origoflix YT

origoflix YT — CS2 Stats

SE76561198077317224[U:1:117051496]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,519Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,898Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,528 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,519 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 26 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

1,528Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-02-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,528
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 3 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-22
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-22

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,280), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate36.2%45.7%46.8%10.6% short
Shot accuracy14.5%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.051.060.07 short
Match win rate47.0%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGorigoflix YTFACEITLevel 7 · 1,528 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,528csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning46
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43543Last 10043%Win rateLWWTTWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 212 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 622 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 1262 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch2.6

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.6
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time605ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 14 Mar
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 23 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · vertigo, 14 Jun
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 18 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2181338%-0.00
infernoC135838%0.01
dust2B126650%0.03
anubisD124833%0.01
vertigoD103730%-0.01
nukeS86275%0.03
cacheS64267%0.02
ancientD61517%-0.00
overpassA53260%0.03
warden21150%0.00
boulder1010%-0.07
cache_b1010%-0.00
train110100%0.03
alpine110100%0.16
stronghold1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

93,572Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
4,935Matches
47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
36.2%Headshot %
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
11,045MVPs
2,307Hours (in match)
6,367Bombs planted
1,711Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,756
AWP12,066
P902,136
P2501,773
Negev1,533

Lifetime map wins

8,122inferno
6,849dust2
4,133vertigo
4,087nuke
2,119train
1,533cbble
886office
682italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

122Matches
56%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
67.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3155%0.9915.3
Anubis2040%0.9615.9
Vertigo2070%1.1116.7
Ancient1662%0.9212.9
Overpass1155%0.9615.6
Nuke1155%1.0113.6
Dust2560%0.7912.4
Inferno560%1.0214.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
88.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
601msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
35.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
10.43HE damage / grenade
4.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4996 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.902% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0524%19 Sept
dust213–8-0.0215%19 Sept
anubis13–80.0723%19 Sept
boulder12–12-0.0722%19 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0210%19 Sept
vertigo13–4-0.0323%18 Sept
nuke13–80.1211%18 Sept
cache13–110.0430%18 Sept
inferno10–130.0120%28 Aug
cache13–80.0526%28 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0223%28 Aug
cache13–9-0.0214%18 Aug
vertigo3–13-0.0314%18 Aug
mirage13–40.0221%18 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0412%15 Aug
overpass13–90.0323%15 Aug
cache13–16-0.0220%15 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0313%15 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0423%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0024%6 Aug
mirage9–00.0423%6 Aug
vertigo13–16-0.0125%6 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0012%29 Jul
ancient0–7-0.0421%29 Jul
inferno13–50.0123%29 Jul
anubis13–100.0321%29 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0120%27 Jul
cache13–6-0.0022%27 Jul
vertigo14–160.0320%27 Jul
inferno13–90.1825%27 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0441%23 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0514%23 Jun
dust24–130.0124%16 Jun
mirage4–130.0217%16 Jun
vertigo13–9-0.0415%16 Jun
vertigo4–130.0619%14 Jun
nuke3–80.0133%14 Jun
ancient3–130.0822%14 Jun
cache9–130.0915%14 Jun
overpass13–50.067%30 May
dust24–130.0318%30 May
mirage10–130.0316%29 May
ancient11–130.0115%29 May
overpass5–130.0614%2 May
dust213–80.0427%24 Apr
vertigo9–13-0.0215%18 Apr
anubis13–10.1227%18 Apr
dust213–60.059%18 Apr
nuke13–100.0812%18 Apr
mirage13–90.0520%18 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0119%16 Apr
vertigo10–13-0.0321%10 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0313%10 Apr
mirage16–120.0026%10 Apr
nuke16–130.0620%10 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0318%10 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0321%9 Apr
dust28–130.0029%9 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0324%9 Apr
dust213–80.0013%5 Apr
mirage10–130.0124%5 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0422%5 Apr
cache_b9–13-0.0029%5 Apr
anubis8–130.0328%5 Apr
vertigo1–13-0.0132%5 Apr
train13–100.0325%5 Apr
anubis12–120.038%1 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0515%1 Apr
inferno16–190.0218%30 Mar
mirage13–70.0714%30 Mar
dust22–130.0426%30 Mar
mirage8–130.0532%27 Mar
inferno8–130.0031%27 Mar
mirage8–130.0015%22 Mar
dust213–40.0727%22 Mar
inferno6–130.0630%22 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0216%22 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0713%21 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0230%21 Mar
mirage16–14-0.0313%21 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0812%21 Mar
dust213–80.1933%14 Mar
inferno6–130.0312%14 Mar
overpass7–130.0421%14 Mar
nuke8–130.0417%14 Mar
dust25–13-0.0214%13 Mar
warden7–13-0.0630%13 Mar
ancient2–130.0019%13 Mar
anubis13–100.0415%8 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0315%8 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0517%6 Mar
vertigo13–10.0218%6 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0816%6 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0320%6 Mar
warden13–70.0617%1 Mar
alpine13–60.1618%1 Mar
stronghold10–130.0216%1 Mar
anubis10–130.0212%26 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0618%26 Feb
mirage11–130.0120%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →