asti ♱

asti ♱ — CS2 Stats

76561198077611413[U:1:117345685]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,039Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,550Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingClutch Specialist
CSDB Leaderboard#25580 of 222200 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,020 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 10 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,393 +2,807 10 Jan26 Jun · 25 days played
21,58626,755peak 26,75510 Jan26 Jun
26,845Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,020Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-01-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,020
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 480 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate60.6%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy16.9%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.331.071.09above
Match win rate43.1%46.9%48.4%5.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGasti ♱FACEITLevel 9 · 2,020 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,020csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning46
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55441Last 10055%Win rateLLWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch5.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.6
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time606ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%+5.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 5 Feb
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–3 · dust2, 6 Sept
430msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 6 Feb
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 3 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 14infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2291341%-0.01
nukeA1710759%0.00
dust2S1410471%-0.02
anubisA148657%-0.01
mirageB115645%-0.01
overpassS107370%-0.03
cacheB63350%-0.00
infernoC52340%-0.00
alpine110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

267,738Lifetime kills
1.33K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
7,077Matches
43.1%Match win rate
60.6%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
15,547MVPs
4,826Hours (in match)
6,089Bombs planted
2,231Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47142,973
AWP13,431
FAMAS6,044
P904,130

Lifetime map wins

9,246inferno
7,856nuke
7,359dust2
3,472vertigo
2,544cbble
1,656train
314office
224italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,437Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
71.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis11155%0.9414.5
Ancient9650%0.9213.8
Nuke9459%1.0214.8
Mirage8138%0.8813.0
Dust26445%0.9413.8
Overpass4358%0.9613.3
Vertigo4245%0.8413.9
Inferno838%0.6910.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
597msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
11.62HE damage / grenade
2.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.9902 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8413% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust21–3-0.0950%6 Sept
nuke5–130.0320%6 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0331%6 Sept
anubis7–0-0.0113%6 Sept
cache8–130.0117%17 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0515%3 Aug
inferno13–110.0123%3 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0515%26 Jun
anubis11–13-0.048%26 Jun
ancient13–110.0316%26 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0121%26 Jun
ancient10–130.0423%26 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0636%15 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0127%15 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0229%12 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0124%12 Jun
anubis10–130.0623%12 Jun
overpass8–13-0.078%12 Jun
overpass13–6-0.0819%12 Jun
mirage2–80.0129%12 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0226%11 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0312%9 Jun
ancient13–40.0215%9 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0316%7 Jun
dust213–9-0.0521%7 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0326%5 Jun
cache7–13-0.0126%5 Jun
ancient13–110.0312%5 Jun
overpass13–60.0519%5 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0224%5 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0417%3 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0815%3 Jun
nuke13–1-0.0635%3 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0222%3 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0126%1 Jun
mirage8–130.0329%30 May
anubis13–8-0.036%30 May
overpass13–110.0124%25 May
nuke13–50.0828%25 May
dust28–13-0.0047%25 May
mirage11–130.0115%25 May
inferno14–160.0223%23 May
cache13–50.0022%1 May
dust213–50.0328%1 May
mirage13–6-0.0523%1 May
alpine13–10.0129%1 May
cache5–13-0.0233%30 Apr
cache13–7-0.0222%30 Apr
cache13–90.0126%29 Apr
overpass13–90.0115%17 Apr
dust213–40.0535%3 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0118%29 Mar
dust213–10-0.0127%18 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0216%18 Mar
anubis13–50.0625%18 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0921%15 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0413%15 Mar
overpass13–90.0313%15 Mar
nuke13–40.0619%13 Mar
overpass16–13-0.0323%13 Mar
dust213–8-0.0216%9 Mar
nuke13–11-0.019%9 Mar
overpass3–13-0.0821%9 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0120%1 Mar
anubis13–40.0222%1 Mar
ancient13–60.0216%1 Mar
dust213–9-0.0419%26 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0222%26 Feb
anubis6–130.0019%25 Feb
ancient13–100.1319%25 Feb
inferno13–8-0.088%25 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0411%24 Feb
ancient10–130.0022%22 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0414%22 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0310%20 Feb
mirage13–110.0420%20 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0721%20 Feb
dust213–10-0.1020%20 Feb
dust29–13-0.0521%19 Feb
nuke13–90.0011%14 Feb
mirage13–50.0316%14 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0321%11 Feb
inferno4–130.0415%11 Feb
inferno14–16-0.019%10 Feb
dust213–100.0017%10 Feb
dust213–80.0314%10 Feb
ancient10–130.027%6 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0110%6 Feb
ancient13–5-0.0114%6 Feb
nuke13–10.048%6 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0619%6 Feb
mirage13–110.0217%6 Feb
dust213–8-0.0316%5 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0621%5 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0115%5 Feb
nuke13–20.1419%5 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0012%4 Feb
dust211–13-0.0015%4 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0415%10 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0530%10 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →