emirbre#freepalestine

emirbre#freepalestine — CS2 Stats

SE76561198028878085[U:1:68612357]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

698Tracked matches28%Win rate2022Tracked since
762Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 20 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,560 +988 18 Feb21 May · 21 days played
8,57210,106peak 10,10618 Feb21 May
10,109Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-01-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.6%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy7.9%12.0%12.5%4.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.021.030.14 short
Match win rate39.6%44.7%45.2%5.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGemirbre#freepalestineFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning53
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38593Last 10038%Win rateWWLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.3pp headshot accuracy · −132ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 515 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 680ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.8
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 706ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.3
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time701ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 757ms → last ⅓ avg 701ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 11 Feb
38%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · mirage, 26 Feb
469msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 18 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 18 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 16mirageWeakest map · 29% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2882029%-0.02
dust2B21101148%-0.01
infernoA169756%-0.01
ancientC104640%-0.04
nukeD93633%-0.01
anubisB84450%-0.03
vertigo2020%0.00
overpass2020%-0.02
cache1010%-0.04
poseidon1010%-0.08
cache_b1010%-0.07
train1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,693Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
1,287Matches
39.6%Match win rate
48.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
7.9%Shot accuracy
2,333MVPs
471Hours (in match)
1,368Bombs planted
261Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,891inferno
1,364dust2
1,117vertigo
792nuke
277train
66lake
57cbble
28office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

51Matches
43%Win rate
0.63Avg K/D
56.6ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1354%0.7311.6
Ancient956%0.599.9
Nuke617%0.499.2
Anubis650%0.507.5
Vertigo540%0.7111.6
Dust2540%0.7612.6
Inferno333%0.667.7
Overpass250%0.386.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
706msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
12.40HE damage / grenade
7.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 705.5885ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5059% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–10-0.0115%18 Sept
inferno13–90.0110%17 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0018%6 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0217%6 Sept
mirage13–80.0615%6 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0732%27 Aug
cache4–13-0.0414%13 Jul
ancient5–13-0.1016%13 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0719%13 Jul
mirage6–13-0.077%13 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0514%8 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0521%8 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0129%3 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0418%3 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0429%21 May
mirage11–130.0318%29 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0115%25 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0421%25 Apr
vertigo9–130.0223%18 Apr
anubis13–10.0417%18 Apr
vertigo4–13-0.0123%17 Apr
dust215–15-0.0313%16 Apr
ancient13–6-0.048%16 Apr
dust213–11-0.0116%16 Apr
mirage13–70.0225%16 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0213%12 Apr
dust24–13-0.0422%12 Apr
dust210–130.0514%12 Apr
dust212–16-0.0618%10 Apr
mirage3–130.0130%10 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0321%9 Apr
dust28–130.0115%9 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0627%9 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0619%9 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0131%8 Apr
dust216–140.0519%8 Apr
poseidon3–9-0.0832%8 Apr
inferno3–9-0.159%8 Apr
dust28–130.0027%5 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0227%5 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0526%5 Apr
cache_b9–13-0.0721%5 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0824%30 Mar
inferno16–19-0.0124%30 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0022%30 Mar
dust22–13-0.0325%30 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0514%27 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0111%27 Mar
mirage8–130.0228%22 Mar
dust213–40.0418%22 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0326%19 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0529%19 Mar
nuke12–160.0218%15 Mar
inferno13–60.0119%15 Mar
mirage13–110.0326%15 Mar
dust28–13-0.0222%15 Mar
dust28–13-0.0523%13 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0222%13 Mar
dust213–110.0121%12 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0120%12 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0125%11 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0315%11 Mar
nuke13–80.0115%11 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0823%8 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0626%8 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0321%8 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0230%28 Feb
inferno13–90.0114%28 Feb
dust213–50.0222%28 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0117%26 Feb
train9–130.0222%26 Feb
dust213–6-0.0222%26 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0738%26 Feb
inferno13–80.0417%25 Feb
dust213–11-0.0535%25 Feb
mirage16–12-0.0115%25 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0115%25 Feb
nuke10–10.0319%18 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0621%18 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0521%18 Feb
dust213–1-0.067%12 Feb
inferno16–14-0.0121%12 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0523%12 Feb
anubis13–3-0.0021%12 Feb
mirage6–130.0215%11 Feb
inferno13–20.1118%11 Feb
dust26–13-0.0620%11 Feb
dust213–9-0.0116%11 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0220%11 Feb
ancient16–13-0.0416%11 Feb
overpass5–13-0.049%10 Feb
dust213–10.0938%10 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0326%10 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0428%9 Feb
nuke15–15-0.0418%9 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0130%30 Jan
dust24–13-0.1038%30 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0323%26 Jan
ancient13–50.0212%20 Jan
nuke13–70.0111%20 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →