p1mplA

p1mplA — CS2 Stats

ES76561198074349842[U:1:114084114]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,054Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
4,718Hours in CS57Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,608Purple band · top ~14% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,184 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,608 +1,345 30 Aug – 2 Nov · 23 days played
14,60918,608peak 18,60830 Aug2 Nov
18,608Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,184Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,184
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 17 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,608
  • +3,610 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,392 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.0%48.2%50.9%5.9% short
Shot accuracy3.5%13.2%13.7%10.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.071.090.20 short
Match win rate41.6%46.9%48.4%6.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGp1mplAFACEITLevel 9 · 1,184 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,608 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,184csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning54
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–41–2Last 10057%Win rateWWWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.7pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time515ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · cache, 9 Oct →
59%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · cache, 24 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · anubis, 29 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 50% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2614–1254%-0.01
anubisA2011–955%0.01
infernoA1610–663%0.01
nukeA127–558%0.01
ancientB105–550%0.02
cacheS86–275%0.03
mirageB63–350%0.00
vertigo—11–0100%0.07
poseidon—10–10%-0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

112,305Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
6,262Matches
41.6%Match win rate
45.0%Headshot %
3.5%Shot accuracy
12,264MVPs
2,665Hours (in match)
6,203Bombs planted
1,313Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,735
AWP15,887
MAC-105,210
MP93,893
FAMAS2,345

Lifetime map wins

11,830inferno
10,954dust2
3,637nuke
2,631vertigo
605cbble
555train
235lake
40ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,268Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
72.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust236051%0.9113.6
Anubis26654%1.0115.1
Inferno22755%0.9914.7
Ancient19944%0.9714.7
Mirage9041%0.8113.4
Nuke8845%0.9614.8
Cache2050%0.9415.0
Vertigo757%1.1416.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
67.4%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
520msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
8.78HE damage / grenade
7.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4191 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.861% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–4-0.0619%2 Nov →
inferno13–8-0.0215%2 Nov →
anubis13–80.0710%2 Nov →
inferno13–70.1027%29 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0527%29 Oct →
anubis13–80.0418%26 Oct →
mirage13–110.0226%26 Oct →
dust219–22-0.0117%26 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0626%26 Oct →
dust213–40.0338%26 Oct →
ancient13–80.0121%26 Oct →
mirage13–110.0126%25 Oct →
nuke10–130.0320%25 Oct →
inferno13–100.0127%25 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0444%25 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0115%25 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0313%25 Oct →
cache13–40.0159%24 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0523%23 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0124%23 Oct →
inferno15–150.0225%22 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0114%21 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0816%20 Oct →
ancient7–130.0429%20 Oct →
nuke7–130.0018%20 Oct →
inferno13–40.0319%20 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0318%20 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.1033%20 Oct →
inferno9–130.0419%19 Oct →
dust213–20.0627%18 Oct →
anubis13–70.0626%18 Oct →
ancient13–40.1019%18 Oct →
anubis11–1-0.0325%18 Oct →
dust216–130.0125%17 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0130%17 Oct →
anubis13–40.0321%16 Oct →
mirage13–100.0225%16 Oct →
ancient13–30.0215%15 Oct →
dust213–110.028%15 Oct →
mirage11–130.0028%12 Oct →
nuke13–40.0723%12 Oct →
dust29–13-0.049%12 Oct →
anubis15–150.0226%12 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0322%12 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0125%11 Oct →
dust211–3-0.0038%11 Oct →
dust213–20.0220%11 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0323%11 Oct →
ancient13–40.0828%11 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0312%11 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0024%11 Oct →
cache13–80.0248%11 Oct →
inferno5–130.0231%11 Oct →
anubis16–140.0927%11 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0520%11 Oct →
nuke16–120.0733%10 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0319%10 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.1023%10 Oct →
dust210–13-0.047%10 Oct →
cache3–13-0.037%10 Oct →
vertigo9–60.0736%10 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0115%10 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0018%10 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0210%9 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0124%9 Oct →
inferno13–100.0221%9 Oct →
cache13–80.1228%9 Oct →
inferno13–110.0220%9 Oct →
cache13–80.0317%9 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0113%9 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0124%9 Oct →
nuke13–110.0226%9 Oct →
nuke13–70.0724%9 Oct →
poseidon3–9-0.1720%8 Oct →
anubis13–100.0316%7 Oct →
anubis3–130.0027%7 Oct →
inferno13–20.0122%7 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0514%6 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0327%6 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0625%6 Oct →
inferno13–80.0419%6 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0110%6 Oct →
anubis13–110.0619%6 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0150%5 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0418%5 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0316%5 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0220%5 Oct →
anubis13–90.0419%4 Oct →
ancient13–90.0125%3 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0528%3 Oct →
ancient10–130.0220%3 Oct →
nuke13–50.0324%3 Oct →
cache16–130.1018%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0613%2 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0016%2 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0618%2 Oct →
cache9–130.0019%1 Oct →
dust213–50.0525%1 Oct →
inferno13–70.0214%1 Oct →
anubis16–130.028%1 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.