	S	5	4–1	80%	0.05
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,098Matches

57%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

81.0ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	379	54%	1.20	16.4
Anubis	371	58%	1.24	16.7
Mirage	202	51%	1.13	15.8
Inferno	193	50%	1.19	16.7
Nuke	175	46%	1.18	17.1
Ancient	168	52%	1.13	16.0
Vertigo	100	57%	1.19	17.5
Overpass	89	53%	1.40	17.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy

38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.5%Spray accuracy

82.9%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

512msReaction time

35.1%T opening success

46.6%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

12.2%Flash assists

8.58HE damage / grenade

5.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4119 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.1284% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–5	0.01	48%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.02	13%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	13%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	21%	22 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.03	27%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.12	29%	18 Aug →
vertigo	13–1	0.17	20%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	13%	17 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.00	16%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	16%	9 Aug →
cache	17–19	0.07	27%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.08	24%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.06	18%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.08	22%	28 Jul →
dust2	20–22	-0.02	9%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.07	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.08	29%	25 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	19%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.09	26%	25 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	39%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.03	10%	23 Jul →
dust2	17–19	-0.01	23%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.01	45%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.02	23%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	28%	13 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	29%	12 Jul →
cache	19–17	0.00	10%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.09	29%	4 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	14%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	37%	30 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.00	19%	30 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.01	26%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.00	17%	30 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	14%	30 Jun →
overpass	13–0	0.00	50%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–1	0.07	8%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.06	21%	28 Jun →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	23%	28 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.09	35%	23 Jun →
dust2	15–15	0.04	23%	23 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	17%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.00	24%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.02	9%	20 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	24%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.06	13%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–16	-0.06	19%	20 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.12	30%	20 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	38%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	21%	16 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.03	17%	14 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.03	33%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.03	21%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.01	8%	13 Jun →
anubis	13–1	-0.02	40%	1 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	33%	1 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.01	32%	1 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.01	20%	31 May →
nuke	13–9	0.02	15%	31 May →
ancient	12–16	0.04	32%	31 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	25%	28 May →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	16%	25 May →
overpass	2–13	-0.07	24%	25 May →
ancient	14–16	-0.04	27%	25 May →
overpass	7–13	-0.07	25%	24 May →
ancient	13–2	0.06	26%	24 May →
dust2	13–8	0.02	23%	24 May →
mirage	11–13	0.05	28%	24 May →
nuke	13–7	0.09	37%	24 May →
ancient	16–12	0.05	23%	24 May →
overpass	13–4	0.04	27%	24 May →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	41%	24 May →
dust2	13–8	0.17	31%	23 May →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	30%	23 May →
ancient	15–15	0.02	22%	23 May →
mirage	13–7	0.04	23%	21 May →
inferno	13–4	0.07	37%	19 May →
dust2	16–12	0.00	18%	19 May →
mirage	13–3	0.10	19%	16 May →
nuke	13–16	-0.05	26%	14 May →
ancient	13–6	0.06	22%	10 May →
mirage	13–5	0.02	13%	10 May →
dust2	16–14	0.04	32%	10 May →
overpass	13–4	0.07	15%	5 May →
dust2	13–3	0.04	17%	5 May →
mirage	19–15	0.03	34%	20 Apr →
inferno	16–19	0.03	21%	19 Apr →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	14%	19 Apr →
inferno	13–10	0.06	35%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.13	17%	19 Apr →
inferno	6–13	0.06	18%	13 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.03	19%	13 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	12%	13 Apr →
anubis	5–13	0.01	25%	13 Apr →
inferno	13–16	0.14	32%	12 Apr →
overpass	13–10	0.06	26%	10 Apr →
overpass	13–9	0.10	26%	8 Apr →
inferno	10–13	0.11	22%	6 Apr →
nuke	10–13	0.08	27%	6 Apr →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	33%	6 Apr →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	36%	1 Mar →