Mot1ve

Mot1ve — CS2 Stats

DE76561198055598390[U:1:95332662]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,297Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,252Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35864 of 221920 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 21 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,252 +3,147 21 Jul15 Sept · 28 days played
19,44423,690peak 23,69021 Jul15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,125 +0 31 Aug12 Sept · 4 observations
2,1252,125peak 2,12531 Aug12 Sept
24,185Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,125Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-07-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,125
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 375 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 438 below peak (23,690)
  • +1,323 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,748 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMot1vePREMIER23,252 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,125csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning61
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateTWWLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −10.4pp headshot accuracy · −70ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.1
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time512ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+4.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 3 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–3 · dust2, 6 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 31 Aug
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 20 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
139In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B25121348%0.00
infernoA2314961%0.02
ancientA1911858%0.01
anubisC104640%0.02
cacheA106460%0.02
mirageS64267%0.01
nukeD51420%0.01
eldorado110100%-0.04
debris1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,859Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
66.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis14451%0.9213.6
Ancient14044%0.9513.8
Nuke11050%1.0414.0
Mirage8151%0.9712.9
Dust25754%0.8914.1
Overpass4667%0.9813.6
Vertigo3543%0.9513.6
Inferno1164%0.9414.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
513msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
9.14HE damage / grenade
13.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9179% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust215–15-0.0321%15 Sept
anubis13–40.0619%15 Sept
mirage13–100.0723%14 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0327%14 Sept
dust210–130.047%14 Sept
dust213–11-0.0111%14 Sept
inferno8–20.0720%14 Sept
dust213–90.0324%14 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0722%14 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0224%8 Sept
dust21–30.02100%6 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0038%6 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0119%6 Sept
anubis7–00.1147%6 Sept
dust213–5-0.0218%5 Sept
inferno13–110.1116%5 Sept
dust213–50.0612%5 Sept
dust211–130.0323%5 Sept
dust211–13-0.0516%4 Sept
cache13–50.1413%3 Sept
cache11–13-0.0118%2 Sept
ancient13–20.0821%2 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0020%2 Sept
dust214–160.0421%1 Sept
ancient13–70.1114%31 Aug
inferno13–110.0415%31 Aug
nuke16–120.0012%31 Aug
dust28–13-0.0516%31 Aug
cache13–90.0019%29 Aug
mirage11–130.0115%23 Aug
inferno13–30.0821%23 Aug
inferno9–70.0017%22 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0517%22 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0713%21 Aug
inferno13–00.0346%20 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0412%20 Aug
dust26–13-0.0520%20 Aug
inferno6–130.0317%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.0018%19 Aug
mirage11–130.0113%19 Aug
dust215–15-0.0221%18 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0018%18 Aug
anubis10–13-0.048%18 Aug
inferno13–60.0416%18 Aug
dust213–60.0220%18 Aug
dust215–15-0.0138%18 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0312%18 Aug
ancient9–130.0310%18 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0018%18 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0319%18 Aug
nuke9–130.0110%18 Aug
cache13–90.0418%17 Aug
inferno13–80.0125%17 Aug
ancient13–90.0315%17 Aug
dust216–130.0424%17 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0815%17 Aug
cache13–11-0.0113%17 Aug
inferno13–50.1124%17 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0221%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0216%11 Aug
dust213–40.0313%11 Aug
dust213–90.0122%11 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0416%11 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0713%11 Aug
cache7–130.0315%8 Aug
anubis13–110.0314%8 Aug
dust213–50.0729%7 Aug
mirage13–110.007%6 Aug
cache6–13-0.038%6 Aug
nuke8–130.0820%6 Aug
ancient16–140.0224%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0119%5 Aug
dust26–13-0.0220%5 Aug
dust22–13-0.068%5 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0514%5 Aug
ancient13–50.0322%3 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0119%3 Aug
cache13–9-0.0124%3 Aug
ancient16–120.0519%3 Aug
dust213–9-0.0111%3 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0223%3 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0111%3 Aug
inferno13–110.0516%3 Aug
anubis9–130.0316%3 Aug
inferno13–30.1017%3 Aug
ancient13–50.0613%3 Aug
inferno9–130.0615%3 Aug
dust213–10-0.0010%3 Aug
ancient10–130.0419%1 Aug
cache13–40.0918%1 Aug
ancient10–130.0218%1 Aug
anubis10–130.0211%30 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0216%26 Jul
eldorado9–6-0.0420%25 Jul
debris4–9-0.1231%25 Jul
cache9–13-0.0514%24 Jul
inferno13–1-0.0333%21 Jul
dust211–13-0.0631%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0610%21 Jul
anubis10–13-0.016%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →