/NIKA/

/NIKA/ — CS2 Stats

76561198075530127[U:1:115264399]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,358Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,750Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating15,515Purple band · top ~26.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,515 -792 11 Sept – 31 Oct · 29 days played
15,00017,291peak 17,29111 Sept31 Oct
17,637Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-09-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,776 below peak (17,291)
  • +241 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,485 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate39.6%45.7%46.8%7.2% short
Shot accuracy14.1%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.911.051.060.16 short
Match win rate42.3%45.7%46.3%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG/NIKA/FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,515 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning49
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–52–5Last 10043%Win rateLLWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 43% on T to 27% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time547ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 532ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy14.5%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 20 Sept →
28%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 23 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · cache, 27 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
14–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 57% over 23mirageWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2313–1057%0.01
cacheC218–1338%0.00
infernoB189–950%0.01
nukeD124–833%-0.00
anubisC94–544%-0.01
mirageD82–625%-0.01
ancientC83–538%0.02
train—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

169,794Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
9,307Matches
42.3%Match win rate
39.6%Headshot %
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
19,854MVPs
4,473Hours (in match)
14,116Bombs planted
2,604Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4747,738
AWP17,392
P9014,579
MP76,341
MAC-104,112
XM10144,092

Lifetime map wins

38,002dust2
19,946inferno
6,890nuke
2,216vertigo
1,696office
1,299train
213cbble
69aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

296Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
90.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5252%1.2716.3
Inferno3962%1.2116.9
Anubis3759%0.9814.5
Mirage2446%0.9615.5
Vertigo1457%0.9012.9
Nuke1354%1.3817.8
Overpass1362%1.0314.4
Dust2825%1.0516.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
41.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
546msReaction time
43.0%T opening success
26.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
7.49HE damage / grenade
12.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 26.9411% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–130.006%31 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0414%31 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0411%26 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0112%26 Oct →
cache13–70.0128%24 Oct →
cache13–50.0215%24 Oct →
inferno13–110.049%24 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0115%24 Oct →
inferno11–130.0118%23 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0314%23 Oct →
nuke2–130.0213%21 Oct →
dust29–130.0221%20 Oct →
dust27–130.0422%20 Oct →
anubis6–130.0811%20 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0511%20 Oct →
inferno13–90.0112%20 Oct →
dust213–110.0323%19 Oct →
dust216–140.0410%19 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0317%19 Oct →
nuke13–70.0416%19 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.034%19 Oct →
cache11–130.0918%18 Oct →
cache13–1-0.0011%18 Oct →
mirage13–30.0615%18 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0118%18 Oct →
dust213–100.0522%4 Oct →
ancient13–110.0915%4 Oct →
cache9–130.0614%4 Oct →
inferno13–80.0419%3 Oct →
dust213–110.0215%3 Oct →
inferno14–160.0417%2 Oct →
train4–13-0.040%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0114%2 Oct →
inferno11–130.0219%2 Oct →
dust25–13-0.035%1 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0212%1 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0413%30 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.036%30 Sept →
mirage9–130.0120%28 Sept →
cache11–130.026%28 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0916%27 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0618%27 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0111%26 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0413%26 Sept →
anubis7–130.0212%26 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0310%26 Sept →
nuke15–150.0210%26 Sept →
inferno13–60.0425%26 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.069%26 Sept →
nuke13–90.036%25 Sept →
dust26–13-0.1117%25 Sept →
dust213–110.0223%25 Sept →
cache15–150.0417%24 Sept →
nuke13–110.0414%24 Sept →
anubis13–110.0013%24 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0012%24 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0423%24 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0628%23 Sept →
dust213–5-0.019%23 Sept →
dust28–130.0715%23 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0012%23 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0220%23 Sept →
cache13–80.0512%23 Sept →
inferno13–50.0014%23 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.036%23 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0126%22 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0322%21 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0115%21 Sept →
cache13–80.0124%20 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0213%20 Sept →
cache11–130.0519%20 Sept →
dust213–10.1622%20 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0423%20 Sept →
cache5–130.0110%19 Sept →
nuke15–150.0322%19 Sept →
inferno7–130.0110%19 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0215%18 Sept →
ancient16–140.0418%18 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0612%18 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0313%18 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0713%18 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0710%17 Sept →
inferno13–90.0823%17 Sept →
ancient8–130.0418%17 Sept →
ancient1–130.0422%16 Sept →
inferno15–150.0611%16 Sept →
dust213–100.0915%14 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.014%14 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0216%14 Sept →
dust213–60.0418%14 Sept →
dust213–40.0820%14 Sept →
cache11–13-0.039%13 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0523%13 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0111%12 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0119%12 Sept →
dust213–11-0.019%12 Sept →
ancient13–60.037%12 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0614%11 Sept →
mirage13–60.0312%11 Sept →
anubis11–5-0.0114%11 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.