rondo jeremy

rondo jeremy — CS2 Stats

HK76561198080665462[U:1:120399734]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,496Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,394Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#12261 of 260001 tracked
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,181 +1,406 19 Nov – 8 Apr · 15 days played
24,21427,115peak 27,11519 Nov8 Apr
27,333Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,306Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2025-11-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,306
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 194 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrondo jeremyPEAK ELO2,306csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning63
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateLWWWLTWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.8pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.3
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.6

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time629ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 16–14 · nuke, 8 Aug →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · overpass, 22 Nov →
430msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 7 Mar →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 24 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 88% over 8cacheWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2413–1154%0.02
ancientD164–1225%0.00
nukeC156–940%0.02
anubisC104–640%0.02
infernoS87–188%0.02
cacheD61–517%-0.01
trainS64–267%0.02
overpassS64–267%0.04
dust2C52–340%0.00
office—21–150%0.08
vertigo—10–10%0.03
warden—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

222,905Lifetime kills
1.02K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
12,826Matches
68.2%Match win rate · Top 1% of tracked players
52.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
24,188MVPs
4,394Hours (in match)
8,290Bombs planted
3,862Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4773,128
AWP27,285
SG 5533,605
Knife2,876
SSG 082,859
P2502,821

Lifetime map wins

13,856inferno
8,885dust2
6,353nuke
3,743train
1,011vertigo
668cbble
274office
220lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,733Matches
52%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
83.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
20Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27555%1.2317.4
Anubis17848%1.1717.2
Ancient15047%1.1416.8
Nuke12945%1.1918.5
Train8060%1.3418.2
Inferno6754%1.1216.1
Dust25052%1.1115.5
Overpass2857%1.3018.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.8%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
630msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
8.63HE damage / grenade
11.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5052% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0814%16 Sept →
mirage13–80.0620%10 Sept →
nuke16–140.1518%8 Aug →
inferno13–80.0432%8 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0611%19 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0916%10 Jul →
cache13–50.0423%29 Apr →
cache5–13-0.0116%29 Apr →
cache1–13-0.0913%29 Apr →
cache12–120.1023%29 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0515%26 Apr →
cache7–13-0.0328%26 Apr →
mirage13–2-0.0039%26 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0027%24 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0123%22 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0813%21 Apr →
mirage13–60.0819%13 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0620%8 Apr →
mirage11–130.1028%1 Apr →
anubis13–80.0620%1 Apr →
nuke4–130.0424%1 Apr →
mirage13–110.0719%1 Apr →
mirage13–50.0023%27 Mar →
vertigo7–130.0323%26 Mar →
dust29–130.0024%26 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.0132%26 Mar →
nuke13–16-0.0120%25 Mar →
mirage16–140.0414%25 Mar →
mirage16–12-0.0121%25 Mar →
nuke13–80.0014%25 Mar →
mirage14–160.0624%24 Mar →
nuke13–50.0132%23 Mar →
nuke16–120.1019%23 Mar →
inferno16–13-0.0429%23 Mar →
mirage13–40.0944%23 Mar →
ancient10–130.0116%21 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0114%14 Mar →
nuke16–19-0.0417%14 Mar →
office9–130.0819%12 Mar →
ancient8–130.0431%12 Mar →
mirage7–130.0117%12 Mar →
nuke20–22-0.038%9 Mar →
anubis5–130.0319%8 Mar →
nuke4–130.0514%7 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.0319%3 Mar →
train13–9-0.0225%3 Mar →
ancient1–13-0.0617%15 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.0117%15 Feb →
nuke4–13-0.0221%14 Feb →
mirage10–130.0524%14 Feb →
ancient8–130.0133%10 Feb →
overpass4–13-0.0315%10 Feb →
nuke13–110.0618%10 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0818%9 Feb →
nuke13–90.0419%9 Feb →
inferno13–90.0913%5 Feb →
warden4–130.0333%5 Feb →
mirage13–80.0315%5 Feb →
ancient10–130.0428%5 Feb →
anubis16–140.0212%5 Feb →
ancient13–40.023%4 Feb →
overpass13–90.0713%4 Feb →
anubis13–50.0810%4 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0210%4 Feb →
overpass13–30.1031%4 Feb →
anubis9–13-0.0215%3 Feb →
overpass13–110.0219%3 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.026%3 Feb →
inferno13–100.0315%2 Feb →
dust213–80.0512%2 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0111%30 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0213%28 Jan →
anubis13–70.1123%28 Jan →
mirage13–30.1031%26 Jan →
inferno13–10.0716%24 Jan →
nuke11–130.0014%24 Jan →
ancient5–13-0.0410%18 Jan →
overpass5–130.0821%17 Jan →
anubis3–13-0.0424%17 Jan →
mirage8–130.0120%15 Jan →
train13–80.1017%27 Dec →
ancient2–130.0315%21 Dec →
office8–00.0818%12 Dec →
ancient9–130.0123%11 Dec →
train19–150.0811%6 Dec →
dust213–40.1026%6 Dec →
mirage13–60.0119%5 Dec →
mirage15–150.005%1 Dec →
ancient13–60.0515%1 Dec →
mirage13–90.0816%29 Nov →
train8–13-0.0323%29 Nov →
train13–11-0.0210%27 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0022%27 Nov →
ancient13–60.027%27 Nov →
inferno13–100.0423%22 Nov →
overpass13–9-0.0048%22 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0915%21 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.0314%20 Nov →
train15–150.0218%19 Nov →
nuke9–130.0219%19 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.