Felipe

Felipe — CS2 Stats

76561198080486238[U:1:120220510]Steam profile ↗

655Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,191Purple band · top ~15.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,283 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,191 -1,694 14 Feb – 10 Oct · 9 days played
16,75020,815peak 20,81514 Feb10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,283 +0 30 Aug – 22 Sept · 3 observations
1,2831,283peak 1,28330 Aug22 Sept
20,815Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,283Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-02-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,283
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 68 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,624 below peak (20,815)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,809 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFelipeFACEITLevel 6 · 1,283 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,191 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,283csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning49
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–40–10Last 10050%Win rateWWWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +5.8pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility3.2
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.9
Utility3.2
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time607ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 680ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 10 Oct →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · train, 10 Apr →
453msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · anubis, 5 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 26% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA4125–1661%-0.03
dust2D195–1426%-0.04
infernoS96–367%-0.02
cacheC94–544%-0.06
nukeB63–350%-0.04
ancientA53–260%-0.03
anubis—41–325%-0.05
train—21–150%-0.02
office—20–20%-0.03
italy—21–150%-0.03
vertigo—11–0100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

392Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
67.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1765%0.9013.3
Ancient1060%0.7513.3
Dust2875%1.1514.9
Inferno650%1.0216.5
Nuke650%0.7211.7
Overpass540%0.7711.6
Train250%1.0517.0
Anubis10%0.9415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
29.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
603msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
25.4%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
12.28HE damage / grenade
1.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3591 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.0402% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0016%10 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0328%10 Oct →
inferno13–30.0925%10 Oct →
nuke13–20.0013%10 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0419%5 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0020%5 Oct →
cache7–13-0.1018%5 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0819%1 Oct →
dust213–60.0329%1 Oct →
inferno13–60.0115%27 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0618%27 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0629%27 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0411%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0015%25 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0611%25 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0515%25 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0610%25 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0014%23 Sept →
inferno13–20.0114%23 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.028%23 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.025%23 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0925%5 Sept →
mirage9–130.0118%5 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0524%5 Sept →
dust24–13-0.1130%5 Sept →
dust213–8-0.059%19 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0413%19 Jul →
dust213–70.0822%18 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0322%18 Jul →
mirage13–90.0116%15 Jul →
cache14–16-0.0112%12 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0316%12 May →
cache13–8-0.0312%12 May →
cache13–11-0.0712%12 May →
cache13–7-0.0724%11 May →
cache13–7-0.0510%11 May →
cache9–13-0.0617%11 May →
mirage3–13-0.0921%11 May →
mirage13–40.0823%15 Apr →
mirage12–12-0.0922%15 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0320%15 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0817%10 Apr →
train10–13-0.0246%10 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0429%10 Apr →
nuke12–12-0.0316%10 Apr →
mirage12–12-0.0415%10 Apr →
vertigo13–4-0.0513%10 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0312%10 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.1115%10 Apr →
mirage13–40.0228%10 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0810%10 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0612%10 Mar →
inferno12–12-0.0525%10 Mar →
ancient8–130.0023%5 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0613%5 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0320%2 Mar →
dust215–15-0.0725%1 Mar →
anubis16–14-0.0310%1 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0321%1 Mar →
dust23–13-0.0928%28 Feb →
dust29–13-0.086%28 Feb →
office12–12-0.0121%28 Feb →
italy11–13-0.0119%28 Feb →
mirage13–70.0116%27 Feb →
mirage13–40.0428%27 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.069%27 Feb →
mirage13–30.0230%27 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0513%27 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0510%22 Feb →
dust23–13-0.099%22 Feb →
ancient16–13-0.0414%21 Feb →
mirage13–50.0313%21 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0812%21 Feb →
inferno13–5-0.0111%21 Feb →
ancient13–80.0034%21 Feb →
dust24–13-0.0815%21 Feb →
mirage12–12-0.0722%18 Feb →
mirage8–1-0.030%18 Feb →
mirage11–130.0027%18 Feb →
mirage13–2-0.0014%18 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0617%17 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0422%17 Feb →
italy13–8-0.0628%17 Feb →
office9–13-0.0617%17 Feb →
mirage16–12-0.0315%16 Feb →
dust213–16-0.0537%14 Feb →
dust213–60.0413%14 Feb →
mirage13–40.0526%14 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.087%14 Feb →
inferno15–15-0.0417%14 Feb →
dust24–130.0827%14 Feb →
mirage13–100.016%11 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0531%11 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.0613%11 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0320%10 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0815%10 Feb →
train13–11-0.0220%10 Feb →
mirage13–5-0.0324%10 Feb →
mirage16–13-0.0415%10 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.096%10 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.